Literature DB >> 27965430

Timing of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Observational Study From the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Benjamin P George1, Adam G Kelly1, George P Albert1, David Y Hwang1, Robert G Holloway2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke guidelines recommend time-limited trials of nasogastric feeding prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. We sought to describe timing of PEG placement and identify factors associated with early PEG for acute ischemic stroke.
METHODS: We designed a retrospective observational study to examine time to PEG for ischemic stroke admissions in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2001 to 2011. We defined early PEG placement as 1 to 7 days from admission. Using multivariable regression analysis, we identified the effects of patient and hospital characteristics on PEG timing.
RESULTS: We identified 34 623 admissions receiving a PEG from 2001 to 2011, 53% of which received the PEG 1 to 7 days from admission. Among hospitals placing ≥10 PEG tubes, median time to PEG for individual hospitals ranged from 3 days to over 3 weeks (interquartile range 6-8.5 days). Older adult age groups were associated with early PEG (≥85 years versus 18-54 years: adjusted odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.50-1.87). Those receiving a PEG and tracheostomy were more likely to receive the PEG beyond 7 days, and these patients were more often younger compared with PEG only recipients. Those admitted to high-volume hospitals were more likely to receive their PEG early (≥350 versus <150 hospitalizations; adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.35).
CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the PEG recipients received their surgical feeding tube within 7 days of admission. The oldest old, who may benefit most from time-limited trials of nasogastric feeding for ≥2 to 3 weeks, were most likely to receive a PEG within 7 days.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PEG; feeding tube; gastrostomy tube; ischemic stroke; variation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27965430     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement.

Authors:  Theresa A Fessler; Timothy B Short; Kate F Willcutts; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Outcomes among patients with direct enteral vs nasogastric tube placement after acute stroke.

Authors:  Raed A Joundi; Gustavo Saposnik; Rosemary Martino; Jiming Fang; Joan Porter; Moira K Kapral
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Race Differences in Gastrostomy Tube Placement After Stroke in Majority-White, Minority-Serving, and Racially Integrated US Hospitals.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Lisa A Cooper; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Minority race and male sex as risk factors for non-beneficial gastrostomy tube placements after stroke.

Authors:  Roland Faigle; Joseph A Carrese; Lisa A Cooper; Victor C Urrutia; Rebecca F Gottesman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Timing of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in post-stroke patients does not impact mortality, complications, or outcomes.

Authors:  Kavya M Reddy; Preston Lee; Parul J Gor; Antonio Cheesman; Noor Al-Hammadi; David John Westrich; Jason Taylor
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-05-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.