| Literature DB >> 27974549 |
Daniel W H Ho1,2, Lo K Chan1,2, Yung T Chiu1,2, Iris M J Xu1,2, Ronnie T P Poon2,3, Tan T Cheung3, Chung N Tang4, Victor W L Tang5, Irene L O Lo6, Polly W Y Lam7, Derek T W Yau7, Miao X Li8, Chun M Wong1,2, Irene O L Ng1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the mutational landscape of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling cascade in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with chronic HBV background, aiming to evaluate and delineate mutation-dependent mechanism of mTOR hyperactivation in hepatocarcinogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: GENE MUTATION; HEPATITIS B; HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA; MUTATION SCREENING
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27974549 PMCID: PMC5530480 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312734
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gut ISSN: 0017-5749 Impact factor: 23.059
Figure 1Representations of the targeted DNA sequencing (targeted-seq) for mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) discovery cohort. (A) A total of 95 HBV-associated human HCC tumour samples were subjected to targeted-seq for mTOR pathway-related genes. Sixty-nine HCC samples were found to carry at least one mTOR-related mutation. Among the 81 mTOR-related genes being screened, 25 were found to be recurrently mutated in more than one sample, while 22 of them were singleton. The mutant genes were ranked and listed accordingly to their frequency. (B) Schematic diagram visualising the mutants listed in (A) to illustrate their implications in mTOR-related signalling. TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex.
Figure 2Frequent tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)1 and TSC2 mutations define a novel subgroup of human hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). (A) Diagram listing the key genes found to be mutated in our HCC discovery cohort (n=95). TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and ARID1A are key genes which have been known to be mutated in human HCC. We found that the TSC1 and TSC2, which encodes protein complex as negative regulator of mammalian target of rapamycin signalling, were frequently mutated. (B) Venn diagrams showing the rates of coincidence of TSC2 or TSC1 mutations with TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and ARID1A as highlighted by the black lines.
Clinicopathological correlation of patient with HCC samples carrying TSC mutation and other background mutation*
| Parameters | With | With known HCC driver mutation† | Others | p Value‡ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 15 (83.3%) | 40 (75.5%) | 26 (65%) | 0.342 |
| Female | 3 (16.7%) | 13 (24.5%) | 14 (35%) | |
| Mean age (range)§ | 50.7 (24–68) | 52.4 (29–72) | 51.0 (24–74) | 0.812 |
| Tumour size | ||||
| >5 cm | 15 (83.3%) | 31 (58.5%) | 19 (47.5%) |
|
| ≤5 cm | 3 (16.7%) | 22 (41.5%) | 21 (52.5%) | |
| Background liver disease | ||||
| Normal | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.5%) | 0.350 |
| Chronic hepatitis | 8 (44.4%) | 22 (41.5%) | 17 (42.5%) | |
| Cirrhosis | 10 (55.6%) | 31 (58.5%) | 20 (50%) | |
| Liver invasion | ||||
| Yes | 4 (23.5%) | 23 (45.1%) | 10 (26.3%) | 0.117 |
| No | 13 (76.5%) | 28 (54.9%) | 28 (73.7%) | |
| Tumour microsatellite formation | ||||
| Yes | 9 (52.9%) | 29 (55.8%) | 20 (51.3%) | 0.912 |
| No | 8 (47.1%) | 23 (44.2%) | 19 (48.7%) | |
| Tumour encapsulation | ||||
| Yes | 5 (27.8%) | 18 (34.6%) | 15 (39.5%) | 0.712 |
| No | 13 (72.2%) | 34 (65.4%) | 23 (60.5%) | |
| Venous invasion | ||||
| Yes | 14 (77.8%) | 31 (58.5%) | 17 (42.5%) |
|
| No | 4 (22.2%) | 22 (41.5%) | 23 (57.5%) | |
| Cellular differentiation | ||||
| Edmondson grade I–II | 5 (27.8%) | 21 (39.6%) | 15 (37.5%) | 0.724 |
| Edmondson grade III–IV | 13 (72.2%) | 32 (60.4%) | 25 (62.5%) | |
| TNM staging | ||||
| I–II | 4 (22.2%) | 19 (35.8%) | 19 (47.5%) | 0.175 |
| III–IV | 14 (77.8%) | 34 (64.2%) | 21 (52.5%) | |
Bold indicates statistically significant p values.
*Patient samples from discovery and validation cohorts (n=111) were stratified into three groups: with TSC mutation (n=18), with known HCC driver mutations (n=53) and other mutations (n=40) accordingly.
†Cases that carry no TSC mutations but having mutations in any of TP53, CTNNB1, AXIN1 and ARID1A.
‡Fisher's exact test.
§Analysis of variance.
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TNM, tumour, node, metastases; TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex.
Figure 3Representations of the confirmation of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)1/2 mutations and their possible effects in negatively regulating their tumour suppressing activity. (A) Sanger sequencing confirmation of the TSC2 mutations identified from the targeted DNA sequencing (targeted-seq) in both tumours and corresponding non-tumorous livers is shown. The identified mutations were classified as somatic and non-somatic. (B) Sanger sequencing confirmation of the TSC1 mutations identified from the targeted-seq in both tumours and corresponding non-tumorous livers is shown. The identified mutations were classified as somatic and non-somatic. (C) Flow chart summarising the number of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases carrying the TSC1 and TSC2 mutations in the discovery cohort, validation cohort or the total combined HCC cases. (D) Diagram summarising and categorising the types of TSC2 (n=15) and TSC1 (n=6) mutations found in the current study. (E) Schematic diagram showing the alterations of the amino acid changes in TSC1 and TSC2 by the identified genetic changes.
Figure 4Downregulation of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)1/2 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carrying TSC mutations is shown. (A) Twelve HCC samples carrying somatic TSC1/2 mutations and their corresponding NTL were subjected to IHC staining for TSC1/2. The TSC1/2 staining intensity in the tumour and non-tumour tissues were collectively presented as mean IHC score. Their statistical difference was compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test (one-sided). (B) Representative IHC images showing the reduced TSC2 expression in HCC tumours carrying TSC2 non-sense mutation (TSC2 Q63X, Case PY003T) and splicing mutation (Case 330T) and their corresponding phospho-S6 staining as downstream markers for mammalian target of rapamycin pathway activation. (C) Representative IHC images showing the TSC2 expression and the downstream phospho-S6 staining in two HCC cases (TSC2 WT, Case 361T and Case 368T) with no TSC2 mutation. IHC, immunohistochemistry; NTL, non-tumorous liver.
Figure 5The mutational status and expression of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)1/2 in a panel of human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines and their sensitivity to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor treatment are shown. (A) RNA sequencing revealed that PLC HCC cells carried a TSC2 mutation. (B) The TSC2 mutation identified by RNA sequencing in PLC was confirmed by Sanger sequencing at genomic level. (C) Protein expression levels of TSC1 and TSC2 in a panel of HCC cell lines were determined by western blotting with the use TSC1-specific and TSC2-specific antibodies. PLC, H2P and H2M cells showed relatively low TSC1 as well as TSC2 protein expression. H2M was derived from H2P. (D) Sanger sequencing revealed a stop-gain mutation in TSC1 and a missense mutation in TSC2 in H2P cells. The stop-gain mutation may account for the loss of TSC1 protein expression in H2P cells. (E) Schematic diagram showing the TSC1 and TSC2 mutants identified in PLC and H2P cells. (F) Eight HCC cell lines with defined mutational status of TSC1/2 were subjected to rapamycin treatment at the indicated concentrations for 4 days, followed by fixation and crystal violet staining for visualisation.
Figure 6Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient-derived tumour xenograft (PDTX) models with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)2 mutations were more sensitive to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor treatment. (A) The graph showing body weight of TSC2-mutant (PDTX#5 and PDTX#9) and TSC2 wild-type (PDTX#3) PDTX tumour-bearing mice throughout the treatment. Body weights were measured every 3 days to assess the general toxicity of the injected vehicle and rapamycin. The relative body weights (rapamycin/vehicle) of PDTX#5, PDTX#9 and PDTX#3 mice are shown. (B) The tumour volumes of the PDTX tumour-bearing mice subjected to vehicle or rapamycin treatment at 1.0 mg/kg/day, unless stated otherwise, are shown. The volumes of the subcutaneous tumours were measured every 3 days throughout the treatment. The numbers in grey represent the mean volume ratio between the vehicle and rapamycin-treated group at the indicated time points. t-test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (C) The relative tumour volumes (rapamycin/vehicle) of PDTX#5 and PDTX#9 tumours are shown alongside with those of PDTX#3. t-test; ***p<0.001. (D) An overview of the subcutaneous tumours formed and the corresponding dissected tumours at the end point of the experiment is shown. (E) The tumour masses of the dissected tumours at the end point of the treatment are shown. The numbers in grey represent the mean tumour mass ratio between the vehicle and rapamycin-treated groups. t-test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. (F) The relative tumour masses (rapamycin/vehicle) of PDTX#5, PDTX#9 and PDTX#3 are shown. t-test; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.