Literature DB >> 27973927

Qualitative research in rehabilitation science: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.

Sandra VanderKaay1, Sandra E Moll1, Rebecca E Gewurtz1, Pranay Jindal1, Adalberto Loyola-Sanchez2, Tara L Packham3, Chun Y Lim4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Qualitative research has had a significant impact within rehabilitation science over time. During the past 20 years the number of qualitative studies published per year in Disability and Rehabilitation has markedly increased (from 1 to 54). In addition, during this period there have been significant changes in how qualitative research is conceptualized, conducted, and utilized to advance the field of rehabilitation. The purpose of this article is to reflect upon the progress of qualitative research within rehabilitation to date, to explicate current opportunities and challenges, and to suggest future directions to continue to strengthen the contribution of qualitative research in this field.
METHODS: Relevant literature searches were conducted in electronic data bases and reference lists. Pertinent literature was examined to identify current opportunities and challenges for qualitative research use in rehabilitation and to identify future directions.
RESULTS: Six key areas of opportunity and challenge were identified: (a) paradigm shifts, (b) advancements in methodology, (c) emerging technology, (d) advances in quality evaluation, (e) increasing popularity of mixed methods approaches, and (f) evolving approaches to knowledge translation. Two important future directions for rehabilitation are posited: (1) advanced training in qualitative methods and (2) engaging qualitative communities of research.
CONCLUSION: Qualitative research is well established in rehabilitation and has an important place in the continued growth of this field. Ongoing development of qualitative researchers and methods are essential. Implications for Rehabilitation Qualitative research has the potential to improve rehabilitation practice by addressing some of the most pervasive concerns in the field such as practitioner-client interaction, the subjective and lived experience of disability, and clinical reasoning and decision making. This will serve to better inform those providing rehabilitation services thereby benefiting patients that are utilizing these services. Changes over time in how qualitative research is conceptualized, conducted, and utilized to advance rehabilitation science have resulted in a number of unique opportunities and challenges in using qualitative research that must be considered within this field. Advances in methodology and increased expectations for evaluation must be considered to ensure quality and credibility of qualitative rehabilitation research within rehabilitation. Improved quality and credibility may increase likelihood of research dissemination and use by clinicians intervening within the rehabilitation process in order to improve clinical practice. In order to maximize opportunities and mitigate challenges there are two principal future directions for rehabilitation scientists to consider: (1) advancing training in qualitative methods to adequately prepare future rehabilitation scientists and (2) engaging qualitative communities of research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Qualitative; education; rehabilitation; research methods; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27973927     DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1261414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  9 in total

1.  Factors influencing participation in physical activity after dysvascular amputation: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Matthew J Miller; Jacqueline Jones; Chelsey B Anderson; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.033

2.  Living with spinal cord injury in Mongolia: A qualitative study on perceived environmental barriers.

Authors:  Delgerjargal Dorjbal; Birgit Prodinger; Claudia Zanini; Baljinnyam Avirmed; Gerold Stucki; Sara Rubinelli
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  The experiences of people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease during intensive balance training and the impact of the program: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Janelle Unger; Hardeep Singh; Avril Mansfield; Kei Masani; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.473

4.  A qualitative exploration of post-acute stroke participants' experiences of a multimodal intervention incorporating horseback riding.

Authors:  Petra Pohl; Gunnel Carlsson; Lina Bunketorp Käll; Michael Nilsson; Christian Blomstrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Experiences, needs, and preferences for follow-up after stroke perceived by people with stroke and healthcare professionals: A focus group study.

Authors:  Emma K Kjörk; Carlsson Gunnel; Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson; Katharina S Sunnerhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  What Does It Take for Research to Be Rehabilitation Research?

Authors:  Lena Aadal; Tove Lise Nielsen; Anders Bonde Jensen; Merete Bjerrum; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Sanne Angel
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Experiences from a multimodal rhythm and music-based rehabilitation program in late phase of stroke recovery - A qualitative study.

Authors:  Petra Pohl; Gunnel Carlsson; Lina Bunketorp Käll; Michael Nilsson; Christian Blomstrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using qualitative research perspectives to inform patient engagement in research.

Authors:  Michelle Phoenix; Tram Nguyen; Stephen J Gentles; Sandra VanderKaay; Andrea Cross; Linda Nguyen
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-07-06

9.  Integrating a gait analysis test in hospital rehabilitation: A service design approach.

Authors:  Javier Marín; Teresa Blanco; José J Marín; Alejandro Moreno; Elena Martitegui; Juan C Aragüés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.