Literature DB >> 27960541

High-Frequency Dusting Versus Conventional Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Intrarenal and Ureteral Calculi.

Roger Li1, David Ruckle1, Mohamed Keheila1, Jonathan Maldonado1, Michelle Lightfoot1, Muhannad Alsyouf1, Alexander Yeo1, Samuel R Abourbih1, Gaudencio Olgin1, Javier L Arenas1, D Duane Baldwin1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The efficiency of holmium laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis depends upon several factors, including laser pulse energy and frequency and stone composition and retropulsion. This study investigates the complex interplay between these factors and quantifies lithotripsy efficiency using different laser settings in a benchtop kidney and ureter model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro caliceal and ex vivo porcine ureteral models were constructed. Calcium oxalate monohydrate stones were fragmented using a 200-μm laser fiber. In the caliceal model, stone fragmentation and vaporization rates at settings of 0.6 J/5 Hz, 0.2 J/15 Hz, and 0.2 J/50 Hz were compared. In the ureteral model, fragmentation time, retropulsion rate, fragmentation rate, and fragmented stone weight were compared at settings of 0.6 J/5 Hz and 0.2 J/15 Hz. Retropulsive forces generated at 0.6 J/5 Hz, 0.2 J/15 Hz, and 0.2 J/50 Hz settings were compared. Analysis was performed using Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: In the caliceal model, the 0.6 J/5 Hz setting fragmented and vaporized stones at a higher rate than the 0.2 J/15 Hz setting (0.072 vs. 0.049 mg/s; p < 0.001). However, when the 0.2 J energy setting was combined with the 50 Hz frequency, the fragmentation rate (0.069 mg/s) was similar to the fragmentation rate at 0.6 J/5 Hz (0.072 mg/s; p = 0.677). In the ureteral model, the 0.6 J/5 Hz setting produced higher fragmentation rates (0.089 vs. 0.049 mg/s; p < 0.001), but resulted in significantly lower fragmented stone weight overall (16.815 vs. 25.485 mg; p = 0.009) due to higher retropulsion rates (0.732 vs. 0.213 mm/s; p < 0.001). Retropulsive forces decreased significantly when pulse energy decreased from 0.6 to 0.2 J (0.907 vs. 0.223 N; p < 0.001). Frequency did not affect retropulsive force at 15 and 50 Hz settings (0.223 vs. 0.288 N; p = 0.509).
CONCLUSIONS: Laser lithotripsy of calcium oxalate monohydrate stones in the ureter should be performed using the low-energy, moderate-frequency dusting setting to minimize retropulsion and maximize efficiency. In the renal calix, the low-energy high-frequency setting performed similarly to the high-energy low-frequency setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laser; metabolic stone; ureteral stones; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27960541     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  10 in total

1.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Use of 1070 nm fiber lasers in oral surgery: preliminary ex vivo study with FBG temperature monitoring.

Authors:  Carlo Fornaini; Elisabetta Merigo; Federica Poli; Chiara Cavatorta; Jean-Paul Rocca; Stefano Selleri; Annamaria Cucinotta
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2017-12-31

4.  What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Which is the best way to treat a stone on a flexible ureterorrenoscopy? | Opinion: Dusting.

Authors:  Antonio Correa Lopes
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust?

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-29

7.  Roundup.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  The Effects of Scanning Speed and Standoff Distance of the Fiber on Dusting Efficiency during Short Pulse Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Junqin Chen; Daiwei Li; Wenjun Yu; Zhiteng Ma; Chenhang Li; Gaoming Xiang; Yuan Wu; Junjie Yao; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Disilicate Dental Ceramic Surface Preparation by 1070 nm Fiber Laser: Thermal and Ultrastructural Analysis.

Authors:  Carlo Fornaini; Federica Poli; Elisabetta Merigo; Nathalie Brulat-Bouchard; Ahmed El Gamal; Jean-Paul Rocca; Stefano Selleri; Annamaria Cucinotta
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-31

10.  Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.

Authors:  Ralf Petzold; Arkadiusz Miernik; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.