Literature DB >> 27957057

Diastolic Function in Normal Sinus Rhythm vs. Chronic Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison by Fractionation of E-wave Deceleration Time into Stiffness and Relaxation Components.

Sina Mossahebi1, Sándor J Kovács1.   

Abstract

Although the electrophysiologic derangement responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been elucidated, how AF remodels the ventricular chamber and affects diastolic function (DF) has not been fully characterized. The previously validated Parametrized Diastolic Filling (PDF) formalism models suction-initiated filling kinematically and generates error-minimized fits to E-wave contours using unique load (xo), relaxation (c), and stiffness (k) parameters. It predicts that E-wave deceleration time (DT) is a function of both stiffness and relaxation. Ascribing DTs to stiffness and DTr to relaxation such that DT=DTs+DTr is legitimate because of causality and their predicted and observed high correlation (r=0.82 and r=0.94) with simultaneous (diastatic) chamber stiffness (dP/dV) and isovolumic relaxation (tau), respectively. We analyzed simultaneous echocardiography-cardiac catheterization data and compared 16 age matched, chronic AF subjects to 16, normal sinus rhythm (NSR) subjects (650 beats). All subjects had diastatic intervals. Conventional DF parameters (DT, AT, Epeak, Edur, E-VTI, E/E') and E-wave derived PDF parameters (c, k, DTs, DTr) were compared. Total DT and DTs, DTr in AF were shorter than in NSR (p<0.005), chamber stiffness, (k) in AF was higher than in NSR (p<0.001). For NSR, 75% of DT was due to stiffness and 25% was due to relaxation whereas for AF 81% of DT was due to stiffness and 19% was due to relaxation (p<0.005). We conclude that compared to NSR, increased chamber stiffness is one measurable consequence of chamber remodeling in chronic, rate controlled AF. A larger fraction of E-wave DT in AF is due to stiffness compared to NSR. By trending individual subjects, this method can elucidate and characterize the beneficial or adverse long-term effects on chamber remodeling due to alternative therapies in terms of chamber stiffness and relaxation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial Fibrillation; Diastolic Function; E-Wave DT; LV Relaxation; LV Stiffness

Year:  2014        PMID: 27957057      PMCID: PMC5135234          DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation        ISSN: 1941-6911


  35 in total

1.  Chamber properties from transmitral flow: prediction of average and passive left ventricular diastolic stiffness.

Authors:  J B Lisauskas; J Singh; A W Bowman; S J Kovács
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-07

Review 2.  The echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. A current perspective.

Authors:  C P Appleton; M S Firstenberg; M J Garcia; J D Thomas
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.213

3.  Kinematic modeling-based left ventricular diastatic (passive) chamber stiffness determination with in-vivo validation.

Authors:  Sina Mossahebi; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  E-wave deceleration time may not provide an accurate determination of LV chamber stiffness if LV relaxation/viscoelasticity is unknown.

Authors:  Leonid Shmuylovich; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 5.  Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography.

Authors:  Sherif F Nagueh; Christopher P Appleton; Thierry C Gillebert; Paolo N Marino; Jae K Oh; Otto A Smiseth; Alan D Waggoner; Frank A Flachskampf; Patricia A Pellikka; Arturo Evangelista
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 6.  New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Ionic mechanisms of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  R F Bosch; X Zeng; J B Grammer; K Popovic; C Mewis; V Kühlkamp
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort.

Authors:  D Li; S Fareh; T K Leung; S Nattel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Thomas J Wang; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan; Eric P Leip; Philip A Wolf; Ralph B D'Agostino; Joanne M Murabito; William B Kannel; Emelia J Benjamin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Determination of left ventricular chamber stiffness from the time for deceleration of early left ventricular filling.

Authors:  W C Little; M Ohno; D W Kitzman; J D Thomas; C P Cheng
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Alternative diastolic function models of ventricular longitudinal filling velocity are mathematically identical.

Authors:  Druv Bhagavan; William M Padovano; Sándor J Kovács
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.733

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.