Literature DB >> 27976594

A qualitative study exploring factors that influence enrollment in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Codie R Rouleau1, Kathryn M King-Shier2, Lianne M Tomfohr-Madsen1, Sandeep G Aggarwal3,4, Ross Arena5, Tavis S Campbell1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study explored patients' decision-making about whether or not to enroll in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), an underutilized program that is associated with significantly improved health outcomes.
METHOD: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with acute coronary syndrome patients (n = 14) after referral to a local CR center, but prior to program enrollment. Thematic analysis was used to derive themes from interview transcripts.
RESULTS: Three themes emerged including anticipated benefit, perceived ability, and contextual influences. Participants believed key benefits of CR would be access to specialist health care providers, improved longevity, reduced cardiovascular risk, as well as improved motivation, accountability, learning opportunities, and general fitness. Participants were concerned about their ability to engage in and travel to exercise sessions, pay the program fee, and manage scheduling conflicts. Contextual influences on decision-making included health care provider recommendation, first impressions of the CR center, knowledge gaps about what CR entails, input from family and peers, and psychological distress.
CONCLUSION: The period following CR referral but prior to enrollment represents an optimal opportunity to promote in-the-moment decisions in favor of CR. Patients report both positive and negative aspects of CR, suggesting individualized efforts to resolve ambivalence may increase program participation. Implications for Rehabilitation Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective secondary prevention strategy to improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, but only a subset of eligible patients enroll. After referral but prior to enrollment, patients anticipate both positive and negative aspects of CR participation. Individualized efforts to resolve ambivalence, address knowledge gaps, and problem-solve barriers may increase uptake into CR programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac rehabilitation; acute coronary syndrome; enrollment; qualitative study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27976594     DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  4 in total

1.  Feasibility of integrating survivors of stroke into cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Elizabeth W Regan; Reed Handlery; Jill C Stewart; Joseph L Pearson; Sara Wilcox; Stacy Fritz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Heart Rehabilitation for All (HeRTA): Protocol for a feasibility study and pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Hanne Birke; Ida Foxvig; Karin Burns; Ulla Toft; Anders Blædel Gottlieb Hansen; Pernille Ibsen Hauge; Sussie Foghmar; Rikke Bülow Mindegaard; Louise Meinertz Jakobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Feasibility of an Emotion Regulation Intervention for Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Kelly L Wierenga; David M Fresco; Megan Alder; Shirley M Moore
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.774

4.  Priorities for Services in Young Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Their Family Members: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Raymond Y Cho; Jian Weng; Kelsey Lynch; Phoebe Ng; Chad Brown; Alison M Hoens; Kevin Barry; Liam R Brunham; Simon Pimstone
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2019-03-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.