| Literature DB >> 27957434 |
Aravindan Achuthan1, Vasumathi Ayyallu Madangopal2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to extract the histogram features for text analysis and, to classify the types of Bio Medical Waste (BMW) for garbage disposal and management.Entities:
Keywords: Bio medical waste; Median filter; Sensitivity; Specificity
Year: 2016 PMID: 27957434 PMCID: PMC5149491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig. 1:Process of Median filtering
Fig. 2:Overall flow of the proposed BMW identification and classification
Fig 3:Process of MLTrP based feature extraction
Fig 4:Process of Magnitude pattern extraction
Fig. 5:Phasor diagram for tetra pattern calculation
Fig. 6:Input BMW Image
Fig. 7:Filtered Image
Fig. 8:Texture Feature Extraction
Fig. 9:Confusion Matrix for actual and predicted classes
Classification accuracy for existing and proposed texture feature extraction techniques (24)
| BRINT2_CS_CM (MS9) | 98.63 | 96.55 | 92.64 | 84.54 | 74.26 |
| CLBP_CS (MS9) | 92.96 | 90.53 | 82.2 | 69.77 | 50.88 |
| dis(S+M) | 94.77 | 93.22 | 76.67 | 54.81 | 43.33 |
| LTP (MS9) | 92.89 | 91.99 | 86.11 | 77.71 | 64.19 |
| NRLBP (MS9) | 88.63 | 88.96 | 83.87 | 78.98 | 67.11 |
| MLTrP (Proposed) | 99.21 | 98.44 | 95.65 | 92.86 | 91.3 |
Fig. 10:Comparative analysis graph for existing SVM and proposed RVM classifiers.
Performance Measure of RVM Classification
| Correct Rate | 0.9565 |
| Error Rate | 0.0435 |
| Last Correct Rate | 0.9565 |
| Last Error Rate | 0.0435 |
| Classified Rate | 1 |
| Sensitivity | 1 |
| Specificity | 0.9196 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.9167 |
| Negative Predictive Value | 1 |
| Positive Likelihood (PL) | 12 |
| Negative Likelihood (NL) | 0 |
| Prevalence | 0.4783 |
| Accuracy | 95.6522% |