Literature DB >> 27957475

Perceived Risk of Violence in Various Hospital Levels and Departments in Urban and Rural China.

Tingmei Yan1, Shuang Li2, Guowei Pan2, Bo Qu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27957475      PMCID: PMC5149484     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Workplace violence has serious consequences for the involved medical workers and the entire health care system (1). It can result in a variety of adverse effects on medical professionals, such as anger, fear, depression, anxiety, job dissatisfaction and demission (2) Research reported that half of abused nurses considered leaving the profession (3). In China, workplace violence against medical workers is more common and serious, especially in recent years (4). A study of 12 hospitals revealed that the incidence of verbal abuse and threats to health professionals was 96% in 2009, and the incidence of physical injuries was 63.7% in 2012 (5). However, the majority of studies were designed to assess the incidence of violence among doctors or nurses who experienced workplace violence. Research on the perception level of risk of violence is rare. The aim of this study was to explore the level of perceived risk of violence in hospitals and the departmental distribution across various levels of hospitals. A cross-sectional survey was conducted between Jun and Jul 2011 in Liaoning Province, which is in northeastern China and comprises three cities and three counties. It concluded 3292 registered health professionals. The survey was answered on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5: 1) never, 2) rarely, 3) sometimes, 4) frequently, and 5) always. The average test-retest reliability of the scale was sufficient. The average score of perceived occupational risk of violence was 3.16±1.31 for all health professionals, 3.05±1.34 for doctors and 3.29±1.25 for nurses. Nurses reported a significantly higher score than doctors (P<0.05). The distribution of the perception of risk of violence across various hospital levels and departments is shown in Table 1. Those who worked in urban and tertiary hospitals perceived a higher risk of violence. Overall, those who worked in emergency departments perceived the highest risk of violence, but doctors who worked in ICU departments had the highest perceived risk of violence, and nurses who worked in pediatrics perceived a higher risk of violence than those who worked in departments other than the emergency department. Comparisons of demographic and practice-related factors across the level of medical workers’ perceived risk of violence are shown in Table 2. Males perceived a higher level of risk of violence than females. Those with higher education perceived a higher risk of violence. Medical workers who worked longer hours were more likely to perceive a risk of violence. Those with a lower professional position perceived a higher risk. Age showed an inverse correlation with perceived risk of violence. Our study indicated that male doctors were more likely to perceive a risk of violence than female doctors. The association between perceived risk of violence and education was observed only in doctors and not in nurses.
Table 1:

Perception level of violence risk at different hospital level and department

VariableDoctorNurseAll
Area
Urban3.30±1.283.43±1.233.36±1.26
Rural2.77±1.353.07±1.252.88±1.32
Hospital level
Tertiary3.85±1.143.68±1.143.76±1.14
Second3.12±1.203.44±1.183.29±1.20
Community2.80±1.333.06±1.272.90±1.31
Department
  Emergency4.24±1.014.27±0.794.26±0.87
  Surgery3.86±1.133.61±1.183.75±1.16
  Icu4.63±0.523.30±1.133.68±1.16
  Pediatrics2.91±1.333.68±1.143.37±1.27
  Otolaryngology3.30±1.373.35±0.953.32±1.23
  Oncology3.26±1.233.39±1.173.32±1.19
  Internal medicine3.16±1.233.50±1.163.32±1.21
  Anesthesiology3.23±1.033.00±1.013.22±1.02
  Obstetrics2.71±1.333.33±1.423.14±1.41
  Operating room3.43±1.813.08±1.023.11±1.09
  Gynecology2.74±1.173.18±1.202.94±1.20
  Medical laboratory2.91±1.292.77±1.462.90±1.31
  Community doctor2.78±1.172.64±1.312.75±1.20
  Other supporting2.62±1.323.01±1.232.62±1.32
Table 2:

Score of perceived violence risk in relation to categorical variables

Demographic characteristicsDoctors (n=1863)Nurses (n=1434)Total (n=3297)
GenderMale3.25±1.373.38±1.163.25±1.36
Female2.87±1.29[**]3.30±1.25[*]3.12±1.28[*]
Age (yr)18−3.23±1.323.35±1.203.30±1.26
35−3.17±1.303.37±1.213.24±1.27
45+2.76±1.36[**]3.10±1.36**2.88±1.37[**]
EducationHigh School or below2.47±1.283.06±1.302.78±1.33
Junior college2.93±1.343.35±1.243.14±1.31
Bachelor or above3.47±1.22[**]3.59±1.113.51±1.19[**]
Professional PositionSenior doctor3.50±1.223.83±0.983.53±1.21
Medium3.20±1.333.34±1.203.26±1.28
Primary2.90±1.333.28±1.283.11±1.32
Assistant or below2.49±1.29**2.82±1.272.54±1.29**
NightNo2.65±1.293.06±1.282.82±1.30
ShiftYes3.48±1.253.52±1.173.50±1.21
WorkloadOverload3.76±1.273.89±1.093.82±1.19
Full load2.91±1.283.17±1.213.02±0.26
Half load or low2.67±1.31**2.78±1.26**3.16±1.31[**]

and

P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively

Perception level of violence risk at different hospital level and department Score of perceived violence risk in relation to categorical variables and P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively Workload was associated with the perception of risk of violence. Night shift work was also found to be significantly associated with workplace violence among nurses and doctors. In conclusion, this study documented which medical professionals were subject to a higher risk of workplace violence. Thus, effective measures must be adopted to prevent workplace violence in Chinese health care settings.
  5 in total

1.  Chinese doctors are under threat.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Work-related aggression and violence committed by patients and its psychological influence on doctors.

Authors:  Keigo Saeki; Nozomi Okamoto; Kimiko Tomioka; Kenji Obayashi; Hisayuki Nishioka; Kenryo Ohara; Norio Kurumatani
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Workplace violence and influencing factors among medical professionals in China.

Authors:  Siying Wu; Wei Zhu; Huangyuan Li; Shaowei Lin; Wenli Chai; Xiaorong Wang
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Patient and visitor violence towards staff on medical and psychiatric wards in India.

Authors:  B N Raveesh; Peter Lepping; Sri V K Lanka; Jim Turner; Murali Krishna
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Frequency and consequences of violence and aggression towards employees in the German healthcare and welfare system: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anja Schablon; Annett Zeh; Dana Wendeler; Claudia Peters; Claudia Wohlert; Melanie Harling; Albert Nienhaus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Workplace violence against medical staff of Chinese children's hospitals: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Chun-Mei Yan; Lei Shi; Hui-Tong Mu; Xin Li; An-Qi Li; Cheng-Song Zhao; Tao Sun; Lei Gao; Li-Hua Fan; Yi Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Depressive symptoms and workplace-violence-related risk factors among otorhinolaryngology nurses and physicians in Northern China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Huiying Fang; Xiaowen Zhao; Haicheng Yang; Peihang Sun; Ying Li; Kexin Jiang; Peng Li; Mingli Jiao; Ming Liu; Hong Qiao; Qunhong Wu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.