Literature DB >> 27976450

Studying the Safety and Performance of Rapid Sequence Intubation: Data Collection Method Matters.

Andrea S Rinderknecht1,2, Jenna R Dyas1, Benjamin T Kerrey1,2, Gary L Geis1,2, Mona H Ho1, Matthew R Mittiga1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe and compare chart and video review as data collection sources for the study of emergency department (ED) rapid sequence intubation (RSI).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compares the availability and content of key RSI outcome and process data from two sources: chart and video data from 12 months of pediatric ED RSI. Key outcomes included adverse effects (oxyhemoglobin desaturation, physiologic changes, inadequate paralysis, vomiting), process components (number of laryngoscopy attempts, end-tidal CO2 detection), and timing data (duration of preoxygenation and laryngoscopy attempts).
RESULTS: We reviewed 566 documents from 114 cases with video data. Video review detected higher rates of adverse effects (67%) than did chart review (46%, p < 0.0001), identifying almost twice the rate of desaturation noted in the chart (34% vs. 18%, p = 0.0002). The performance and timing of key RSI processes were significantly more reliably available via video review (timing and duration of preoxygenation, as well as timing, duration, and number of laryngoscopy attempts, all p < 0.05). Video review identified 221 laryngoscopy attempts, whereas chart review only identified 187.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with video review for retrospective study of RSI in a pediatric ED, chart review significantly underestimated adverse effects, inconsistently contained data on important RSI process elements, rarely provided time data, and often conflicted with observations made on video review. Interpretation of and design of future studies of RSI should take into consideration the quality of the data source.
© 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27976450     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  6 in total

1.  Optimizing Rapid Sequence Intubation for Medical and Trauma Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Berkeley L Bennett; Daniel Scherzer; Delia Gold; Don Buckingham; Andrew McClain; Elaise Hill; Adjoa Andoh; Joseph Christman; Andrew Shonk; Sandra P Spencer
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  If at First You Don't Succeed: Patient Characteristics Associated with First-Attempt Failure of Video Laryngoscopy in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Mark E Mikkelsen
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-03

3.  Improvement in the Safety of Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department with the Use of an Airway Continuous Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  John C Sakles; Cassidy C Augustinovich; Asad E Patanwala; Garrett S Pacheco; Jarrod M Mosier
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-06-03

4.  Breathing Easier: Decreasing Tracheal Intubation-associated Adverse Events in the Pediatric ED and Urgent Care.

Authors:  Tara L Neubrand; Michelle Alletag; Jason Woods; Marcela Mendenhall; Jan Leonard; Sarah K Schmidt
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-11-19

5.  Sustained Improvement in the Performance of Rapid Sequence Intubation Five Years after a Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Benjamin T Kerrey; Matthew R Mittiga; Stephanie Boyd; Mary Frey; Gary L Geis; Andrea S Rinderknecht; Karen Ahaus; Kartik R Varadarajan; Joseph W Luria; Srikant B Iyer
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Practice, Outcomes, and Complications of Emergent Endotracheal Intubation by Critical Care Practitioners During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Peter C Nauka; Jen-Ting Chen; Ariel L Shiloh; Lewis A Eisen; Daniel G Fein
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.410

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.