Literature DB >> 27974534

How the bending kinematics of swimming lampreys build negative pressure fields for suction thrust.

Brad J Gemmell1,2, Stephanie M Fogerson2, John H Costello2,3, Jennifer R Morgan2, John O Dabiri4, Sean P Colin5,6.   

Abstract

Swimming animals commonly bend their bodies to generate thrust. For undulating animals such as eels and lampreys, their bodies bend in the form of waves that travel from head to tail. These kinematics accelerate the flow of adjacent fluids, which alters the pressure field in a manner that generates thrust. We used a comparative approach to evaluate the cause-and-effect relationships in this process by quantifying the hydrodynamic effects of body kinematics at the body-fluid interface of the lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, during steady-state swimming. We compared the kinematics and hydrodynamics of healthy control lampreys to lampreys whose spinal cord had been transected mid-body, resulting in passive kinematics along the posterior half of their body. Using high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) and a method for quantifying pressure fields, we detail how the active bending kinematics of the control lampreys were crucial for setting up strong negative pressure fields (relative to ambient fields) that generated high-thrust regions at the bends as they traveled all along the body. The passive kinematics of the transected lamprey were only able to generate significant thrust at the tail, relying on positive pressure fields. These different pressure and thrust scenarios are due to differences in how active versus passive body waves generated and controlled vorticity. This demonstrates why it is more effective for undulating lampreys to pull, rather than push, themselves through the fluid.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Fish; Flexible bending; Hydrodynamics; Propulsion; Vortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27974534     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.144642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  The most efficient metazoan swimmer creates a 'virtual wall' to enhance performance.

Authors:  Brad J Gemmell; Kevin T Du Clos; Sean P Colin; Kelly R Sutherland; John H Costello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Accelerating fishes increase propulsive efficiency by modulating vortex ring geometry.

Authors:  Otar Akanyeti; Joy Putney; Yuzo R Yanagitsuru; George V Lauder; William J Stewart; James C Liao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Airfoil-like mechanics generate thrust on the anterior body of swimming fishes.

Authors:  Kelsey N Lucas; George V Lauder; Eric D Tytell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Swimming kinematics and performance of spinal transected lampreys with different levels of axon regeneration.

Authors:  Jacob Fies; Brad J Gemmell; Stephanie M Fogerson; Jennifer R Morgan; Eric D Tytell; Sean P Colin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  PTPσ Knockdown in Lampreys Impairs Reticulospinal Axon Regeneration and Neuronal Survival After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  William Rodemer; Guixin Zhang; Isabelle Sinitsa; Jianli Hu; Li-Qing Jin; Shuxin Li; Michael E Selzer
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  The role of suction thrust in the metachronal paddles of swimming invertebrates.

Authors:  Sean P Colin; John H Costello; Kelly R Sutherland; Brad J Gemmell; John O Dabiri; Kevin T Du Clos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.