Literature DB >> 27960581

Distribution of Ocular Component Measures and Refraction in Brazilian School Children.

Rodrigo Pessoa Cavalcanti Lira1,2, Carlos Eduardo Leite Arieta1, Thaís Helena Moreira Passos1, Diana Maziero1, Gustavo Lima do Valle Astur1, Ítalo Fernandes do Espírito Santo1, Ana Cláudia Bertolani1, Luis Fernando Pozzi1, Rosane Silvestre de Castro1, Álvaro Antônio Bandeira Ferraz2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe ocular component values and refraction in 6-17-year-old school children in Campinas, Brazil.
METHODS: To obtain a representative sample, a total of 1100 6-17-year-old public school students in Campinas, Brazil, were randomly selected and divided into groups according to median ages 6 years (range 5-7 years), 10 years (range 9-11 years), 14 years (range 13-15 years), and 17 years (range 16-18 years). Cycloplegic autorefraction and ocular biometry were performed on each child.
RESULTS: Parental consent for participation was obtained for 778 of the 1100 students (70.7%). Of these, 440 (56.6%) were female and 330 (44.4%) male. Sex distributions were similar for each median age group. Median age groups 6, 10, 14, and 17 years displayed significant trends of decreasing mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER; 0.96, 0.89, 0.57, and 0.23 diopters, D, respectively), mean lens thickness (3.50, 3.42, 3.41, and 3.45 mm, respectively), and mean lens power (23.6, 22.7, 21.8, and 21.2D, respectively), but significant trends of increasing mean anterior chamber depth (ACD; 3.00, 3.12, 3.16, and 3.15 mm, respectively), mean vitreous chamber depth (VCD; 16.0, 16.4, 16.6, and 16.8 mm, respectively), and mean axial length (22.5, 23.0, 23.2, 23.4 mm, respectively; all p for trend <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant trends towards lower refractive power, increased prevalence of myopia, increased ACD, VCD, and axial length, and decreased lens power were associated with increasing age in these children. There were no significant changes in corneal thickness or corneal curvature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emmetropization; hyperopia; myopia; ocular components; refractive error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27960581     DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1254249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  6 in total

1.  Simultaneous Changes in Astigmatism with Noncycloplegia Refraction and Ocular Biometry in Chinese Primary Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Yaoyao Lin; Dandan Jiang; Chunchun Li; Xiao Chang; Balamurali Vasudevan; Xiaoqiong Huang; Wenzhe Zhou; Lei Qin; Yanyan Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  The Prevalence of Myopia and Factors Associated with It Among Secondary School Children in Rural Vietnam.

Authors:  Ho Duc Hung; Duong Dinh Chinh; Pham Van Tan; Nguyen Viet Duong; Nguyen Quoc Anh; Nguyen Huu Le; Ho Xuan Tuan; Nguyen Tuan Anh; Nguyen Thi Thuy Duong; Vu Duy Kien
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-22

Review 3.  A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Piotr Kanclerz; Kazuo Tsubota; Carla Lanca; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  The Prevalence of Myopia in Children in Spain: An Updated Study in 2020.

Authors:  Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina; Clara Martinez-Perez; Cesar Villa-Collar; Mariano González-Pérez; Ana González-Abad; Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Tena
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Progression of Vision in Chinese School-Aged Children Before and After COVID-19.

Authors:  Wenjing Wang; Shuzhen Peng; Faxue Zhang; Boya Zhu; Longjiang Zhang; Xiaodong Tan
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  Prevalence of myopia among urban and suburban school children in Tamil Nadu, South India: findings from the Sankara Nethralaya Tamil Nadu Essilor Myopia (STEM) Study.

Authors:  Aparna Gopalakrishnan; Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen; Viswanathan Sivaraman; Meenakshi Swaminathan; Yee Ling Wong; James A Armitage; Alex Gentle; Simon Backhouse
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.992

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.