Yui Matsuda1, Jada L Brooks2, Linda S Beeber2. 1. School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124. Electronic address: ymatsuda@miami.edu. 2. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite concerted efforts to establish health equity, significant disparities persist. One roadblock to eliminating health disparities is the inadequate recruitment of underserved populations, which prevents researchers from creating culturally-tailored interventions. To further develop the science of recruitment, we argue that a systematic approach should be applied to research participant recruitment. Given the lack of practical and comprehensive recruitment conceptual frameworks or guidelines in the literature, the authors propose newly synthesized guidelines for research recruitment of underserved populations: EERC (evaluate, engage, reflect, and carefully match). METHODS: The EERC guidelines are delineated, and the application of these guidelines is illustrated through a study recently conducted by the authors. RESULTS: The guidelines consist of the following four components: 1. Evaluate the composition of the research team; 2. Engage fully with the community by working with key informants and cultural insiders; 3. Reflect the unique cultural characteristics of the community in the research conduct; and 4. Carefully use a matching technique. The application component of the article demonstrates concrete examples of how the guidelines can enhance research recruitment for an underserved population. CONCLUSION: The authors intend these guidelines to be broadly applicable for research teams regardless of research design or characteristics of the underserved population. Application of these guidelines in nursing and health science will contribute to increasing research recruitment of underserved populations, with the goal of reducing health disparities and achieving health equity for all persons.
PURPOSE: Despite concerted efforts to establish health equity, significant disparities persist. One roadblock to eliminating health disparities is the inadequate recruitment of underserved populations, which prevents researchers from creating culturally-tailored interventions. To further develop the science of recruitment, we argue that a systematic approach should be applied to research participant recruitment. Given the lack of practical and comprehensive recruitment conceptual frameworks or guidelines in the literature, the authors propose newly synthesized guidelines for research recruitment of underserved populations: EERC (evaluate, engage, reflect, and carefully match). METHODS: The EERC guidelines are delineated, and the application of these guidelines is illustrated through a study recently conducted by the authors. RESULTS: The guidelines consist of the following four components: 1. Evaluate the composition of the research team; 2. Engage fully with the community by working with key informants and cultural insiders; 3. Reflect the unique cultural characteristics of the community in the research conduct; and 4. Carefully use a matching technique. The application component of the article demonstrates concrete examples of how the guidelines can enhance research recruitment for an underserved population. CONCLUSION: The authors intend these guidelines to be broadly applicable for research teams regardless of research design or characteristics of the underserved population. Application of these guidelines in nursing and health science will contribute to increasing research recruitment of underserved populations, with the goal of reducing health disparities and achieving health equity for all persons.
Authors: Holly J Falk-Krzesinski; Katy Börner; Noshir Contractor; Stephen M Fiore; Kara L Hall; Joann Keyton; Bonnie Spring; Daniel Stokols; William Trochim; Brian Uzzi Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: R P Strauss; S Sengupta; S C Quinn; J Goeppinger; C Spaulding; S M Kegeles; G Millett Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Linda S Beeber; Diane Holditch-Davis; Krista Perreira; Todd A Schwartz; Virginia Lewis; Hjordis Blanchard; Regina Canuso; Barbara Davis Goldman Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Raegan W Durant; Jennifer A Wenzel; Isabel C Scarinci; Debora A Paterniti; Mona N Fouad; Thelma C Hurd; Michelle Y Martin Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Consuelo H Wilkins; Mark Spofford; Neely Williams; Corliss McKeever; Shauntice Allen; Jen Brown; Jennifer Opp; Alan Richmond; A Hal Strelnick Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Jada L Brooks; Diane C Berry; Emily G Currin; Alasia Ledford; George J Knafl; Barbara L Fredrickson; Linda S Beeber; David B Peden; Giselle M Corbie-Smith Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Hayley Ryan; Rob Heywood; Oluseyi Jimoh; Anne Killett; Peter E Langdon; Ciara Shiggins; Karen Bunning Journal: Health Expect Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 3.377