| Literature DB >> 27966655 |
Eliana Rulli1, Federica Guffanti2, Elisa Caiola2, Monica Ganzinelli3, Giovanna Damia2, Marina C Garassino3, Sheila Piva4, Lorenzo Ceppi5, Massimo Broggini2, Mirko Marabese2.
Abstract
The common polymorphic variant in the 5' untranslated region of the excision repair cross-complementation group 5 (ERCC5) gene was described to generate an upstream open reading frame that regulates both the basal ERCC5 expression and its ability to be synthesized following DNA damage. This variant was reported to affect response to platinum therapy in a cohort of patients with pediatric ependymoma. The role of this variant was investigated in two cohorts of cancer patients, specifically in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (N = 137) and in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) patients (N = 240), treated in first-line with platinum-based compounds. Differently from what reported for pediatric ependymoma, the analysis of the polymorphism in NSCLC patients cohort was not able to detect any difference among patients harboring different genotypes both in progression free survival (HR = 0.93; 95%CI 0.64-1.33; p-value = 0.678) and overall survival (HR = 0.90; 95%CI 0.62-1.33; p-value = 0.625). These data were corroborated in a EOC patients cohort, where similar progression free survival (HR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.67-1.24; p-value = 0.561) and overall survival (HR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.71-1.35; p-value = 0.912) were found for the different genotypes. These data, obtained in appropriately sized populations, indicate that the effect of this ERCC5 polymorphism is likely to be relevant only in specific tumors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27966655 PMCID: PMC5155271 DOI: 10.1038/srep39217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
NSCLC patients’ characteristics.
| Total | GG | AG/AA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||||
| Patients | 137 | 90 | 65.7 | 47 | 34.3 | ||
| Age | Median(IQR) | 64.3 (57.3–69.9) | 65.5 (58.5–71.2) | 0.268 | |||
| Gender | Male | 98 | 66 | 73.3 | 32 | 68.1 | 0.520 |
| Female | 39 | 24 | 26.7 | 15 | 31.9 | ||
| ECOG-PS | 0 | 77 | 53 | 58.9 | 24 | 51.1 | 0.300 |
| 1 | 54 | 34 | 37.8 | 20 | 42.5 | ||
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 3.3 | 3 | 6.4 | ||
| Smoking | Never/ex smokers | 92 | 61 | 67.8 | 31 | 66.0 | 0.830 |
| Smokers | 45 | 29 | 32.2 | 16 | 34.0 | ||
| Stage at diagnosis | IIIA, IIIB | 25 | 16 | 17.8 | 9 | 19.2 | 0.844 |
| IIIB wet, IV | 112 | 74 | 82.2 | 38 | 80.8 | ||
| Histotype | Adenocarcinoma | 96 | 63 | 70.0 | 33 | 70.2 | 0.868 |
| Squamous | 34 | 23 | 25.5 | 11 | 23.4 | ||
| Other | 7 | 4 | 4.5 | 3 | 6.4 | ||
| KRAS status | Wild-type | 106 | 68 | 75.5 | 38 | 80.8 | 0.500 |
| Mutated | 31 | 22 | 24.5 | 9 | 9.2 | ||
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier curves for OS (A) and PFS (B) according to rs751402 genotypes in NSCLC population.
Prognostic evaluation of clinical and histopathological characteristics in NSCLC population.
| Overall Survival | Progression Free Survival | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | Lower 95% HR | Upper 95% HR | HR | Lower 95% HR | Upper 95% HR | |||
| Unadjusted | ||||||||
| rs751402 (GG vs GA/AA) | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.61 | 0.625 | 1.08 | 0.75 | 1.56 | 0.678 |
| Age at diagnosis | 0.97 | 0.63 | 1.47 | 0.872 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 1.26 | 0.413 |
| ECOG-PS (2 vs 1 vs 0) | 1.56 | 1.15 | 2.13 | 0.004 | 1.36 | 1.03 | 1.80 | 0.030 |
| Histotype (squamous vs others) | 0.67 | 0.43 | 1.05 | 0.077 | 0.60 | 0.39 | 0.92 | 0.019 |
| Tumor stage (IIIB wet, IV vs IIIA, IIIB) | 1.79 | 1.09 | 2.03 | 0.021 | 1.83 | 1.13 | 2.97 | 0.015 |
| Smoking (smoking and former vs not smoking) | 1.13 | 0.76 | 1.68 | 0.545 | 1.05 | 0.72 | 1.53 | 0.812 |
| Sex (F vs M) | 0.83 | 0.55 | 1.24 | 0.355 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 1.52 | 0.857 |
| | 2.27 | 1.47 | 3.50 | <0.001 | 1.66 | 1.10 | 2.51 | 0.016 |
| Adjusted | ||||||||
| rs751402 (GG vs GA/AA) | 1.03 | 0.70 | 1.52 | 0.892 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 1.45 | 0.989 |
*Adjusted for ECOG-PS, histology and KRAS status.
EOC patients’ characteristics.
| Total | GG | AG/AA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | ||||||
| Patients | 229 | 152 | 66.4 | 77 | 33.6 | ||
| Age | Median(IQR) | 54.3 (46.5–64.9) | 55.4 (46.8–65.8) | 51.7 (45.2–61.0) | 0.084 | ||
| Grade | Borderline, 1 | 20 | 13 | 8.5 | 7 | 9.1 | 0.892 |
| 2, 3 | 209 | 139 | 91.5 | 70 | 90.9 | ||
| Histotype | Serous | 177 | 118 | 77.6 | 59 | 76.6 | 0.623 |
| Endometrioid | 22 | 16 | 10.5 | 6 | 7.8 | ||
| Other | 30 | 18 | 11.9 | 12 | 15.6 | ||
| Residual tumor | NED, micro | 39 | 27 | 17.8 | 12 | 15.6 | 0.878 |
| <1 cm | 29 | 21 | 13.8 | 8 | 10.4 | ||
| 1–2 cm | 14 | 7 | 4.6 | 7 | 9.1 | ||
| 2–5 cm | 35 | 20 | 13.2 | 15 | 19.5 | ||
| 5–10 cm | 50 | 36 | 23.7 | 14 | 18.2 | ||
| >10 cm | 62 | 41 | 27.0 | 21 | 27.3 | ||
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves for OS (A) and PFS (B) according to rs751402 genotypes in EOC population.
Prognostic evaluation of clinical and histopathological characteristics in EOC population.
| Overall Survival | Progression Free Survival | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | Lower 95% HR | Upper 95% HR | HR | Lower 95% HR | Upper 95% HR | |||
| Unadjusted | ||||||||
| rs751402 (GG vs GA/AA) | 0.97 | 0.71 | 1.34 | 0.868 | 0.90 | 0.66 | 1.23 | 0.525 |
| Age at diagnosis | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.04 | <0.001 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.04 | <0.001 |
| Residual tumor (>2 cm vs <2 cm) | 2.41 | 1.72 | 3.38 | <0.001 | 2.18 | 1.57 | 3.02 | <0.001 |
| Grade (2, 3 vs borderline, 1) | 3.69 | 1.73 | 7.87 | 0.001 | 3.03 | 1.55 | 5.92 | 0.001 |
| Histotype Serous ref. | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Endometrioid | 1.03 | 0.60 | 1.76 | 0.911 | 1.02 | 0.62 | 1.69 | 0.940 |
| Other | 1.33 | 0.86 | 2.05 | 0.203 | 1.21 | 0.79 | 1.86 | 0.373 |
| Adjusted | ||||||||
| rs751402 (GG vs GA/AA) | 0.88 | 0.63 | 1.22 | 0.429 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 1.14 | 0.252 |
*Adjusted for age, tumor grade and residual tumor.