Literature DB >> 27957695

Global warming potential and greenhouse gas emission under different soil nutrient management practices in soybean-wheat system of central India.

Sangeeta Lenka1, Narendra Kumar Lenka2, Amar Bahadur Singh1, B Singh3, Jyothi Raghuwanshi1.   

Abstract

Soil nutrient management is a key component contributing to the greenhouse gas (GHG) flux and mitigation potential of agricultural production systems. However, the effect of soil nutrient management practices on GHG flux and global warming potential (GWP) is less understood in agricultural soils of India. The present study was conducted to compare three nutrient management systems practiced for nine consecutive years in a soybean-wheat cropping system in the Vertisols of India, in terms of GHG flux and GWP. The treatments were composed of 100% organic (ONM), 100% inorganic (NPK), and integrated nutrient management (INM) with 50% organic + 50% inorganic inputs. The gas samples for GHGs (CO2, CH4, and N2O) were collected by static chamber method at about 15-day interval during 2012-13 growing season. The change in soil organic carbon (SOC) content was estimated in terms of the changes in SOC stock in the 0-15 cm soil over the 9-year period covering 2004 to 2013. There was a net uptake of CH4 in all the treatments in both soybean and wheat crop seasons. The cumulative N2O and CO2 emissions were in the order of INM > ONM > NPK with significant difference between treatments (p < 0.05) in both the crop seasons. The annual GWP, expressed in terms of CH4 and N2O emission, also followed the same trend and was estimated to be 1126, 1002, and 896 kg CO2 eq ha-1 year-1 under INM, ONM, and NPK treatments, respectively. However, the change in SOC stock was significantly higher under ONM (1250 kg ha-1 year-1) followed by INM (417 kg ha-1 year-1) and least under NPK (198 kg ha-1 year-1) treatment. The wheat equivalent yield was similar under ONM and INM treatments and was significantly lower under NPK treatment. Thus, the GWP per unit grain yield was lower under ONM followed by NPK and INM treatments and varied from 250, 261, and 307 kg CO2 eq Mg-1 grain yield under ONM, NPK, and INM treatments, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change mitigation; GWP per unit yield; Organic farming; Trace gas emission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27957695     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8189-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture.

Authors:  Pete Smith; Daniel Martino; Zucong Cai; Daniel Gwary; Henry Janzen; Pushpam Kumar; Bruce McCarl; Stephen Ogle; Frank O'Mara; Charles Rice; Bob Scholes; Oleg Sirotenko; Mark Howden; Tim McAllister; Genxing Pan; Vladimir Romanenkov; Uwe Schneider; Sirintornthep Towprayoon; Martin Wattenbach; Jo Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting agricultural management for climate change in developing countries: providing the basis for action.

Authors:  Stephen M Ogle; Lydia Olander; Lini Wollenberg; Todd Rosenstock; Francesco Tubiello; Keith Paustian; Leandro Buendia; Alison Nihart; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Greenhouse gas emissions from a wheat-maize double cropping system with different nitrogen fertilization regimes.

Authors:  Xiao-Kang Hu; Fang Su; Xiao-Tang Ju; Bing Gao; Oene Oenema; Peter Christie; Bin-Xiang Huang; Rong-Feng Jiang; Fu-Suo Zhang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Unexpected stimulation of soil methane uptake as emergent property of agricultural soils following bio-based residue application.

Authors:  Adrian Ho; Andreas Reim; Sang Yoon Kim; Marion Meima-Franke; Aad Termorshuizen; Wietse de Boer; Wim H van der Putten; Paul L E Bodelier
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?--a meta-analysis of European research.

Authors:  H L Tuomisto; I D Hodge; P Riordan; D W Macdonald
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 6.789

7.  Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in irrigated cropping systems in northeastern Colorado.

Authors:  Arvin R Mosier; Ardell D Halvorson; Curtis A Reule; Xuejun J Liu
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  Greenhouse gas mitigation in rice-wheat system with leaf color chart-based urea application.

Authors:  Arti Bhatia; Himanshu Pathak; Niveta Jain; Pawan K Singh; Ritu Tomer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  [Characterization of CH4, N2O emission and selection of rice cultivars in double cropping rice fields].

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Fu; Hua-Wu Zhu; Can Chen; Huang Huang
Journal:  Huan Jing Ke Xue       Date:  2012-07

Review 10.  How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Helmut Haberl; Alexander Popp; Karl-Heinz Erb; Christian Lauk; Richard Harper; Francesco N Tubiello; Alexandre de Siqueira Pinto; Mostafa Jafari; Saran Sohi; Omar Masera; Hannes Böttcher; Göran Berndes; Mercedes Bustamante; Helal Ahammad; Harry Clark; Hongmin Dong; Elnour A Elsiddig; Cheikh Mbow; Nijavalli H Ravindranath; Charles W Rice; Carmenza Robledo Abad; Anna Romanovskaya; Frank Sperling; Mario Herrero; Joanna I House; Steven Rose
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.