Literature DB >> 27957856

High-throughput Identification of DNA-Encoded IgG Ligands that Distinguish Active and Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections.

Kimberly R Mendes1,2, Marie Lynne Malone3,1, John Maina Ndungu2, Irena Suponitsky-Kroyter2, Valerie J Cavett3, Patrick J McEnaney3, Andrew B MacConnell3,1, Todd M Doran3, Katharina Ronacher4, Kim Stanley4, Ofelia Utset2, Gerhard Walzl4, Brian M Paegel3, Thomas Kodadek3.   

Abstract

The circulating antibody repertoire encodes a patient's health status and pathogen exposure history, but identifying antibodies with diagnostic potential usually requires knowledge of the antigen(s). We previously circumvented this problem by screening libraries of bead-displayed small molecules against case and control serum samples to discover "epitope surrogates" (ligands of IgGs enriched in the case sample). Here, we describe an improved version of this technology that employs DNA-encoded libraries and high-throughput FACS-based screening to discover epitope surrogates that differentiate noninfectious/latent (LTB) patients from infectious/active TB (ATB) patients, which is imperative for proper treatment selection and antibiotic stewardship. Normal control/LTB (10 patients each, NCL) and ATB (10 patients) serum pools were screened against a library (5 × 106 beads, 448 000 unique compounds) using fluorescent antihuman IgG to label hit compound beads for FACS. Deep sequencing decoded all hit structures and each hit's occurrence frequencies. ATB hits were pruned of NCL hits and prioritized for resynthesis based on occurrence and homology. Several structurally homologous families were identified and 16/21 resynthesized representative hits validated as selective ligands of ATB serum IgGs (p < 0.005). The native secreted TB protein Ag85B (though not the E. coli recombinant form) competed with one of the validated ligands for binding to antibodies, suggesting that it mimics a native Ag85B epitope. The use of DNA-encoded libraries and FACS-based screening in epitope surrogate discovery reveals thousands of potential hit structures. Distilling this list down to several consensus chemical structures yielded a diagnostic panel for ATB composed of thermally stable and economically produced small molecule ligands in place of protein antigens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27957856      PMCID: PMC5250564          DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Biol        ISSN: 1554-8929            Impact factor:   5.100


  35 in total

Review 1.  Performance of purified antigens for serodiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen R Steingart; Nandini Dendukuri; Megan Henry; Ian Schiller; Payam Nahid; Philip C Hopewell; Andrew Ramsay; Madhukar Pai; Suman Laal
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-12-03

2.  A priori delineation of a peptide which mimics a discontinuous antigenic determinant.

Authors:  H M Geysen; S J Rodda; T J Mason
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.407

3.  Role of the major antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cell wall biogenesis.

Authors:  J T Belisle; V D Vissa; T Sievert; K Takayama; P J Brennan; G S Besra
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Subtractive screening with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis surface protein phage display library.

Authors:  Shanshan Liu; Wenyu Han; Changjiang Sun; Liancheng Lei; Xin Feng; Shouqing Yan; Yuwen Diao; Yu Gao; Honglei Zhao; Qianhong Liu; Cuimei Yao; Minsi Li
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.131

5.  Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome.

Authors:  Shajo Kunnath-Velayudhan; Hugh Salamon; Hui-Yun Wang; Amy L Davidow; Douglas M Molina; Vu T Huynh; Daniela M Cirillo; Gerd Michel; Elizabeth A Talbot; Mark D Perkins; Philip L Felgner; Xiaowu Liang; Maria L Gennaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Profiling the humoral immune response to infection by using proteome microarrays: high-throughput vaccine and diagnostic antigen discovery.

Authors:  D Huw Davies; Xiaowu Liang; Jenny E Hernandez; Arlo Randall; Siddiqua Hirst; Yunxiang Mu; Kimberly M Romero; Toai T Nguyen; Mina Kalantari-Dehaghi; Shane Crotty; Pierre Baldi; Luis P Villarreal; Philip L Felgner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The antigen 85 complex: a major secretion product of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  H G Wiker; M Harboe
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-12

8.  Decoding split and pool combinatorial libraries with electron-transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mohosin Sarkar; Bruce D Pascal; Caitlin Steckler; Claudio Aquino; Glenn C Micalizio; Thomas Kodadek; Michael J Chalmers
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  A liquid array platform for the multiplexed analysis of synthetic molecule-protein interactions.

Authors:  Todd M Doran; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  DNA-Encoded Solid-Phase Synthesis: Encoding Language Design and Complex Oligomer Library Synthesis.

Authors:  Andrew B MacConnell; Patrick J McEnaney; Valerie J Cavett; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.784

View more
  25 in total

1.  Solid-Phase Synthesis of β-Amino Ketones Via DNA-Compatible Organocatalytic Mannich Reactions.

Authors:  Nam Tran-Hoang; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.784

2.  Xenoprotein engineering via synthetic libraries.

Authors:  Zachary P Gates; Alexander A Vinogradov; Anthony J Quartararo; Anupam Bandyopadhyay; Zi-Ning Choo; Ethan D Evans; Kathryn H Halloran; Alexander J Mijalis; Surin K Mong; Mark D Simon; Eric A Standley; Evan D Styduhar; Sarah Z Tasker; Faycal Touti; Jessica M Weber; Jessica L Wilson; Timothy F Jamison; Bradley L Pentelute
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiplexed Enzyme Activity-Based Probe Display via Hybridization.

Authors:  Valerie Cavett; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.784

4.  Solid-Phase Synthesis of β-Hydroxy Ketones Via DNA-Compatible Organocatalytic Aldol Reactions.

Authors:  Keitou Shu; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.784

5.  Open-Air Alkylation Reactions in Photoredox-Catalyzed DNA-Encoded Library Synthesis.

Authors:  James P Phelan; Simon B Lang; Jaehoon Sim; Simon Berritt; Andrew J Peat; Katelyn Billings; Lijun Fan; Gary A Molander
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Developments with bead-based screening for novel drug discovery.

Authors:  Dehua Pei; George Appiah Kubi
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 6.098

7.  Screening one bead one compound libraries against serum using a flow cytometer: Determination of the minimum antibody concentration required for ligand discovery.

Authors:  Osayemwenre Erharuyi; Scott Simanski; Patrick J McEnaney; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Quantitative mapping of binding specificity landscapes for homologous targets by using a high-throughput method.

Authors:  Lidan Aharon; Shay-Lee Aharoni; Evette S Radisky; Niv Papo
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Library Design-Facilitated High-Throughput Sequencing of Synthetic Peptide Libraries.

Authors:  Alexander A Vinogradov; Zachary P Gates; Chi Zhang; Anthony J Quartararo; Kathryn H Halloran; Bradley L Pentelute
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.784

10.  Off-DNA DNA-Encoded Library Affinity Screening.

Authors:  Amber L Hackler; Forrest G FitzGerald; Vuong Q Dang; Alexander L Satz; Brian M Paegel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.