Literature DB >> 27960108

A technique for evaluating bone ingrowth into 3D printed, porous Ti6Al4V implants accurately using X-ray micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry.

Anders Palmquist1, Furqan A Shah2, Lena Emanuelsson2, Omar Omar2, Felicia Suska2.   

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) to accurately evaluate bone formation within 3D printed, porous Ti6Al4V implants manufactured using Electron Beam Melting (EBM), retrieved after six months of healing in sheep femur and tibia. All samples were scanned twice (i.e., before and after resin embedding), using fast, low-resolution scans (Skyscan 1172; Bruker micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium), and were analysed by 2D and 3D morphometry. The main questions posed were: (i) Can low resolution, fast scans provide morphometric data of bone formed inside (and around) metal implants with a complex, open-pore architecture?, (ii) Can micro-CT be used to accurately quantify both the bone area (BA) and bone-implant contact (BIC)?, (iii) What degree of error is introduced in the quantitative data by varying the threshold values?, and (iv) Does resin embedding influence the accuracy of the analysis? To validate the accuracy of micro-CT measurements, each data set was correlated with a corresponding centrally cut histological section. The results show that quantitative histomorphometry corresponds strongly with 3D measurements made by micro-CT, where a high correlation exists between the two techniques for bone area/volume measurements around and inside the porous network. On the contrary, the direct bone-implant contact is challenging to estimate accurately or reproducibly. Large errors may be introduced in micro-CT measurements when segmentation is performed without calibrating the data set against a corresponding histological section. Generally, the bone area measurement is strongly influenced by the lower threshold limit, while the upper threshold limit has little or no effect. Resin embedding does not compromise the accuracy of micro-CT measurements, although there is a change in the contrast distributions and optimisation of the threshold ranges is required.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; Histomorphometry; In vivo; Osseointegration; Ti6Al4V; X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27960108     DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2016.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Micron        ISSN: 0968-4328            Impact factor:   2.251


  13 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Tumor-Induced Pelvic Defects With Customized, Three-Dimensional Printed Prostheses.

Authors:  Shenglin Xu; Zehao Guo; Qiling Shen; Yongjun Peng; Jian Li; Sheng Li; Peng He; Zheng Jiang; Yukang Que; Kun Cao; Bo Hu; Yong Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Bio-Functional Design, Application and Trends in Metallic Biomaterials.

Authors:  Ke Yang; Changchun Zhou; Hongsong Fan; Yujiang Fan; Qing Jiang; Ping Song; Hongyuan Fan; Yu Chen; Xingdong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  A multiscale analytical approach to evaluate osseointegration.

Authors:  Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  In vivo XCT bone characterization of lattice structured implants fabricated by additive manufacturing.

Authors:  A-F Obaton; J Fain; M Djemaï; D Meinel; F Léonard; E Mahé; B Lécuelle; J-J Fouchet; G Bruno
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-09-18

5.  An In Vivo Study in Rat Femurs of Bioactive Silicate Coatings on Titanium Dental Implants.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Lisa Biasetto; Hamada Elsayed; Elia Sbettega; Chiara Gardin; Anna Scanu; Simone Carmignato; Barbara Zavan; Stefano Sivolella
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Multimodal Analysis of the Tissue Response to a Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Presentation of a Two-Year Case Report of a Patient With Recurrent Pain, Inflammation, and Infection, Including a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Martin L Johansson; Tim G A Calon; Omar Omar; Furqan A Shah; Margarita Trobos; Peter Thomsen; Robert J Stokroos; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 7.  The Role of Epigenetic Functionalization of Implants and Biomaterials in Osseointegration and Bone Regeneration-A Review.

Authors:  Farah Asa'ad; Goda Pelanyte; Jincy Philip; Christer Dahlin; Lena Larsson
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Quality control methods in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: from imaging to biosensors.

Authors:  Daniele Zuncheddu; Elena Della Bella; Andrea Schwab; Dalila Petta; Gaia Rocchitta; Silvia Generelli; Felix Kurth; Annapaola Parrilli; Sophie Verrier; Julietta V Rau; Marco Fosca; Margherita Maioli; Pier Andrea Serra; Mauro Alini; Heinz Redl; Sibylle Grad; Valentina Basoli
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 13.567

9.  Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dall'Ava; Harry Hothi; Johann Henckel; Anna Di Laura; Paul Shearing; Alister Hart
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds for long bone repair in animal models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yifei Gu; Yi Sun; Sohaib Shujaat; Annabel Braem; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.