Literature DB >> 27965228

Safety of Continuous Peripheral Infusion of 3% Sodium Chloride Solution in Neurocritical Care Patients.

G Morgan Jones1, Lauren Bode2, Heidi Riha2, Michael J Erdman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous drug information resources recommend that continuous intravenous 3% sodium chloride solution be administered via a central catheter.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of infusion-related reactions and electrolyte abnormalities in neurocritical care patients treated with continuous intravenous infusion of 3% sodium chloride solution via a peripheral catheter.
METHODS: Data on patients treated with continuous intravenous infusion of 3% sodium chloride solution at 2 academic medical centers were evaluated retrospectively to determine the administration site. Electronic notes on catheter status were reviewed to determine the occurrence of infusion-related reactions. Prespecified thresholds were used to assess electrolyte abnormalities.
RESULTS: Of 213 patients who had peripheral continuous intravenous infusions of 3% sodium chloride solution, 15 (7%) had infusion-related reactions. Administration was changed to a central catheter in 56 patients (26.3%), but only 5 changes were due to an infusion-related reaction. Most (157 patients, 73.7%) received their entire treatment peripherally, for a median duration of 44 hours, 3 minutes. The most common electrolyte abnormalities were hyperchloremia in 49.3% and hypokalemia in 46.9% of patients.
CONCLUSION: Current recommendations that a central catheter is required for continuous intravenous infusion of 3% sodium chloride solution should be reevaluated. Only a few patients who had peripheral infusions had infusion-related reactions. Electrolyte abnormalities occurred frequently with peripheral infusion, but the clinical importance of the abnormalities remains unclear. ©2016 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27965228     DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2017439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intraosseous Administration of Hypertonic Saline in Acute Brain-Injured Patients: A Prospective Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Thomas Lawson; Omar Hussein; Muhammad Nasir; Archana Hinduja; Michel T Torbey
Journal:  Neurologist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.398

2.  Saving Brain and Vein: Administering Hypertonic Saline Through a Peripheral IV Catheter.

Authors:  Jeremy R Herrmann; Alicia K Au
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.971

3.  Lidocaine coinfusion alleviates vascular pain induced by hypertonic saline infusion: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Zhiping Song; Shibiao Chen; Yang Zhang; Xiaoyun Shi; Na Zhao; Zhengyu Liao
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  High Chloride Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Large Hemispheric Infarction.

Authors:  Dong-Seok Gwak; Inyoung Chung; Baik-Kyun Kim; Sukyoon Lee; Han-Gil Jeong; Yong Soo Kim; Heeyun Chae; Chan-Young Park; Moon-Ku Han
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Hyperchloremia Is Associated With Poorer Outcome in Critically Ill Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Kaibin Huang; Yanhong Hu; Yongming Wu; Zhong Ji; Shengnan Wang; Zhenzhou Lin; Suyue Pan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.