Literature DB >> 27966377

Acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective claims analysis of resource utilization and expenditures for newly diagnosed patients from first-line induction to remission and relapse.

William Irish1, Michael Ryan1, Larry Gache1, Candace Gunnarsson1, Timothy Bell2, Mark Shapiro2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate resource utilization and expenditures for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a real-world claims database. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: AML patients were identified in MarketScan claims databases between 1 January 2009 and 31 January 2015. Patients had a minimum of two AML diagnosis codes, hospitalization within 14 days after initial diagnosis, and ≥6 months of enrollment before initial diagnosis. Patients were monitored from first-line induction to a record of remission. A subset had a record of a second treatment period, defined as time from relapse to remission. Patient demographics, AML risk factors, and comorbidities were recorded. Descriptive analysis of utilization and expenditures (in 2014 $US) were reported for each cohort.
RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met in 1597 patients (mean age, 58.4 years; 51.0% male). Ninety percent of patients had ≥1 risk factor for AML. Mean (SD) healthcare expenditures for patients from first-line induction to remission (n = 681) were $208,857 ($152,090). Of the 157 who had a record of relapse, 70 had a record of a second remission. Expenditures for these patients (n = 70) from relapse to remission were $142,569 ($208,307); 60% were admitted to a hospital for a mean of 18.5 hospital days, and 20% had ≥1 emergency room visit.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this claims-based analysis is limited by a lack of generalizability to noninsured populations and potential underreporting of certain events and diagnoses, we found that treating AML patients poses a significant healthcare burden, during both first-line induction and relapse. With people living longer, the number of cases of AML is expected to increase in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia; Expenditures; Induction; Relapse; Remission; Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27966377     DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1267615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  11 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of liposomal cytarabine/daunorubicin in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Kishan K Patel; George Goshua; Rory M Shallis; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Scott F Huntington; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Socioeconomic cost of AML in Sweden-A population-based study using multiple nation-wide registers.

Authors:  Emma Hernlund; Josefine Redig; Björn Paulsson; Åsa Rangert Derolf; Martin Höglund; Simona Vertuani; Gunnar Juliusson
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Economic and Clinical Burden of Relapsed and/or Refractory Active Treatment Episodes in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in the USA: A Retrospective Analysis of a Commercial Payer Database.

Authors:  Bhavik J Pandya; Chi-Chang Chen; Bruno C Medeiros; Catherine B McGuiness; Samuel Wilson; L Elise Horvath Walsh; Rolin L Wade
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization in patients with FLT3-mutated and wild-type acute myeloid leukemia: A medical chart study.

Authors:  James D Griffin; Hongbo Yang; Yan Song; David Kinrich; Manasee V Shah; Cat N Bui
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Comparison of Hospital Length of Stay and Supportive Care Utilization Between Patients Treated with CPX-351 and 7+3 for Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.

Authors:  Kwanza Price; Zhun Cao; Craig Lipkin; Deb Profant; Scott Robinson
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-01-08

6.  Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients between 60-75 Years with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Intensive Chemotherapy Induction: A Spanish Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Antonio Solana-Altabella; Juan Eduardo Megías-Vericat; Octavio Ballesta-López; Blanca Boluda; Isabel Cano; Evelyn Acuña-Cruz; Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga; Laura Torres-Miñana; Claudia Sargas; Miguel Á Sanz; Carmela Borrell-García; Eduardo López-Briz; José Luis Poveda-Andrés; Javier De la Rubia; Pau Montesinos; David Martínez-Cuadrón
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Budget Impact Analysis of Using Daunorubicin-Cytarabine Liposome in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Therapy-Related AML or AML and Myelodysplasia-Related Changes.

Authors:  Ivar S Jensen; Elizabeth Wu; Naomi C Sacks; Philip L Cyr; Karen C Chung
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2018-10

8.  The epidemiology, treatment patterns, healthcare utilizations and costs of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) in Taiwan.

Authors:  Huai-Hsuan Huang; Chieh-Min Chen; Chen-Yu Wang; William Wei-Yuan Hsu; Ho-Min Chen; Bor-Sheng Ko; Fei-Yuan Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral azacitidine maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Kishan K Patel; Scott F Huntington; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-11-23

10.  Drug responsiveness of leukemic cells detected in vitro at diagnosis correlates with therapy response and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maria A Kolesnikova; Aleksandra V Sen'kova; Tatiana I Pospelova; Marina A Zenkova
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.