Literature DB >> 27960048

Artificial neural networks predict the incidence of portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Y Fei1, J Hu2, W-Q Li1, W Wang3, G-Q Zong3.   

Abstract

Essentials Predicting the occurrence of portosplenomesenteric vein thrombosis (PSMVT) is difficult. We studied 72 patients with acute pancreatitis. Artificial neural networks modeling was more accurate than logistic regression in predicting PSMVT. Additional predictive factors may be incorporated into artificial neural networks.
SUMMARY: Objective To construct and validate artificial neural networks (ANNs) for predicting the occurrence of portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis (PSMVT) and compare the predictive ability of the ANNs with that of logistic regression. Methods The ANNs and logistic regression modeling were constructed using simple clinical and laboratory data of 72 acute pancreatitis (AP) patients. The ANNs and logistic modeling were first trained on 48 randomly chosen patients and validated on the remaining 24 patients. The accuracy and the performance characteristics were compared between these two approaches by SPSS17.0 software. Results The training set and validation set did not differ on any of the 11 variables. After training, the back propagation network training error converged to 1 × 10-20 , and it retained excellent pattern recognition ability. When the ANNs model was applied to the validation set, it revealed a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 85.7%, a positive predictive value of 77.6% and negative predictive value of 90.7%. The accuracy was 83.3%. Differences could be found between ANNs modeling and logistic regression modeling in these parameters (10.0% [95% CI, -14.3 to 34.3%], 14.3% [95% CI, -8.6 to 37.2%], 15.7% [95% CI, -9.9 to 41.3%], 11.8% [95% CI, -8.2 to 31.8%], 22.6% [95% CI, -1.9 to 47.1%], respectively). When ANNs modeling was used to identify PSMVT, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.849 (95% CI, 0.807-0.901), which demonstrated better overall properties than logistic regression modeling (AUC = 0.716) (95% CI, 0.679-0.761). Conclusions ANNs modeling was a more accurate tool than logistic regression in predicting the occurrence of PSMVT following AP. More clinical factors or biomarkers may be incorporated into ANNs modeling to improve its predictive ability.
© 2016 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forecasting; logistic regression; neural network models; pancreatitis; portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27960048     DOI: 10.1111/jth.13588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  8 in total

1.  A noninvasive artificial neural network model to predict IgA nephropathy risk in Chinese population.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Shaojie Fu; Xueyao Wang; Juan Liu; Zhonggao Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Artificial intelligence: Emerging player in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive disease.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Chen; Peng Ge; Jia-Yue Liu; Jia-Lin Qu; Fang Bao; Cai-Ming Xu; Hai-Long Chen; Dong Shang; Gui-Xin Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 5.374

3.  Predicting Total Knee Replacement from Symptomology and Radiographic Structural Change Using Artificial Neural Networks-Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  Stephan Heisinger; Wolfgang Hitzl; Gerhard M Hobusch; Reinhard Windhager; Sebastian Cotofana
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury after Liver Transplantation: Machine Learning Approaches vs. Logistic Regression Model.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Soo Bin Yoon; Seong-Mi Yang; Won Ho Kim; Ho-Geol Ryu; Chul-Woo Jung; Kyung-Suk Suh; Kook Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence for the management of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Myrte Gorris; Sanne A Hoogenboom; Michael B Wallace; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.559

6.  Comparison of Diagnosis Accuracy between a Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network Model and Linear Regression in Digestive Disease Patients: an Empirical Research.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Xu Yang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Derivation and Validation of Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Hyung-Chul Lee; Hyun-Kyu Yoon; Karam Nam; Youn Joung Cho; Tae Kyong Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality in 7472 Very Low Birth Weight Infants Using Data from a Nationwide Neonatal Network.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Do; Kyoung Min Moon; Hyun-Seung Jin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.