Literature DB >> 27958571

Comparison of attosecond streaking and RABBITT.

L Cattaneo, J Vos, M Lucchini, L Gallmann, C Cirelli, U Keller.   

Abstract

Recent progress in the generation of ultra-short laser pulses has enabled the measurement of photoionization time delays with attosecond precision. For single photoemission time delays the most common techniques are based on attosecond streaking and the reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions (RABBITT). These are pump-probe techniques employing an extreme-ultraviolet (XUV) single attosecond pump pulse for streaking or an attosecond pump pulse train for RABBITT, and a phase-locked infrared (IR) probe pulse. These techniques can only extract relative timing information between electrons originating from different initial states within the same atom or different atoms. Here we address the question whether the two techniques give identical timing information. We present a complete study, supported by both experiments and simulations, comparing these two techniques for the measurement of the photoemission time delay difference between valence electrons emitted from the Ne 2p and Ar 3p ground states. We highlight not only the differences and similarities between the two techniques, but also critically investigate the reliability of the methods used to extract the timing information.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27958571     DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.029060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

Review 1.  Photoemission and photoionization time delays and rates.

Authors:  L Gallmann; I Jordan; H J Wörner; L Castiglioni; M Hengsberger; J Osterwalder; C A Arrell; M Chergui; E Liberatore; U Rothlisberger; U Keller
Journal:  Struct Dyn       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.920

2.  Anisotropic photoemission time delays close to a Fano resonance.

Authors:  Claudio Cirelli; Carlos Marante; Sebastian Heuser; C L M Petersson; Álvaro Jiménez Galán; Luca Argenti; Shiyang Zhong; David Busto; Marcus Isinger; Saikat Nandi; Sylvain Maclot; Linnea Rading; Per Johnsson; Mathieu Gisselbrecht; Matteo Lucchini; Lukas Gallmann; J Marcus Dahlström; Eva Lindroth; Anne L'Huillier; Fernando Martín; Ursula Keller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  High-flux ultrafast extreme-ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy at 18.4 MHz pulse repetition rate.

Authors:  T Saule; S Heinrich; J Schötz; N Lilienfein; M Högner; O deVries; M Plötner; J Weitenberg; D Esser; J Schulte; P Russbueldt; J Limpert; M F Kling; U Kleineberg; I Pupeza
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Attosecond intra-valence band dynamics and resonant-photoemission delays in W(110).

Authors:  S Heinrich; T Saule; M Högner; Y Cui; V S Yakovlev; I Pupeza; U Kleineberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.