Literature DB >> 27976951

Recruiting Adolescent Research Participants: In-Person Compared to Social Media Approaches.

Megan A Moreno1,2, Alan Waite1, Megan Pumper1, Trina Colburn1, Matt Holm3, Jason Mendoza1,2.   

Abstract

Recruiting adolescent participants for research is challenging. The purpose of this study was to compare traditional in-person recruitment methods to social media recruitment. We recruited adolescents aged 14-18 years for a pilot physical activity intervention study, including a wearable physical activity tracking device and a Facebook group. Participants were recruited (a) in person from a local high school and an adolescent medicine clinic and (b) through social media, including Facebook targeted ads, sponsored tweets on Twitter, and a blog post. Data collected included total exposure (i.e., reach), engagement (i.e., interaction), and effectiveness. Effectiveness included screening and enrollment for each recruitment method, as well as time and resources spent on each recruitment method. In-person recruitment reached a total of 297 potential participants of which 37 enrolled in the study. Social media recruitment reached a total of 34,272 potential participants of which 8 enrolled in the study. Social media recruitment methods utilized an average of 1.6 hours of staff time and cost an average of $40.99 per participant enrolled, while in-person recruitment methods utilized an average of 0.75 hours of staff time and cost an average of $19.09 per participant enrolled. Social media recruitment reached more potential participants, but the cost per participant enrolled was higher compared to traditional methods. Studies need to consider benefits and downsides of traditional and social media recruitment methods based on study goals and population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; methodology; physical activity; recruitment; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27976951     DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  15 in total

1.  Effectiveness of social media (Facebook), targeted mailing, and in-person solicitation for the recruitment of young adult in a diabetes self-management clinical trial.

Authors:  Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Kristine Carandang; Cheryl Lp Vigen; Alyssa Concha-Chavez; Paola A Sequeira; Jeanine Blanchard; Jesus Diaz; Jennifer Raymond; Elizabeth A Pyatak
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Effect of soluble corn fiber supplementation for 1 year on bone metabolism in children, the MetA-bone trial: Rationale and design.

Authors:  C Palacios; M A Trak-Fellermeier; C M Pérez; F Huffman; Y Hernandez Suarez; Z Bursac; T B Gambon; C H Nakatsu; C M Weaver
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Use of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter for recruiting healthy participants in nutrition-, physical activity-, or obesity-related studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Malik Ellington; Jeneene Connelly; Priscilla Clayton; C Yaisli Lorenzo; Christina Collazo-Velazquez; María Angélica Trak-Fellermeier; Cristina Palacios
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 8.472

4.  Addressing the Challenges of Recruitment and Retention in Sleep and Circadian Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stephanie H Yu; Nicole B Gumport; Isaac A Mirzadegan; Yuh-Jang Mei; Kerrie Hein; Allison G Harvey
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Recruitment of adults with moderate eczema for a randomised trial: Comparison of traditional versus modern methods.

Authors:  Fabrizio Spada; Ian P Harrison; Tanya M Barnes; Kerryn A Greive; Daisy Daniels; Joshua P Townley; Niyaz Mostafa; Andrew T Fong; Philip L Tong; Stephen Shumack
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 6.  Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.

Authors:  Geoff K Frampton; Jonathan Shepherd; Karen Pickett; Gareth Griffiths; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  The Use of Facebook in Recruiting Participants for Health Research Purposes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher Whitaker; Sharon Stevelink; Nicola Fear
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Child and adolescent musculoskeletal pain (CAM-Pain) feasibility study: testing a method of identifying, recruiting and collecting data from children and adolescents who consult about a musculoskeletal condition in UK general practice.

Authors:  Zoe A Michaleff; Paul Campbell; Alastair D Hay; Louise Warburton; Kate M Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mette Brøgger-Mikkelsen; Zarqa Ali; John R Zibert; Anders Daniel Andersen; Simon Francis Thomsen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  The Role of Social Media in Enhancing Clinical Trial Recruitment: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ida Darmawan; Caitlin Bakker; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Milton Eder
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.