Literature DB >> 27974383

High-Sensitivity Troponin T vs I in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prediction of Significant Coronary Lesions and Long-term Prognosis.

Brede Kvisvik1,2, Lars Mørkrid3, Helge Røsjø1,2, Milada Cvancarova1, Alexander D Rowe3,4, Christian Eek5, Bjørn Bendz5, Thor Edvardsen2,5, Jørgen Gravning6,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T and I assays are established as crucial tools for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), as they have been found superior to old troponin assays. However, eventual differences between the assays in prediction of significant coronary lesions and long-term prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have not been fully unraveled.
METHODS: Serum concentrations of hs-cTnT (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott), and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; Roche) in 390 non-ST-elevation (NSTE) ACS patients were evaluated in relation to significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography (defined as a stenosis >50% of the luminal diameter, with need for revascularization) and prognostic accuracy for cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, as well as the composite end point of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations for AMI or heart failure.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up was 2921 (168) days. Absolute hs-cTnI concentrations were significantly higher than the hs-cTnT concentrations. The relationship between analyzed biomarkers and significant coronary lesions on coronary angiography, as quantified by the area under the ROC curve (AUC), revealed no difference between hs-cTnT [AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86] and hs-cTnI (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86; P = NS). NT-proBNP was superior to both hs-cTn assays regarding prognostic accuracy for both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and for the composite end point during follow-up, also in multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI assays displayed a similar ability to predict significant coronary lesions in NSTE-ACS patients. NT-proBNP was superior to both hs-cTn assays as a marker of long-term prognosis in this patient group.
© 2016 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27974383     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.261107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  11 in total

1.  High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Incident Coronary Events, Stroke, Heart Failure Hospitalization, and Mortality in the ARIC Study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Jia; Wensheng Sun; Ron C Hoogeveen; Vijay Nambi; Kunihiro Matsushita; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss; David J Couper; Scott D Solomon; Eric Boerwinkle; Amil Shah; Elizabeth Selvin; James A de Lemos; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  High sensitivity troponin measurement in critical care: Flattering to deceive or 'never means nothing'?

Authors:  Jonathan Hinton; Mark Mariathas; Michael Pw Grocott; Nick Curzen
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-09-05

3.  Biomarker-based risk model to predict cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes - Results from BIPass registry.

Authors:  Jiali Wang; Wei Gao; Guanghui Chen; Ming Chen; Zhi Wan; Wen Zheng; Jingjing Ma; Jiaojiao Pang; Guangmei Wang; Shuo Wu; Shuo Wang; Feng Xu; Derek P Chew; Yuguo Chen
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Biomarkers: Lessons of the Past and Prospects for the Future.

Authors:  Farah Omran; Ioannis Kyrou; Faizel Osman; Ven Gee Lim; Harpal Singh Randeva; Kamaljit Chatha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Circulating levels of cardiac troponin T are associated with coronary noncalcified plaque burden in HIV-infected adults: a pilot study.

Authors:  Parker Foster; Lori Sokoll; Ji Li; Gary Gerstenblith; Elliot K Fishman; Thomas Kickler; Shaoguang Chen; Hong Tai; Hong Lai; Shenghan Lai
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Cysteine-Rich Angiogenic Inducer 61 Improves Prognostic Accuracy of GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) 2.0 Risk Score in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Authors:  Roland Klingenberg; Soheila Aghlmandi; Lorenz Räber; Alexander Akhmedov; Baris Gencer; David Carballo; David Nanchen; Heiner C Bucher; Nicolas Rodondi; François Mach; Stephan Windecker; Ulf Landmesser; Arnold von Eckardstein; Christian W Hamm; Thomas F Lüscher; Christian M Matter
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Predictors of long-term symptom burden and quality of life in patients hospitalised with chest pain: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Nasir Saeed; Tone Merete Norekvål; Ole-Thomas Steiro; Hilde Lunde Tjora; Jørund Langørgen; Rune Oskar Bjørneklett; Øyvind Skadberg; Vernon Vijay Singha Bonarjee; Øistein Rønneberg Mjelva; Torbjørn Omland; Kjell Vikenes; Kristin Moberg Aakre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  MiR-32-3p Regulates Myocardial Injury Induced by Microembolism and Microvascular Obstruction by Targeting RNF13 to Regulate the Stability of Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Authors:  Dajun Huang; Yang Liu; Le Gao; Xiaomin Wei; Yuli Xu; Ruping Cai; Qiang Su
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  High-Sensitivitycardiac Troponinsin Cardio-Healthy Subjects: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Tar-Choon Aw; Wei-Ting Huang; Thu-Thao Le; Chee-Jian Pua; Briana Ang; Soon-Kieng Phua; Khung-Keong Yeo; Stuart A Cook; Calvin W L Chin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Biomarkers Associated with Cardiovascular Disease in COVID-19.

Authors:  Christoph C Kaufmann; Amro Ahmed; Achim Leo Burger; Marie Muthspiel; Bernhard Jäger; Johann Wojta; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.