Cinzia Imberti1, Samantha Y A Terry1, Carleen Cullinane2,3, Fiona Clarke4, Georgina H Cornish4, Nisha K Ramakrishnan1, Peter Roselt2, Andrew P Cope4, Rodney J Hicks2,3, Philip J Blower1, Michelle T Ma1. 1. King's College London , Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Fourth Floor Lambeth Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom. 2. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia. 3. Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne , Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. 4. King's College London , Academic Department of Rheumatology, Centre for Molecular and Cellular Biology of Inflammation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators conjugated to peptides can rapidly complex the positron-emitting isotope gallium-68 (68Ga) under mild conditions, and the resulting radiotracers can delineate peptide receptor expression at sites of diseased tissue in vivo. We have synthesized a dendritic bifunctional chelator containing nine 1,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one groups (SCN-HP9) that can coordinate up to three Ga3+ ions. This derivative has been conjugated to a trimeric peptide (RGD3) containing three peptide groups that target the αvβ3 integrin receptor. The resulting dendritic compound, HP9-RGD3, can be radiolabeled in 97% radiochemical yield at a 3-fold higher specific activity than its homologues HP3-RGD and HP3-RGD3 that contain only a single metal binding site. PET scanning and biodistribution studies show that [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] demonstrates higher receptor-mediated tumor uptake in animals bearing U87MG tumors that overexpress αvβ3 integrin than [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] and [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]. However, concomitant nontarget organ retention of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] results in low tumor to nontarget organ contrast in PET images. On the other hand, the trimeric peptide homologue containing a single tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelator, [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], clears nontarget organs and exhibits receptor-mediated uptake in mice bearing tumors and in mice with induced rheumatoid arthritis. PET imaging with [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] enables clear delineation of αvβ3 integrin receptor expression in vivo.
Tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators conjugated to peptides can rapidly complex the positron-emitting isotope gallium-68 (68Ga) under mild conditions, and the resulting radiotracers can delineate peptide receptor expression at sites of diseased tissue in vivo. We have synthesized a dendritic bifunctional chelator containing nine 1,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one groups (SCN-HP9) that can coordinate up to three Ga3+ ions. This derivative has been conjugated to a trimeric peptide (RGD3) containing three peptide groups that target the αvβ3 integrin receptor. The resulting dendritic compound, HP9-RGD3, can be radiolabeled in 97% radiochemical yield at a 3-fold higher specific activity than its homologues HP3-RGD and HP3-RGD3 that contain only a single metal binding site. PET scanning and biodistribution studies show that [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] demonstrates higher receptor-mediated tumor uptake in animals bearing U87MG tumors that overexpress αvβ3 integrin than [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] and [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]. However, concomitant nontarget organ retention of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] results in low tumor to nontarget organ contrast in PET images. On the other hand, the trimeric peptide homologue containing a single tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelator, [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], clears nontarget organs and exhibits receptor-mediated uptake in mice bearing tumors and in mice with induced rheumatoid arthritis. PET imaging with [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] enables clear delineation of αvβ3 integrin receptor expression in vivo.
Peptide-based imaging
agents in nuclear medicine have tremendous utility in diagnosis, prognosis,
and selection of therapeutic regimes for patients. Radiometals can
be incorporated into clinically relevant peptides via a bifunctional
chelator, providing effective and sensitive radiotracers that can
be prepared conveniently in a radiopharmacy. The metallic isotope 68Ga possesses decay properties that are suitable for positron
emission tomography (PET) (68 min half-life, 1899 keV β+ emission with 88% abundance), and the availability of a pharmaceutical
grade 68Ge/68Ga generator means that the number
of molecular imaging agents based on 68Ga is likely to
increase in the coming years. The somatostatin receptor 2-targeted
imaging agent, 68Ga-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors,[1−3] and more recently, the prostate specific membrane antigen targeted
conjugate, 68Ga-HBED-PSMA,[4,5] have demonstrated
clinical utility in patient prognosis and management. Other chelator
systems have exhibited efficient 68Ga3+ radiolabeling
properties, and the resulting radiolabeled conjugates are effective
at delineating target tissue in vivo.[6−12] Among these are the tripodal tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators containing
three 1,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one groups that can coordinate
radiometallic Ga3+ and Zr4+ ions,[13−15] as well as Fe3+ and Al3+ with high affinity.[16,17] Upon deprotonation of hydroxyl groups, the hexadentate O6 ligand, THP-Ac, can coordinate 68Ga3+ at mild
pH (pH 6.5–7.5) and low ligand concentrations (10 μM)
in <5 min.[13] Bifunctional derivatives
of THP-Ac can be attached to peptides, with the resulting conjugates
able to rapidly and quantitatively coordinate aqueous 68Ga3+ at room temperature at pH 5–7.[18,19]Multimeric peptide-based imaging agents that incorporate more
than one peptide targeting group (and in particular small peptides
that target the αvβ3 integrin receptor)
have demonstrated increased accumulation of activity at tissue targets
in vivo relative to their monomeric analogues, and are effective contrast
agents.[8,12,20−27] This increased accumulation of radiotracer in the case of multimeric
compounds can be attributed to either (i) divalent binding, where
two targeting peptides bind to two receptors simultaneously, requiring
sufficient distance between the two intramolecular targeting ligands
to form this bridge; or (ii) an increased local effective concentration
of targeting peptide at the receptor site, resulting in a shift in
equilibrium toward peptide receptor binding. In the case where the
multimeric derivative has an increased persistence in the blood pool
in vivo relative to the monomeric derivative, it is also possible
that increased uptake is a result of increased bioavailability.Dendritic and multimeric chelator systems for coordination of Gd3+ and lanthanides provide enhanced contrast as MRI agents
compared to their single-chelator counterparts, in large part due
to the increased number of metal complexes present.[28−36] Multimeric constructs containing multiple chelating groups (including
hydroxypyridinones) have also been synthesized for the purposes of
sequestering trace metal ions.[17,37] A small body of work
has been described in which the number of radiometal coordination
sites on a radiolabeled protein/antibody has been increased by incorporation
of either a dendrimer possessing multiple chelating groups,[38−41] or a pendant function (such as polylysine) on which multiple chelators
are appended.[42−44] In these cases, the functionalized/radiolabeled biomolecule
retained affinity for receptor targets in vitro[40,41,44] and in vivo.[38,39,42,43] Additionally, when
compared to bioconjugates containing fewer chelating groups, dendrimer
or multichelator conjugated proteins demonstrated higher specific
activity—that is, a higher number of radionuclides were bound
per bioconjugate compared to homologues containing a single chelator.[38,41−43] In some cases, this resulted in higher concentrations
of radioactivity at target tissue (tumors) in vivo.[42]We are interested in using tris(hydroxypyridinone)
ligands to explore new ways of increasing accumulated radioactivity
at diseased tissue where target receptors are localized in vivo. Here
we aim to incorporate multiple in vivo targeting peptide groups and
multiple chelator groups into a single molecule, thus increasing the
affinity of the radiolabeled conjugate for receptors in vivo as well
as increasing the specific activity of the radiolabeled species itself.
This approach mimics that of multifunctionalized nanoparticles, where
multiple copies of a targeting biomolecule/modifying agent and multiple
chelating groups are appended to the surface of a nanoparticle.[45−48] We have employed the cyclic pentapeptide, c(RGDfK), (Chart ) that targets the endothelial
αvβ3 integrin receptor expressed
in angiogenesis, and is associated with metastatic disease in cancers.
The biology of such conjugates is well understood, and derivatives
of c(RGDfK) are useful model compounds for assessing novel approaches
to molecular imaging using peptide-based agents.
Chart 1
We have synthesized
a novel bifunctional chelator construct that incorporates three hexadentate
tris(hydroxypyridinone) metal binding sites for Ga3+ and
an isothiocyanate group that can be utilized as an attachment point
to lysine residues of the N-terminus of peptides. We have also employed
a scaffold for facile attachment of three c(RGDfK) peptide targeting
groups that contain available Lys or N-terminal primary amine groups,
ultimately providing a trimeric targeting motif. Conjugating these
two motifs together results in a dendritic compound where an aryl
group links a trimeric peptide targeting group and three tris(hydroxypyridinone) (THP) groups. We have also synthesized homologues of this
compound to investigate the effect of incorporating multiple copies
of a peptide/chelating group on in vitro uptake and in vivo biodistribution
and target tissue accumulation. Finally, we have chosen the radiotracer
with the best in vivo tumor to nontarget organ contrast and assessed
the radiotracer in a model of rheumatoid arthritis to further illustrate
the utility of 68Ga-labeled THP conjugates that target
integrin receptors for molecular imaging of in vivo events.
Results
Synthesis
To synthesize a multidentate chelator containing nine 1,6-dimethyl-3-hydroxypyridin-4-one
groups (as three tris(hydroxypyridinone) moieties), the benzyl-protected
tris(hydroxypyridinone) (2) (3 equiv) was reacted with
tricarboxylate (1), HATU, and diisopropylethylamine under
microwave conditions (Scheme ). The resulting compound (3) was purified using
silica chromatography. Subsequent removal of the phthalimide group
furnished 4, which possesses a primary amine that can
be further functionalized for attachment to biomolecules. This species
was converted to a phenyl isothiocyanate by reacting it with an excess
of p-phenylene diisothiocyanate, resulting in 5, which was isolated via semipreparative reverse phase HPLC.
Compound SCN-HP9 was obtained upon deprotection of the
benzyl-protected hydroxypyridinone groups by reaction of 5 with boron trichloride in dichloromethane, followed by addition
of methanol.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of SCN-HP9
This study aimed to assess a trimeric scaffold
in which all three peptide motifs are equidistant from the bifunctional
chelator and chemically equivalent to each other, thus ensuring that
all three motifs possess the same affinity for the target receptor.
To achieve this, tricarboxylate 1 was converted to a N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated intermediate (6) which was reacted with 3 equiv of c(RGDfK), to provide the multimeric
compound 7. Compound 7 was purified and
isolated using RP-HPLC. The phthalimide group was removed by reaction
with hydrazine in ethanol, followed by addition of HCl (Scheme ). Subsequently, RGD3, which contains three c(RGDfK) peptide groups and an apical primary
amine, was isolated using RP-HPLC.
Scheme 2
Synthesis of RGD3
Reaction of RGD3 with SCN-HP9 at 120 °C at 300 W in a microwave reactor
provided HP9-RGD3 (Chart ) which was purified and isolated using RP-HPLC
in ≥95% purity. HP9-RGD3 possesses three
c(RGDfK) groups and three tris(hydroxypyridinone) groups, each attached
through a tripodal scaffold to a central phenyl group via thiourea
linkages. Similarly, the compound SCN-HP3 (Chart ), synthesized as previously
described,[18] was reacted with (i) RGD3 and (ii) c(RGDfK) under the same microwave conditions. This
provided the derivatives HP3-RGD3 and HP3-RGD (Chart ) which are trimeric and monomeric c(RGDfK) homologues of HP9-RGD3, the former two conjugates containing only
a single tris(hydroxypyridinone) ligand for coordination of a single
metal ion. These conjugates were also purified using RP-HPLC and isolated
in ≥95% purity (as previously reported for HP3-RGD[18]).
Reaction of Hydroxypyridinone Derivatives
with 68Ga3+/Ga3+
Solutions of HP9-RGD3, HP3-RGD3, and HP3-RGD were added to an
excess of natGa(NO3)3. For each of
these solutions, the reverse phase LCMS total ion chromatogram revealed
Ga3+ complexation of the hydroxypyridinone conjugates (Figure ). As predicted,
the conjugate HP9-RGD3 that contains nine hydroxypyridinone
groups (three hexadentate tris(hydroxypyridinone) groups) coordinated
three Ga3+ metal ions, whereas the conjugates HP3-RGD3 and HP3-RGD, each possessing
only a single tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelator, were bound to only
a single Ga3+ ion. In each case, the most intense set of
peaks in the mass spectrum (Figure ) corresponding to this chromatographic signal matched
the stoichiometry of the complexes of formulas listed in Table .
Figure 1
Radio-HPLC chromatogram
of 68Ga-labeled peptide conjugates (bottom, black traces),
and total ion count LCMS chromatograms of Ga-complexed peptide conjugates acquired using the same mobile
phase conditions (middle, blue traces); mass spectral signals associated
with each LCMS chromatographic signal (top, black—experimental
signal, red—calculated signal): (a) [Ga(HP3-RGD)],
(b) [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], (c) [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)].
Table 1
Observed and Calculated m/z Values
for Mass Spectral Signals of [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)], HPLC Retention Times of Ga Labeled Conjugates, and Log D values of 68Ga Labeled Conjugates
compound
stoichiometry of observed MS
signal
observed (and calculated) m/z (monoisotopic)
LCMS retention
time (min)
radio-HPLC retention time
(min)
log DOCT/PBS (±SD)
[nat/68Ga(HP3-RGD)]
C72H94N19O17S2Ga + 2H+
815.80 (815.80)
9.00
8.38
–2.62 ± 0.05
[nat/68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
C139H192N39O25S2Ga + 3H+
1034.45 (1034.45)
9.05
8.37
–2.23 ± 0.05
[natGa3/68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]
C226H306N57O59S2Ga3 + 4H+
1259.26 (1259.25)
8.88
8.32
–2.05 ± 0.19
Radio-HPLC chromatogram
of 68Ga-labeled peptide conjugates (bottom, black traces),
and total ion count LCMS chromatograms of Ga-complexed peptide conjugates acquired using the same mobile
phase conditions (middle, blue traces); mass spectral signals associated
with each LCMS chromatographic signal (top, black—experimental
signal, red—calculated signal): (a) [Ga(HP3-RGD)],
(b) [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], (c) [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)].Solutions of 68Ga3+ produced
from a 68Ge/68Ga generator (80–120 MBq
mL–1, 0.1 M HCl aqueous solution, 1 mL) were added
to HP9-RGD3, HP3-RGD3,
and HP3-RGD and immediately adjusted to pH 6 by addition
of ammonium acetate solution (1 M, 300 μL). As previously described,[18,19] these radiolabeling reactions proceeded rapidly at room temperature
in less than 5 min, providing radiolabeled conjugates in >98% radiochemical
yield. These mixtures were analyzed using the same HPLC conditions
as those employed for the above LCMS studies. Each reaction solution
gave rise to only a single signal in the radiochromatogram, each with
a similar retention time to corresponding LCMS chromatogram signals
(Figure , Table ). Under these conditions,
the maximum occupancy of bioconjugate molecules by 68Ga3+ was low—for HP9-RGD3, maximum
occupancy was <0.03%, and for HP3-RGD3 or
HP3-RGD, maximum occupancy was <0.01%.To discern
whether [Ga(HP9-RGD3)] could be chromatographically
distinguished from [Ga2(HP9-RGD3)]
and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)], solutions of HP9-RGD3 were added to aqueous solutions containing 1, 2,
or 3 equiv of Ga3+, and the samples were analyzed by reverse
phase LCMS coupled to a UV detector (Figure ) using a less steep solvent gradient than
that employed above. [Note: To avoid confusion over the oxidation
state of the metal and the pH being monitored, we adopt normal convention
in showing peptides as neutral or uncharged ligands either alone or
in metal complexes, even though Arg/R side chains are protonated in
water at pH < 9, and Asp/D side chains are deprotonated at pH >
5. Additionally, we have elected not to indicate the protonation state
of HP groups in our nomenclature, even though at pH < 4.5 in water,
HP groups are protonated bearing a single positive charge, and >8
HP groups are deprotonated bearing a single negative charge. At pH
5–7.5 in water, HP groups are neutral. Upon coordination to
a metal ion, each bidentate HP group is deprotonated, formally bearing
a single negative charge. Thus, HP3 and HP9 groups
and trivalent metal complexes thereof are uncharged at pH 5–7.5
in aqueous solutions.] When an analytical HPLC column was utilized
for LCMS analysis, the UV chromatogram of non-Ga-treated HP9-RGD3 revealed at least three species (Figure b). The mass spectrum indicated
that these species corresponded to [Al(HP9-RGD3)], [AlFe(HP9-RGD3)], [Fe(HP9-RGD3)], and [Fe2(HP9-RGD3)] (Figure b). It is likely
that the metal ions that gave rise to these complexes came from storage
vials and/or parts of the LCMS instrumentation, including the analytical
reverse phase C18 column. Notably, samples of HP9-RGD3 isolated immediately after preparative HPLC that were not
passed through an analytical HPLC column, nor lyophilized and stored
for extended periods of time, contained fewer metal complex species,
as measured by mass spectrometry (Figure a), although the [Al(HP9-RGD3)] complex was still prominent.
Figure 2
(a) Mass spectrum (right)
of HP9-RGD3 acquired immediately after preparative
HPLC purification (without analytical HPLC separation). Analytical
HPLC UV chromatograms (left) and mass spectra (right) of solutions
of HP9-RGD3 with (b) no added Ga3+, (c) 1 equiv of Ga3+, (d) 2 equiv of Ga3+,
(e) 3 equiv of Ga3+, (f) 68Ga generator eluate;
(g) HPLC radiochromatogram (left) of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]. Charge of mass spectral ions (z) = 4+.
(a) Mass spectrum (right)
of HP9-RGD3 acquired immediately after preparative
HPLC purification (without analytical HPLC separation). Analytical
HPLC UV chromatograms (left) and mass spectra (right) of solutions
of HP9-RGD3 with (b) no added Ga3+, (c) 1 equiv of Ga3+, (d) 2 equiv of Ga3+,
(e) 3 equiv of Ga3+, (f) 68Ga generator eluate;
(g) HPLC radiochromatogram (left) of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]. Charge of mass spectral ions (z) = 4+.In solutions containing a single
equivalent of Ga3+, the major Ga-containing species corresponded
to [Ga(HP9-RGD3)] and [AlGa(HP9-RGD3)], and the corresponding UV chromatograms indicated the presence
of multiple species (Figure c). In solutions containing 2 equiv of Ga3+, several
Ga-containing species could be detected including [AlGa(HP9-RGD3)], [FeGa(HP9-RGD3)], [Ga2(HP9-RGD3)], [AlFeGa(HP9-RGD3)], [AlGa2(HP9-RGD3)], and
[Fe2Ga(HP9-RGD3)] (Figure d). Similarly, the corresponding
UV chromatogram indicated the presence of multiple species. Lastly,
when 3 equiv of Ga3+ were added to HP9-RGD3, only two Ga-containing species were observed: [FeGa2(HP9-RGD3)] and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] (Figure e). Only two significant signals were discernible in
the UV chromatogram.The same “slow” LCMS gradient
coupled to UV detection was used to analyze a sample nominally described
here as [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] (Figure f,g). The concentration
of 68Ga was too low to allow detection of 68Ga-containing species using the mass spectrometer available in our
laboratory. The species of lowest molecular weight most closely matched
stoichiometries of [AlFe(HP9-RGD3)], [Fe2(HP9-RGD3)], and [FeGa(HP9-RGD3)]. Unlike samples of HP9-RGD3, neither [Al(HP9-RGD3)] nor [Fe(HP9-RGD3)] was detected. Generator eluate is known to contain
significant amounts of Fe3+,[49] and it is likely that HP9-RGD3 complexes this
during the radiolabeling reaction. Indeed, unpublished data from our
laboratory indicate that concentrations of Fe, Al, and Ga in generator eluate (0.1 M HCl, from an Eckert
and Ziegler generator) are approximately 0.5 μM, 3 μM,
and 1 μM, respectively. At these concentrations, Fe3+, Al3+, and Ga3+ will compete with 68Ga3+ (present at picomolar
concentrations) for ligand coordination, accounting for low percentage
occupancy by 68Ga3+ of all three conjugates.
Most importantly, the radiolabeled species in solution, referred to
as [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] for the purposes
of simple nomenclature, most likely corresponds to [M268Ga(HP9-RGD3)] or [M68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] (M = Al, Fe, or Ga). Thus, in vivo studies, described herein, measure the biodistribution
of 68Ga-labeled HP9-RGD3 in which
one or two tris(hydroxypyridinone) sites are occupied by nonradioactive
metal ions. The resolution of the scintillation detector was lower
than the resolution of the UV detector, and using the same gradient,
the radiochromatogram of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] gave rise to a single, very broad peak, coincident with the UV
chromatogram signals.Significantly higher amounts of 68Ga3+ were utilized to assess the maximum specific activity
that could be complexed quantitatively by the conjugates. In this
procedure, 68Ga3+ eluted from an iThemba generator
was processed to preconcentrate the generator eluate and remove 68Ge breakthrough.[50] The final 68Ga3+ solution consisted of 700–1000 MBq 68Ga3+ in H2O/ethanol (82%/18%, with
[HCl] = 0.18 M, total volume = 1 mL). The conjugates HP9-RGD3, HP3-RGD3, and HP3-RGD were added to this solution followed by ammonium acetate and
saline to obtain solutions (2.5 mL total volume) at pH 5.5–6.5
that were suitable for in vivo administration. Radiochemical yields
of >97% were achieved using a minimum of 4 nmol of HP9-RGD3 and 12 nmol of either HP3-RGD3 or HP3-RGD. Decreasing the amount of either HP3-RGD3 or HP3-RGD to 4 nmol decreased the radiochemical
yield (86% and 88%, respectively). Again, these reactions proceeded
rapidly (<5 min) at room temperature, illustrating the utility
of tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators for applications requiring rapid,
kit-based labeling. The maximum specific activity of 68Ga-labeled HP9-RGD3 (180–240 MBq nmol–1) compared with that of HP3-RGD3 or HP3-RGD (60–80 MBq nmol–1) was 3-fold higher. The maximum occupancy by 68Ga3+ per molecule of bioconjugate was low in all cases. For HP9-RGD3, maximum occupancy was <0.3%, and for
HP3-RGD3 or HP3-RGD, maximum occupancy
was <0.1%.
Hydrophilicity of 68Ga-Radiolabeled
Tracers, and Affinity for αvβ3 Integrin
Receptor
The log DOCT/PBS values
of the 68Ga-labeled conjugates indicated that all three
radiotracers possess comparable hydrophilicity (Table ), with log D values all
in the range of −2.7 to −2.0. These data are consistent
with the similar reverse-phase HPLC retention times observed for all
three radiotracers.The half-maximal inhibitory concentration
(IC50) values of c(RGDfK), [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] were determined using a cell-free solid-phase competitive
binding assay with 125I-echistatin. Binding of 125I-echistatin to αvβ3 integrin was
inhibited by all compounds in a concentration-dependent manner broadly
indicating that [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] retained
affinity for αvβ3 integrin (Table , Figure S1). The IC50 value of [Ga(HP3-RGD)] (46 ± 16 nM) was comparable to that of c(RGDfK) (28 ±
8 nM), demonstrating that conjugation did not markedly affect affinity
for the αvβ3 integrin receptor.
However, the IC50 values of [Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (73 ± 22 nM) and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] (79 ± 28 nM) were higher than those of c(RGDfK) and
[Ga(HP3-RGD)], suggesting that, in this series of compounds,
the presence of three copies of c(RGDfK) peptide on a single molecule
did not impart higher affinity toward αvβ3 integrin compared to the monomeric THP derivative. This was
surprising given that it has been reported that other dimeric,[22,23] trimeric,[27] and multimeric[51] RGD peptides demonstrate higher affinities for
αvβ3 integrin than their monomeric
homologues. The addition of the dendritic HP9 chelator
did not affect affinity of RGD3 for αvβ3 integrin—IC50 values of [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] and [Ga3(HP3-RGD3)] were very similar.
Table 2
IC50 Values for c(RGDfK), [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)], Determined Using a Solid-Phase Competitive Binding Assay
with 125I-Echistatin
compound
IC50 (nM) (±standard error)
95% confidence
interval (nM)
c(RGDfK)
28 ± 8
12–45
[Ga(HP3-RGD)]
46 ± 16
13–79
[Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
73 ± 22
30–116
[Ga3(HP9-RGD3)]
79 ± 28
23–134
Biodistribution of 68Ga-Labeled RGD Conjugates
The biodistribution of
[68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]
was assessed in Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing αvβ3 integrin-positive glioblastoma U87MG tumors (n = 3). Each animal was administered 18–33 MBq of 68Ga-labeled tracer and PET scanned at either 1 or 2 h post-injection
(PI) for 10 min, followed immediately by euthanasia and organ harvesting
for ex vivo radioactivity counting. To assess specificity of each
radiotracer, a separate group of animals was coadministered c(RGDfK)
(0.4 mg per animal) with the tracer, followed by scanning, euthanasia,
and ex vivo organ counting 1 h PI.Ex vivo biodistribution data
(Figures and S2, and Tables , 4, and S1) demonstrated that tumor uptake of dendritic [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] was 1.75-fold higher than that
of monomeric [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] at 1 h PI. Tumor
uptake of trimeric [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] was 1.49-fold higher than that of [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]. Tumor uptake of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] was higher than that of [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], but this was not statistically significant. By 2 h PI,
there were no differences in normalized tumor uptake between the three
tracers.
Figure 3
(a) Ex vivo biodistribution of mice bearing αvβ3 integrin-positive U87MG tumors administered (a-i)
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)], (a-ii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and (a-iii) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], 1 and 2 h PI, and 1 h PI of coadministered c(RGDfK)
(blocked); n = 3. Error bars correspond to standard
error of the mean. (b) Representative PET maximum intensity projections
of Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing a U87MG tumor on right flanks at 1 h
PI of (b-i) [68Ga(HP3-RGD)], (b-ii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] + c(RGDfK), (b-iii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], (b-iv) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] + c(RGDfK), (b-v) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], and (b-vi) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] + c(RGDfK). Red arrow indicates position of tumors on animals.
Table 3
αvβ3 Integrin-Positive
U87MG Tumor Uptake as Measured by Ex Vivo Biodistribution, 1 h PI,
and 1 h PI of Coadministered c(RGDfK) (Blocked); n = 3
compound
1 h PI, %ID g-1 (±SEM)
with block, 1 h PI, %ID g-1 (±SEM)
mean difference
(95% CI), %ID g-1
p value
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)]
2.86 ± 0.43
0.99 ± 0.12
1.88
(0.86–2.90)
0.0069
[68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
4.28 ± 0.53
0.98 ± 0.14
3.29 (2.04–4.54)
0.0019
[68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]
4.69 ± 0.35
1.17 ± 0.11
3.52 (2.68–4.37)
0.0003
Table 4
Differences in Tumor
Uptake of 68Ga-Tracers 1 h PI, as Measured by Ex Vivo
Biodistribution
comparison
mean difference 1 h PI (95%
CI), %ID g-1
p value
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)] and [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
1.42 (−0.14–2.97)
0.065
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)] and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]
1.83 (0.56–3.10)
0.016
[68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]
0.41 (−1.04–1.86)
0.473
(a) Ex vivo biodistribution of mice bearing αvβ3 integrin-positive U87MG tumors administered (a-i)
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)], (a-ii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and (a-iii) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], 1 and 2 h PI, and 1 h PI of coadministered c(RGDfK)
(blocked); n = 3. Error bars correspond to standard
error of the mean. (b) Representative PET maximum intensity projections
of Balb/c nu/nu mice bearing a U87MG tumor on right flanks at 1 h
PI of (b-i) [68Ga(HP3-RGD)], (b-ii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] + c(RGDfK), (b-iii) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], (b-iv) [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] + c(RGDfK), (b-v) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], and (b-vi) [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] + c(RGDfK). Red arrow indicates position of tumors on animals.Animals administered [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] showed increased persistence
of activity in blood, and increased liver, spleen, muscle, and lung
accumulation compared to animals administered either [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] or [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] at both 1 and 2 h PI (Figure , Table S1). At both 1 and
2 h PI, the concentration of kidney activity for animals administered
[68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] (1 h PI, 28.32 ±
3.76%ID g–1) was considerably higher than that of
animals administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (1 h PI, 10.73 ± 0.18%ID g–1), which in
turn was higher than that of animals administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] (1 h PI, 4.91 ± 0.74%ID g–1).Additionally, ex vivo biodistribution data (Figures and S2, Table ) for all three tracers
demonstrated that tumor uptake was target-specific at 1 h PI, with
significantly lower tumor uptake for animals coadministered c(RGDfK)
(“blocked” groups). In the blocked groups for all three
tracers, uptake in lungs, heart, spleen, and muscle was generally
lower than that observed in “nonblocked” groups. This
is consistent with previous reports of receptor-mediated uptake of
αvβ3 integrin targeted radiotracers,[18,22,25,27] and with the expression of αvβ3 integrin at low levels in normal vasculature tissue.[52,53] For all three tracers, radioactivity concentration in the kidneys
was higher for the blocked groups than for the nonblocked groups.
Similar patterns have previously been described for RGD peptide conjugates,[11] and have been attributed to slower kidney filtration
rates in the presence of larger amounts of peptide.PET imaging
data for all three tracers was consistent with ex vivo biodistribution
data. In PET scans of all three radiotracers acquired 1 h PI, tumors
could be delineated, whereas in PET scans of animals coadministered
c(RGDfK), tumors could not be delineated (Figure ). Concentration of radioactivity in kidneys
and livers for animals administered [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] was significantly higher than that of animals
administered either [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] or [68Ga(HP3-RGD)].Thus, although
tumor uptake of dendritic [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] was higher at 1 h PI than that of either [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] or [68Ga(HP3-RGD)], high nontarget organ uptake of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] rendered tumor to nontarget organ ratios significantly
lower than that of either [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] or [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] at 1 h PI. Contrast
between tumor and nontarget organs was best achieved with [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (Figure S3); therefore, further imaging studies assessing αvβ3 integrin expression in a mouse model of rheumatoid
arthritis utilized this tracer.
Imaging Arthritis with
[68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
To demonstrate
the broad utility of tris(hydroxypyridinone) conjugates for molecular
imaging of αvβ3 integrin receptor
expression, [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] was
used to image synovial inflammation in mice with induced rheumatoid
arthritis. The αvβ3 integrin receptor
is associated with cell types that are involved in rheumatoid arthritis
at synovial joints, including bone resorbing osteoclasts, activated
macrophages, and angiogenic endothelial cells.[53,54] Previous studies have demonstrated that radiolabeled RGD peptides
target arthritic tissue[55−57] as well as osteoclasts.[58]In these experiments, [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–13 MBq) was administered to healthy
mice (C57Bl/6 male 6–8 week mice), and mice with induced mild
and severe rheumatoid arthritis.[59,60] A separate
group of animals with severe rheumatoid arthritis was administered
both [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and an excess
of c(RGDfK) to assess specificity of in vivo targeted accumulation.
Prior to induction of arthritis and administration of radiotracer,
the diameters of wrist and ankle joints of all animals were measured
using calipers to score the severity of arthritis. At 1 h PI of radiotracer,
animals were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation followed by
PET scanning and organ collection for ex vivo biodistribution.For all animals, radioactivity concentrations in nontarget tissues
and organs, as determined by ex vivo biodistribution data (Figure S4), were consistent with results obtained
from animals bearing U87MG tumors administered the same radiotracer.
Blockade studies with c(RGDfK) in rheumatoid arthritis animals also
indicated that some localization of [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] in all harvested organs except the kidneys was
likely to be receptor-mediated (Table S2).The ex vivo biodistribution data demonstrated that the amount
of radioactivity in severely arthritic joints (increase in wrist and
ankle diameter >0.5 mm) was higher than that in joints of healthy
animals, or in joints of animals with mild arthritis (increase in
wrist and ankle diameter <0.5 mm). In this analysis, joints were
grouped according to their type (wrist or ankle) and the increase
in swelling (caliper joint measurements) from point of disease induction
to the point of imaging (8 days). Total %ID is reported rather than
%ID g–1, because of the large experimental error
associated with dissecting and measuring the mass of mouse joint tissue.
In severely arthritic joints, there was significantly higher radioactivity
accumulation than in joints that were not classified as severely arthritic
(including healthy animals and animals induced with mild arthritis)
(Figure , Table ). On the basis of
%ID, severely arthritic joints could be differentiated from healthy
joints, or joints that did not exhibit severe inflammation. Furthermore,
blockade studies in severely arthritic animals demonstrated that uptake
of [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] in inflamed arthritic
joints was receptor-mediated (Figure , Table ). Joint uptake in severely arthritic animals coadministered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and c(RGDfK) peptide was significantly
lower than that of severely arthritic animals administered solely
[68Ga(HP3-RGD3)].
Figure 4
Ex vivo biodistribution
of arthritic joints of healthy mice (blue), mice with induced mild
rheumatoid arthritis (red) and mice with induced severe rheumatoid
arthritis (green), administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–13 MBq). A blockade study was also undertaken
in mice with induced severe rheumatoid arthritis, in which [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] was coadministered with cRGDfK
(pink). Top: %ID in feet/ankle joints; bottom: %ID in hand/wrist joints.
Increase in swelling of joints was measured as the increase from the
point of induction of arthritis to PET scanning/biodistribution studies
(8 days).
Table 5
Ex Vivo Biodistribution
of Joints of Mice Administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]
group
%ID 1 h PI (±SEM)
mean difference (95% CI) compared to severely arthritic joints, %ID
p value
Wrists
severely arthritic (>0.5
mm increase)
0.26 ± 0.02
-
-
severely
arthritic with block
0.08 ± 0.01
0.18 (0.16–0.20)
<0.0001
healthy or mildly arthritic (<0.5 mm increase)
0.14 ± 0.02
0.12 (0.09–0.14)
<0.0001
Ankles
severely arthritic (>0.5 mm increase)
0.68 ± 0.18
-
-
severely arthritic with
block
0.24 ± 0.02
0.44 (0.27–0.63)
0.0005
healthy or mildly arthritic (<0.5 mm increase)
0.29 ± 0.03
0.39 (0.30–0.50)
<0.0001
Ex vivo biodistribution
of arthritic joints of healthy mice (blue), mice with induced mild
rheumatoid arthritis (red) and mice with induced severe rheumatoid
arthritis (green), administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–13 MBq). A blockade study was also undertaken
in mice with induced severe rheumatoid arthritis, in which [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] was coadministered with cRGDfK
(pink). Top: %ID in feet/ankle joints; bottom: %ID in hand/wrist joints.
Increase in swelling of joints was measured as the increase from the
point of induction of arthritis to PET scanning/biodistribution studies
(8 days).When animals’ joints were
grouped according to extent of disease (classified according to whether
animals were induced with mild or severe arthritis rather than increase
in joint swelling), there were no statistically significant differences
in joint uptake between healthy mice and mice with mild arthritis.
There were statistically significant differences between healthy mice
and mice with severe arthritis, and between mice with mild arthritis
and those with severe arthritis (Figure S5, Table S3).PET scans were consistent with biodistribution data
(Figure ). In PET
images acquired 1 h PI, severely arthritic joints could be distinguished
from joints that were not inflamed, both between different animals
(Figure a vs b) and
within the same animal (Figure b). For example, within one animal with severe arthritis,
the left wrist was severely inflamed (a 1 mm increase in swelling
from the point of disease induction) but the right demonstrated no
swelling throughout the disease induction period. In the PET/CT scan,
higher radiotracer uptake was discernible in the left wrist compared
to the right wrist (Figure b), consistent with ex vivo biodistribution data.
Figure 5
PET/CT maximum
intensity projections of mice administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–13 MBq) 1 h PI (all PET images
scaled from 0.08 to 8.0%ID g–1): (a) a healthy C57Bl/6
mouse; (b) a C57Bl/6 mouse with severe rheumatoid arthritis; (c) a
C57Bl/6 mouse with severe rheumatoid arthritis coadministered c(RGDfK).
Arrows indicate joints with an increase in swelling >0.5 mm.
PET/CT maximum
intensity projections of mice administered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–13 MBq) 1 h PI (all PET images
scaled from 0.08 to 8.0%ID g–1): (a) a healthy C57Bl/6
mouse; (b) a C57Bl/6 mouse with severe rheumatoid arthritis; (c) a
C57Bl/6 mouse with severe rheumatoid arthritis coadministered c(RGDfK).
Arrows indicate joints with an increase in swelling >0.5 mm.
Discussion and Concluding
Remarks
Multimeric receptor-targeted radiolabeled agents,
in which each molecule contains either multiple copies of each targeting
peptide, or multiple copies of a multidentate chelator,[42] can deliver increased radioactive payloads to
target tissue relative to monomeric homologues. Dimeric,[25,61−63] trimeric,[8,27] tetrameric,[64,65] and octameric[66] RGD conjugates radiolabeled
with metallic PET isotopes have demonstrated efficacious αvβ3 integrin targeting in vivo. Herein, we
have described the first radiolabeled molecular compound that integrates
multiple copies of a chelator and multiple copies of peptide, in this
case, αvβ3 integrin-targeted c(RGDfK).
In contrast to previous work on multimeric RGD peptide conjugates,
the new dendritic system possesses tris(hydroxypyridinone) chelators
that coordinate 68Ga3+ quantitatively at ambient
temperature, near neutral pH, and micromolar concentrations of conjugate,
allowing for rapid, one-step labeling.Synthesis of HP9-RGD3, which consists of a bifunctional enneakis(hydroxypyridinone)
ligand attached to a trimeric peptide targeting αvβ3 integrin receptors, enabled assessment of whether
dendritic chelator systems could enhance specific activity in radiolabeled
molecular imaging agents. Incorporation of multiple hexadentate tris(hydroxypyridinone)
groups into a single construct, HP9-RGD3, increased
specific activity relative to HP3 derivatives. At concentrations
of ∼1.6 μM, near-quantitative radiochemical yields (>97%)
were achieved for HP9-RGD3, whereas for HP3-RGD and HP3-RGD3, concentrations of
5 μM were required to achieve the same radiochemical yields.
The maximum specific activity of 68Ga-labeled HP9-RGD3 (180–240 MBq nmol–1) was
3-fold higher when compared with that of HP3-RGD3 or HP3-RGD (60–80 MBq nmol–1).Analytical HPLC using a UV detector (interfaced with a mass
spectrometer and a gamma scintillation detector) could distinguish
numerous signals arising from a sample of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]. For the same sample, line widths of signals
in the radiochromatogram and the TIC chromatograms were much broader,
and could not be precisely correlated with individual signals in the
UV chromatogram. Mass spectral analysis indicated that all tris(hydroxypyridinone)
sites in [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] were likely
occupied by trivalent metal ions. Hexadentate THP-Ac has a very high
affinity for Fe3+, with log K1 = 32.52 and pFe3+ = 28.47 at pH 7.4 ([Fe3+] = 10–6 M, [Ligand] = 10–5 M).[17] Dendritic derivatives have similar affinities.[17] While affinities of 3-hydroxy-4-pyridinones
for Al3+ are normally several orders of magnitude lower
than for Fe3+, they are still high—for example,
for a series of tripodal tris(hydroxypyridinones), pAl3+ consistently measured 21–22 at pH 7.4.[16] It is unsurprising that in 68Ga-labeled HP9-RGD3, tris(hydroxypyridinone) sites unoccupied
by 68Ga3+ complex adventitious Fe3+, Al3+, and Ga3+.It was hypothesized that the higher specific activity and
the trimeric peptide nature of [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] might result in targeted tumor delivery of a comparatively
higher radioactive payload per molecule of receptor-bound bioconjugate
compared to [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and
[68Ga(HP3-RGD)].Despite the lower IC50 value of the monomeric [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]
species, its in vivo normalized tumor accumulation (as measured by
ex vivo biodistribution) was lower than that of trimeric [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and dendritic [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] at 1 h PI (Figure ). The radiotracers’ pharmacokinetics
as well as αvβ3 integrin affinities
are likely to be important in influencing their relative tumor uptake.
It is possible that in vivo, blood clearance of [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] was faster than that of [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] at early time points (before 1 h PI), resulting in higher tumor
bioavailability and thus higher uptake of [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] 1 h PI. Additionally, for HP9-RGD3, it is likely that there was comparatively lower occupancy of target
αvβ3 integrin in vivo by unlabeled
conjugate. Comparable amounts of radioactivity were administered to
each mouse for the three different radiotracers, but in the case of
HP9-RGD3, ∼0.15 nmol of conjugate was
administered to each animal, compared to ∼0.5 nmol for HP3-RGD3 and HP3-RGD.There was an
increase in radioactivity concentration in tumors at 1 h PI for [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] compared to [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (mean difference = 0.41%ID g–1), and for [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] compared to [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] (mean
difference = 1.42%ID g–1) (Tables , 4). There was a
statistically significant increase (mean difference = 1.83%ID g–1) in tumor accumulation at 1 h PI for [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] compared to [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]. Thus, the combination of increased
specific activity and a multimeric effect could be responsible for
this increase in radioactivity concentration in tumors of animals
administered the dendritic radiotracer. Such an observation lends
credence to the hypothesis that dendritic radiotracers that incorporate
multiple chelating groups and copies of targeting peptides can increase
radioactive payload at tissue, relative to monomeric homologues. The
higher mean difference in tumor uptake between [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] and [68Ga(HP3-RGD)],
compared to [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] and
[68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], suggests that the
presence of a multimeric peptide is the more significant of the two
factors in enhancing tumor uptake.The distance between c(RGDfK)
groups in HP3-RGD3 and HP9-RGD3 is not sufficient to allow simultaneous binding to two or
more αvβ3 integrin receptors. It
is possible that increasing this distance to allow simultaneous binding
could result in higher uptake and retention in tissue that overexpresses
αvβ3 integrin receptors.[62,63]We have previously demonstrated that THP peptide conjugates
can rapidly and quantitatively complex 68Ga3+ at near-neutral pH, ambient temperature, and low chelator concentrations,
and that the resulting radiotracers can delineate tumor tissue in
vivo.[18,19] [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], prepared using simple radiolabeling procedures, can image
synovial inflammation in mice with induced rheumatoid arthritis, distinguishing
severely arthritic joints from disease-free joints. Few data are available
on αvβ3 integrin targeted radiotracers
for rheumatoid arthritis,[55,56] and the mouse models
employed in previously published studies differ from the model utilized
here. However, we note that [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] uptake in severely arthritic synovial joints of mice in
a serum transfer-induced arthritis model (0.26 ± 0.02%ID in wrists
and 0.68 ± 0.18%ID in ankles 1 h PI) is comparable to 111In-DOTA-E(RGDfK)2 uptake in mice in a collagen-induced
arthritis model (0.2 ± 0.1%ID in arthritic joints at 1 h PI).[55]Rheumatoid arthritis is currently diagnosed
using information from physical examination (signs and symptoms),
blood tests, X-rays, and MRI. Ideally, it is diagnosed early so that
treatment that slows or halts disease progression can begin. Current
early diagnostic methods detect anatomical changes in patients’
joints and so arthritic sites in patients that are not symptomatic
or visually identifiable are missed.[67,68] PET/CT imaging
of αvβ3 integrin expression using
kit-based radiopharmaceuticals could provide whole-body diagnosis
at early stages of disease before the manifestation of debilitating
symptoms, as well as monitor patient response throughout treatment,
providing greater effectiveness of treatment at early stages of disease.
Such radiotracers could also be used to predict whether an individual
patient will respond to a particular molecular therapeutic, based
on the presence of a therapeutic receptor target. The availability
of 68Ga from a benchtop generator, coupled with a chelator
conjugate that enables one-step, kit-based syntheses, which are not
readily achievable with other chelators, brings about the possibility
of widely available whole body PET molecular imaging of rheumatoid
arthritis without the need for a local cyclotron or automated radiosynthesis
equipment.
Experimental Section
Materials and Instrumentation
Chemicals
and reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Dorset, UK) unless
otherwise specified. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1200 LC system with in-line
UV and gamma detection (Flow-Count, LabLogic). NMR spectra were acquired
on either a Bruker Avance 400 or 700 spectrometer (Bruker UK Limited,
Coventry, UK). Spectra were referenced to residual solvent signals.
Mass spectra were recorded in the positive ion mode on an Agilent
6510 Q-TOF LC/MS mass spectrometer coupled to an Agilent 1200 LC system
(Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). Data were acquired and reference mass-corrected
via a dual-spray electrospray ionization source, using the factory-defined
calibration procedure. Analytical reverse-phase LCMS and radio-LCMS
traces were acquired using an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6
×
150 mm, 5 μm). Instant thin layer chromatography strips (ITLC-SG)
were obtained from Varian Medical Systems UK, Ltd. (Crawley, UK),
and ITLC strips were visualized using a Raytest Rita-Star TLC scanner.
Semipreparative reverse-phase HPLC was conducted using an Agilent
Eclipse XDB-C18 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 5 μm) coupled to
an Agilent 1200 LC system, with a 3 mL min–1 flow
rate and UV spectroscopic detection at 220 nm. Mobile phase A contained
water with 0.2% TFA and mobile phase B contained acetonitrile with
0.2% TFA. All methods started with 100% A at 0 min. For method 1,
the concentration of B increased at a rate of 2% min–1; for method 2, the concentration of B increased at a rate of 1%
min–1; and for method 3, the concentration of B
increased at a rate of 0.5% min–1. Analytical reverse-phase
HPLC and radio-HPLC traces were acquired using two different instruments:
(1) an Agilent 1200 LC system and an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18
column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) with a 0.25–1 mL min–1 flow rate and UV spectroscopic detection at either
214 or 220 nm. The radio-HPLC was coupled to a LabLogic Flow-Count
detector with a sodium iodide probe (B-FC-3200). Aliquots (10–200
μL) of each radiolabeled sample were injected onto the column.
Mobile phase A contained water with 0.1% TFA and mobile phase B contained
acetonitrile with 0.1% TFA. For method 4, flow rate was 1 mL min–1, the concentration of B increased at a rate of 5%
min–1, with 100% A at 0 min, and 100% B at 20 min.
For method 5, flow rate was 0.25 mL min–1, the concentration
of B increased at a rate of 2% min–1, with 100%
A at 0–5 min, and 100% B at 55 min. (2) An Agilent Zorbax Eclipse
XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) with a 1 mL min–1 flow rate and UV spectroscopic detection at either
214 or 220 nm coupled to a Shimadzu HPLC consisting of a SCL-10AVP
system controller, a SIL-10ADVP autoinjector, a LC-10 ATVP solvent
delivery unit, a FCV-10AL control valve, a DGU-14A degasser, and a
SPD-10AVP UV detector. This was coupled to a radiation detector consisting
of an Ortec model 276 Photomultiplier Base with Preamplifier, Amplifier,
BIAS supply, and SCA and a Bicron 1 M 11.2 Photomultiplier Tube. For
method 6, the concentration of B increased at a rate of 6.67% min–1, with 100% A at 0 min, and 80% B at 12 min. For initial
radiolabeling and characterization studies that utilized <400 MBq,
an Eckert and Ziegler 68Ge/68Ga generator (Berlin,
Germany) was used. For biodistribution studies, and experiments that
utilized >600 MBq 68Ga, an iThemba Laboratories 1.8
GBq 68Ge/68Ga generator (IDB Holland BV, Netherlands)
was used.Tricarboxylate 1,[17] hydroxypyridinone 2,[69] SCN-HP3, and HP3-RGD were synthesized as previously
described.[18] The cyclic peptide c(RGDfK)
was provided by Peptide Synthetics (Fareham, UK).
Compound 4
A solution of tricarboxylate 1 (18 mg, 40
μmol), hydroxypyridinone 2 (170 mg, 160 μmol),
HATU (60 mg, 158 μmol), and diisopropylethylamine (30 μL)
in DMF (2–5 mL) was heated in a microwave reactor (120 °C,
300 W, 30 min), after which the reaction solution was evaporated to
dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was applied to a silica
column, and eluted initially with methanol/chloroform (1:4), followed
by methanol/chloroform/40% ammonium hydroxide (10:40:1). Fractions
containing 3 (identified using mass spectrometry) were
dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to
dryness. Compound 3: ESI-MS: m/z for C195H228N26O36 + 3H+ calc 1170.90, found 1170.90 (monoisotopic
signal). Compound 3 (105 mg, 30 μmol) was added
to a solution of ethanol/aqueous 5.5% hydrazine (9:1) (5 mL), and
the mixture was heated in a microwave reactor (90–100 °C,
300 W, 30 min). The solution was cooled in an ice bath, and acidified
with concentrated hydrochloric acid to pH 1, filtered, and evaporated
to dryness. The residue was redissolved in water/acetonitrile (2:1)
and applied to a semipreparative HPLC column. Using HPLC method 1, 4 eluted with 44% B (22–25 min). Fractions containing
the desired product were lyophilized. Yield = 55 mg, 40% yield (based
on tricarboxylate 1). 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz): δ 1.84 (m, 6H), 1.91 (m, 18H), 2.05 (m, 6H),
2.14 (m, 18H), 2.30 (t, J = 7.2, 6H), 2.53 (s, 27H),
2.56 (broad, 2H), 3.10 (t, J = 6.1, 2H), 3.34 (broad,
6H), 3.78 (s, 27H), 4.56 (s, 18H), 5.17 (s, 18H), 6.95 (s, 9H), 7.34
(m, 27H), 7.43 (m, 18H). 13C NMR (CD3OD, 100
MHz): δ 21.2, 31.2, 30.9, 36.5, 37.3, 37.4, 38.9, 59.0, 75.7,
117.5, 129.70, 129.71, 130.1, 137.9, 146.0, 146.4, 152.9, 170.1, 171.5,
173.2, 175.4, 175.5, quaternary carbons of tripodal scaffold obscured
by CD3OD peaks. ESI-MS: m/z for C187H226N26O34 +
3H+ calc 1127.57, found 1127.57 (monoisotopic signal).
SCN-HP9
An excess of p-phenylene
diisothiocyanate (22 mg) and diisopropylethylamine (20 μL) in
DMF (0.3 mL) were added to a solution of 4 (15 mg, 4.4
μmol) in DMF (0.5–1 mL). The reaction solution was agitated,
and after 5–10 min, applied to a semipreparative HPLC column.
Using HPLC method 1, product 5 eluted with 48% B (24–25
min). Fractions containing compound 5 were lyophilized.
Compound 5: yield = 7 mg, 45%. 1H NMR (CD3OD, 400 MHz): δ 1.86 (m, 6H), 1.90 (m, 18H), 2.07 (m,
6H), 2.14 (m, 18H), 2.28 (t, J = 6.7, 6H), 2.46 (t, J = 6.1, 2H), 2.55 (s, 27H), 3.31 (presumed 6H, under CHD2OD signal), 3.76 (broad, 2H), 3.80 (s, 27H), 4.58 (s, 18H),
5.18 (s, 18H), 7.00 (s, 9H), 7.14 (d, J = 9.0, 2H)
7.33 (m, 27H), 7.42 (m, 18H), 7.45 (under peak at 7.42, 2H). ESI-MS: m/z for C195H230N28O34S2 + 4H+ calc 893.92,
found 893.92 (monoisotopic signal). A solution of chilled boron trichloride
in dichloromethane (5 mL, 1 M) was added to a sealed vial containing
compound 5 (7 mg, 2 μmol), and the reaction was
stirred at ambient temperature for 1 h. The reaction vial was then
cooled in an ice bath, and methanol (5–10 mL) was added dropwise
to the flask. The reaction solution was evaporated to near dryness
under reduced pressure, and acetone (50 mL) was added to the residue,
resulting in a flocculant white precipitate. This suspension was transferred
to a 50 mL centrifuge tube, and the mixture centrifuged at 3000 rpm
for 10 min. After this, the supernatant was decanted and discarded,
acetone added (50 mL), the suspension agitated, and centrifuged again
for 10 min. This process of washing with acetone was repeated again.
Finally, the product was dissolved in water/acetonitrile (50/50),
filtered, frozen, and lyophilized. The residue was applied to a semipreparative
HPLC column. Using HPLC method 2, SCN-HP9 eluted with 35%
B (35–36 min). Fractions containing the desired product were
lyophilized. Yield (trifluoroacetate salt) = 3 mg, 30–40%. 1H NMR (CD3OD, 700 MHz): δ 1.93 (t, J = 7.5, 6H), 1.96 (t, J = 7.5 18H), 2.15
(t, J = 7.5, 6H), 2.22 (t, J = 7.5,
18H), 2.33 (t, J = 6.3, 6H), 2.52 (broad, 2H), 2.57
(s, 27H), 3.35 (broad, 6H), 3.79 (broad, 2H), 3.92 (s, 27H), 4.70
(s, 18H), 6.93 (s, 9H), 7.20 (d, splitting = 8.7, 2H), 7.48 (d, splitting
= 8.7, 2H). 13C NMR (CD3OD, 175 MHz): δ
19.7, 29.3, 29.7, 34.9, 35.8, 36.1, 37.9, 57.5, 112.8, 123.9, 125.7,
127.0, 135.1, 137.8, 144.0, 148.9, 161.9, 172.0, 174.3, 174.9, 175.0,
180.6, quaternary carbons of tripodal scaffold obscured by CD3OD peaks. ESI-MS: m/z for
C132H176N28O34S2 + 4H+ calc 691.32, found 691.32 (monoisotopic signal).
RGD3
A solution of DMF (5 mL) containing tricarboxylate 1 (100 mg, 220 μmol), diisopropylcarbodiimide (10 equiv), N-hydroxysuccinimide (4 equiv), and diisopropylethylamine
(4 equiv) was stirred for 16 h, after which it was filtered, and the
filtrate applied to a semipreparative HPLC column. Using HPLC method
2, product 6 eluted with 38% B (38–42 min), and
fractions containing the desired compound were lyophilized. Compound 6: isolated yield = 50 mg, 30%. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): δ 2.22 (t, J = 7.4, 6H),
2.50 (t, J = 7.0, 2H), 2.77 (s, 12H), 2.59 (t, J = 7.4, 6H), 3.92 (t, J = 7.0, 2H), 7.67
(q, splitting = 3.0, 5.5, 2H), 7.79 (q, splitting = 3.0, 5.5, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): δ 25.5, 25.8, 28.6,
34.0, 34.6, 50.0, 123.3,132.2, 134.0, 168.3, 168.5, 169.6. ESI-MS: m/z for C33H33N5O15 + H+ calc 740.20, found 740.21.
Activated triester 6 (5 mg, 7 μmol) was added to
a solution of c(RGDfK) (20 mg, 24 μmol) and diisopropylethylamine
(5 μL) in dimethylformamide (0.1–0.5 mL), and the solution
was stirred for 10 min reaction at ambient temperature. After this
time, the solution was applied to a semipreparative HPLC column. Using
HPLC method 2, compound 7 eluted with 32% B (32 min).
Fractions containing the desired product were lyophilized. Compound 7: yield of trifluoroacetate salt = 7.5 mg, 42%. ESI-MS: m/z for C102H141N29O27 + 2H+ calc 1103.04, found 1103.04
(monoisotopic signal). Finally, phthalimide-protected compound 7 (15 mg) was added to a solution of ethanol/aqueous 5.5%
hydrazine (9:1) (5 mL), and the mixture was heated in a microwave
reactor (90–100 °C, 300 W, 30 min). The solution was then
cooled in an ice bath, and acidified with concentrated hydrochloric
acid to pH 1, filtered, and lyophilized. The solution was redissolved
in deionized water and applied to a semipreparative HPLC column. Using
HPLC method 2, RGD3 eluted with 28% B (28 min). Fractions
containing RGD3 were lyophilized. Yield: 6 mg, 40%. ESI-MS: m/z for C102H141N29O27 + 4H+ calc 519.52, found 519.52
(monoisotopic signal); HPLC: 220 nm, RT = 7.90 min, >97% purity
(HPLC method 4).
Synthesis of RGD Conjugates
RGD3 was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (100–300 μL)
and added to a solution of either SCN-HP3 or SCN-HP9 in dimethyl sulfoxide (100–300 μL), and diisopropylethylamine
(5–10 μL) was added. The reaction solutions were heated
in a microwave (120 °C, 300 W, 30 min) and then applied to a
reverse-phase HPLC column. Fractions containing the desired conjugate
in sufficient purity were combined and lyophilized. Using HPLC method
3, HP3-RGD3 eluted with 26% solvent B (52 min)
and HP9-RGD3 eluted with 25% solvent B (51 min).
Isolated yields = 30–40%. HP3-RGD3: ESI-MS: m/z for C139H195N39O35S2 + 5H+ calc 607.89,
found 607.89 (monoisotopic signal); HPLC: 220 nm, RT = 8.02 min, >99%
purity (HPLC method 4). HP9-RGD3: ESI-MS: m/z for C226H315N57O59S2 + 6H+ calc 806.89,
found 806.89 (monoisotopic signal); HPLC: 220 nm, RT = 7.77 min, >99%
purity (HPLC method 4).
Complexation with 68Ga3+ and Ga3+
Initial
radiolabeling experiments utilized an Eckert and Ziegler 68Ge/68Ga generator. Aqueous HCl solution (0.1 M, 5 mL)
was passed through the generator and the eluate was fractionated (5
× 1 mL). The second fraction (1 mL, containing 90–100
MBq 68Ga) was added directly to an ethanol/water solution
(50%/50%, 50–100 μL) of either HP3-RGD (25
μg, 12 nmol), HP3-RGD3 (50 μg, 13
nmol), or HP9-RGD3 (25 μg, 4 nmol), immediately
followed by a solution of ammonium acetate (1 M, 300 μL). This
solution was immediately applied to an analytical reverse-phase C18
HPLC column. [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]: radiochemical
yield >99% (HPLC), HPLC: RT = 8.38 min (HPLC method 4). [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]: radiochemical yield >99%
(HPLC), HPLC: RT = 8.37 min (HPLC method 4). [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]: radiochemical yield >99% (HPLC), HPLC:
RT = 8.32 min (HPLC method 4). For [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] and [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], specific
activity at point of synthesis = 8–9 MBq nmol–1 conjugate and for [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)], specific activity = 24–27 MBq nmol–1.The nonradioactive analogues, [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)], were also prepared. An
aqueous solution of Ga(NO3)3 (2 mg mL–1, 5 μL, 30–40 nmol, excess) was added to HP3-RGD (25 μg, 12 nmol), HP3-RGD3 (50 μg,
13 nmol), or HP9-RGD3 (25 μg, 4 nmol)
dissolved in an ethanol/water solution (50%/50%, 50–100 μL).
The solutions were applied to an analytical reverse-phase C18 HPLC
column and subjected to LCMS analysis. [Ga(HP3-RGD)]: HPLC RT = 8.93 min (HPLC method 4); MS C72H94N19O17S2Ga
+ 2H+, observed monoisotopic peak = 815.80, calculated
= 815.80 (monoisotopic signal); [Ga(HP3-RGD3)]: HPLC RT = 9.05 min (HPLC method 4); MS
C139H192N39O25S2Ga + 3H+, observed monoisotopic peak =1034.45, calculated
1034.45 (monoisotopic signal); [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)]: HPLC RT = 8.88 min (HPLC
method 4); MS C226H306N57O59S2Ga3 + 4H+, observed monoisotopic
peak = 1259.26, calculated 1259.25 (monoisotopic signal). For more
detailed LCMS analysis of HP9-RGD3, HP9-RGD3 was titrated with 0, 1, 2, and 3 mol equiv of Ga(NO3)3, prior to analysis using LCMS (HPLC method 5).For biodistribution with U87MG tumor bearing mice, 68Ga eluate from an iThemba Lab generator was preconditioned as previously
described.[50] Briefly, a cation exchange
cartridge containing AG 50Wx4 resin (50 mg) was conditioned by passing
through aqueous HCl solution (4 M, 1 mL) and deionized water (1 mL)
sequentially. To elute the 68Ge/68Ga generator,
aqueous HCl solution (0.4 M, 5 mL) was passed through the generator
and transferred directly onto the cation exchange cartridge. The cartridge
was dried with air (1 mL), washed with 0.15 M HCl in water/ethanol
(20%/80%), and again dried with air (1 mL). A solution of 0.9 M HCl
in water/ethanol (200 μL, 10%/90%) was used to elute 68Ga (800–1000 MBq), which was diluted to a volume of 1 mL with
deionized water. Lyophilized peptide conjugate (trifluoroacetate salt)—HP3-RGD (25 μg, 12 nmol), HP3-RGD3 (50 μg, 13 nmol), or HP9-RGD3 (25 μg,
4 nmol)—dissolved in 20–40 μL of water/ethanol
(50%/50%) was added to the solution containing 68Ga, immediately
followed by a solution of ammonium acetate (2 M, 400 μL) and
0.9% saline (1100 μL). An aliquot for ITLC analysis was immediately
applied to an ITLC-SG plate. The ITLC-SG plate was developed using
an aqueous citrate buffer (0.1 M, pH 5.5) mobile phase. [68Ga(HP3-RGD)], [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)], and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)]: Rf < 0.1; [68Ga(citrate)2]3–: Rf > 0.8. [68Ga(HP3-RGD)]: radiochemical yield > 95% (ITLC).
HPLC (method 6): RT = 9.78 min; [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)]: radiochemical yield > 95% (ITLC), HPLC: RT = 9.54 min;
[68Ga(HP9-RGD9)]: radiochemical yield
> 95% (ITLC), HPLC: RT = 9.50 min.
Log POCT/PBS Determination
A solution containing 68Ga-conjugate (50 μL, synthesized using eluate from an Eckert
and Ziegler generator as described above) was added to 550 μL
of octanol and 500 μL of aqueous phosphate buffered saline solution.
The mixture was agitated using a vortex, and the phases separated
by centrifugation (1000 rpm, 2 min). Aliquots from each phase were
counted for radioactivity in a gamma counter. The experiment was repeated
four times.
Determination of IC50
The relative affinity of [Ga(HP3-RGD)], [Ga(HP3-RGD3)], [Ga3(HP9-RGD3)], and c(RGDfK) for integrin αvβ3 was determined in a solid-phase competitive
binding assay18 with 125I-echistatin (PerkinElmer,
Boston). In brief, wells of a 96 well plate were coated with integrin
αvβ3 (150 ng mL–1) in coating buffer (100 μL, 25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM MnCl2) overnight at 4 °C. Wells were then washed twice in
binding buffer (coating buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin
(w/v) (BSA)) before being incubated for 2 h at room temperature with
blocking buffer (coating buffer containing 1% BSA (w/v)). After a
further two washes in binding buffer, 125I-echistatin (0.5
kBq) and either [Ga(HP3-RGD)],
[Ga(HP3-RGD3)],
[Ga3(HP9-RGD3)] or c(RGDfK) were added simultaneously (to a total volume
of 100 μL, and a conjugate/c(RGDfK) concentration of 10000 nM
to 0.001 nM) for 1 h at room temperature, before being washed twice
as before. Finally, the amount of activity bound to the wells via
integrin αvβ3 was counted using
a Wallac 1282 Compugamma Universal Gamma Counter. Measurements at
each concentration for each compound were obtained in sextuplicate.
IC50 values were calculated using a nonlinear regression
model (Binding/Saturation, one site–total) in GraphPad Prism
5.04.
PET Scanning and Biodistribution of U87MG Tumor Bearing Animals
All animal experiments with U87MG tumor bearing animals were performed
with approval from the Peter MacCallum animal experimentation ethics
committee. Six- to eight-week-old female Balb/c nude mice (Animal
Resources Centre, Western Australia) were implanted subcutaneously
on the right flank with 4 million U87MG cells. Once the tumors reached
a volume >250 mm3 (two to three weeks) the animals were
injected intravenously with 13–30 MBq of [68Ga(HP3-RGD)] (1 μg of conjugate), [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (2 μg of conjugate), and [68Ga(HP9-RGD3)] (1 μg of conjugate) (100
μL of solutions described above). At 1 and 2 h, the animals
were anaesthetized and imaged on a Philips MOSAIC small animal PET
scanner for 10 min each. For blocking studies, animals were coinjected
with c(RGDfK) peptide (400 μg), anaesthetized at 1 h, and imaged
for 10 min each. The images were reconstructed using a 3D RAMLA algorithm,
and radiotracer uptake was determined by ex vivo tissue counting as
described previously.[70] On completion of
the scan animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation and tissues
harvested, weighed, and radioactivity counted using a gamma counter
(Biomedex). Confidence intervals and p values were
calculated using a two-tailed t-test in GraphPad
Prism 5.04.
PET/CT Scanning and Biodistribution of Animals
with Induced Rheumatoid Arthritis
All animal experiments
on mice with induced rheumatoid arthritis complied with the Animals
(Scientific Procedures) Act (UK 1986) and Home Office (UK) guidelines.
A K/BxN serum transfer model of arthritis was utilized in these experiments,
and serum was produced as previously reported.[59,60] Wild type C57Bl/6 male 6–8-week-old mice (Charles River)
were injected with 150 μL arthritogenic serum (intraperitoneally)
on days 0 and 2. The arthritic serum was either diluted 2-fold with
PBS (to induce severe arthritis) or 8-fold with PBS (to induce mild
arthritis). PBS alone was also injected into a third group to assess
uptake in nonarthritic mice. Disease severity was evaluated in mice
on days 0, 2 and 8 post-injection, by measuring weight loss, thickness
of swollen paws, using microcalipers (Kroeplin), and visual clinical
scoring on a scale of 0–3 per paw added for a total score out
of 12 per animal. On day 8, animals from the control, the mild arthritis
and severe arthritis groups (n = 3) were injected
intravenously with [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–14 MBq, 4 μg HP3-RGD3).
A fourth group of animals (n = 3) with severe arthritis
were coadministered [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] (8–14 MBq, 4 μg HP3-RGD3) and
c(RGDfK) peptide (400 μg). [68Ga(HP3-RGD3)] was prepared using protocols described above for radiolabeling
with an Eckert and Ziegler 68Ge/68Ga generator.
Animals were injected under isoflurane anesthesia, after which they
were immediately allowed to recover. One hour post-injection, animals
were culled by CO2 asphyxiation and PET scanned using a
nanoScanPET/CT (Mediso Medical Imaging Systems, Budapest, Hungary)
and organs/tissues harvested, weighed, and radioactivity counted using
a gamma counter. PET/CT images were reconstructed using VivoQuant
(inviCRO, LLC, Boston, USA). Confidence intervals and p values were calculated using a two-tailed t-test
in GraphPad Prism 5.04.
Authors: David J Berry; Yongmin Ma; James R Ballinger; Richard Tavaré; Alexander Koers; Kavitha Sunassee; Tao Zhou; Saima Nawaz; Gregory E D Mullen; Robert C Hider; Philip J Blower Journal: Chem Commun (Camb) Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Michelle T Ma; Oliver C Neels; Delphine Denoyer; Peter Roselt; John A Karas; Denis B Scanlon; Jonathan M White; Rodney J Hicks; Paul S Donnelly Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Xiaoyuan Chen; Shuang Liu; Yingping Hou; Michel Tohme; Ryan Park; James R Bading; Peter S Conti Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Daphne Lobeek; Gerben M Franssen; Michelle T Ma; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Clemens Decristoforo; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman; Samantha Y A Terry; Mark Rijpkema Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Fatemeh Khodadust; Aiarpi Ezdoglian; Maarten M Steinz; Judy R van Beijnum; Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Gerrit Jansen; Sander W Tas; Conny J van der Laken Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Jennifer D Young; Vincenzo Abbate; Cinzia Imberti; Levente K Meszaros; Michelle T Ma; Samantha Y A Terry; Robert C Hider; Greg E Mullen; Philip J Blower Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: H T Dos Santos; K Nam; C T Brown; S M Dean; S Lewis; C S Pfeifer; P Lei; M J Petris; S T Andreadis; O J Baker Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Maria Iris Tsionou; Caroline E Knapp; Calum A Foley; Catherine R Munteanu; Andrew Cakebread; Cinzia Imberti; Thomas R Eykyn; Jennifer D Young; Brett M Paterson; Philip J Blower; Michelle T Ma Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.361
Authors: George P Keeling; Billie Sherin; Jana Kim; Belinda San Juan; Tilmann Grus; Thomas R Eykyn; Frank Rösch; Gareth E Smith; Philip J Blower; Samantha Y A Terry; Rafael T M de Rosales Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Saima Nawaz; Gregory E D Mullen; Kavitha Sunassee; Jayanta Bordoloi; Philip J Blower; James R Ballinger Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Andrea J North; John A Karas; Michelle T Ma; Philip J Blower; Uwe Ackermann; Jonathan M White; Paul S Donnelly Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Matthew Farleigh; Truc Thuy Pham; Zilin Yu; Jana Kim; Kavitha Sunassee; George Firth; Nafsika Forte; Vijay Chudasama; James R Baker; Nicholas J Long; Charlotte Rivas; Michelle T Ma Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 4.774