| Literature DB >> 27958226 |
Liang Shan1, Mi Zheng2, Yuan Zhang1, Yuan Qu3, Tian Niu1, Qing Gu4, Kun Liu1, Xin Xia1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retinal edema is the major complication of retinal vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy; it can damage visual function by influencing macular region. This study was to establish a rat retinal edema model and explore the related VEGF expression and observe the responses to anti-VEGF drugs in this model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27958226 PMCID: PMC5198529 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.195463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Retinal morphological changes through fundus photography at different time points in each group (n = 6). (a) Edema group; (b) Ranibizumab group; (c) Conbercept group; (d) ZY1 group. Black arrows: Disappearance of the optic disc pit; White arrows: Retinal whitening; Yellow arrows: Retinal vasoconstriction; Blue arrows: Vessel expansion and tortuosity.
Figure 2Vascular abnormalities through fluorescein fundus angiography at different time points in each group (n = 6). (a) Edema group; (b) Ranibizumab group; (c) Conbercept group; (d) ZY1 group. Black arrows: Fluorescence leakage; White arrows: Vessel expansion and tortuosity.
Figure 3Retinal edema through optical coherence tomography at different time points in each group (n = 6). (a1-a6) Edema group; (b1-b6) Ranibizumab group; (c1-c6) Conbercept group; (d1-d6) ZY1 group. Pictures from top to bottom show changes of retinal layers, in order on day 0 (a1, b1, c1, d1), day 1 (a2, b2, c2, d2), day 2 (a3, b3, c3, d3), day 4 (a4, b4, c4, d4), day 7 (a5, b5, c5, d5), and day 14 (a6, b6, c6, d6).
Comparison of the mean retinal thickness data for each group at each time point (μm, n = 6)
| Time (day) | Control group | Edema group | Ranibizumab group | Conbercept group | ZY1 group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 216 ± 2 | 215 ± 3 | 216 ± 2 | 216 ± 3 | 217 ± 3 | 0.151 | 0.958 |
| 1 | 215 ± 4 | 287 ± 7* | 278 ± 4† | 288 ± 3 | 286 ± 6 | 134.190 | <0.001 |
| 2 | 216 ± 2 | 310 ± 10* | 274 ± 7† | 284 ± 6† | 290 ± 11† | 64.367 | <0.001 |
| 4 | 216 ± 3 | 252 ± 8* | 256 ± 6 | 239 ± 6† | 247 ± 7 | 20.000 | <0.001 |
| 7 | 217 ± 2 | 225 ± 8 | 230 ± 7 | 219 ± 5 | 225 ± 6 | 2.117 | 0.153 |
| 14 | 217 ± 3 | 191 ± 6* | 212 ± 10† | 199 ± 5 | 186 ± 6 | 13.192 | 0.001 |
All data were expressed as mean ± SD. *P<0.01 versus Control group, †P<0.05 versus Edema group. SD: Standard deviation.
Comparison of the ELISA results for each group at each examined time point (pg/ml, n = 4)
| Time (day) | Control group | Edema group | Ranibizumab group | Conbercept group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 13.48 ± 1.28 | 13.48 ± 1.28 | 13.48 ± 1.28 | 13.48 ± 1.28 | 0 | 1.000 |
| 1 | 15.21 ± 1.41 | 44.43 ± 2.90* | 26.90 ± 3.57† | 40.29 ± 6.68 | 31.269 | <0.001 |
| 2 | 14.21 ± 1.67 | 36.00 ± 1.27* | 22.36 ± 1.12† | 29.92 ± 0.93† | 163.789 | <0.001 |
| 4 | 14.23 ± 1.82 | 15.17 ± 2.63 | 15.77 ± 2.64 | 15.52 ± 2.05 | 0.325 | 0.807 |
All data were expressed as mean ± SD.*P<0.001 versus Control group, †P<0.01versus Edema group. SD: Standard deviation.
Figure 4Changes of vascular endothelial growth factor protein expression level in each group at different time points. *P < 0.01 versus control group; †P < 0.05 versus edema group.