Fahad I Alkhudhairy1, Zeeshan H Ahmad2. 1. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Saud University, College of Dentistry, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 2. Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, e-mail: zeeshan-a-h@yahoo.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Various bulk-fill materials depending on their composition, viscosity, and flow ability have different physical and mechanical properties. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength and microleakage properties of activa restorative with other bulk-fill restorative materials surefil (SDR), Biodentine, ever X posterior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty permanent premolars were selected for shear bond strength, and 20 permanent premolars were selected with class II cavities on mesial and distal side for microleakage. Universal testing device was used to assess the shear bond strength. Microleakage was checked using dye penetration method under a stereomicroscope. Mean and standard deviation values were calculated from the recorded values. Intergroup comparison was done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength was highest for SDR surefil followed by Ever X posterior, Bioactive restorative, and Biodentine respectively. In this study, SDR (surefil) showed better shear bond strength and better microleakage properties compared with the other test materials (F = 186.7157, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed that flowable and fiber-reinforced composites have better shear bond strength and microleakage properties. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Flowable bulk-fill composite resins can be used as dentin substitutes because of its superior properties.
INTRODUCTION: Various bulk-fill materials depending on their composition, viscosity, and flow ability have different physical and mechanical properties. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine and compare the shear bond strength and microleakage properties of activa restorative with other bulk-fill restorative materials surefil (SDR), Biodentine, ever X posterior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty permanent premolars were selected for shear bond strength, and 20 permanent premolars were selected with class II cavities on mesial and distal side for microleakage. Universal testing device was used to assess the shear bond strength. Microleakage was checked using dye penetration method under a stereomicroscope. Mean and standard deviation values were calculated from the recorded values. Intergroup comparison was done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test. RESULTS: The mean shear bond strength was highest for SDR surefil followed by Ever X posterior, Bioactive restorative, and Biodentine respectively. In this study, SDR (surefil) showed better shear bond strength and better microleakage properties compared with the other test materials (F = 186.7157, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed that flowable and fiber-reinforced composites have better shear bond strength and microleakage properties. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Flowable bulk-fill composite resins can be used as dentin substitutes because of its superior properties.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bulk-fill; Dentin substitute; Microleakage Shear bond strength.