| Literature DB >> 27956800 |
Kenichi Iwasaki1, Yun-Wen Zheng1, Soichiro Murata1, Hiromu Ito1, Ken Nakayama1, Tomohiro Kurokawa1, Naoki Sano1, Takeshi Nowatari1, Myra O Villareal1, Yumiko N Nagano1, Hiroko Isoda1, Hirofumi Matsui1, Nobuhiro Ohkohchi1.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the anticancer mechanisms of the monoterpenoid alcohol linalool in human colon cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Electron spin resonance; Linalool; Lipid peroxidation; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27956800 PMCID: PMC5124981 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i44.9765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Figure 1Anticancer effect of linalool. A: HCT 116 cells in the control group showing rapid proliferation; B: HCT 116 cells treated with 250 μmol/L linalool for 24 h showed shrinkage of cells and tightly packed organelles; C: A dose-dependent increase in the cytotoxic effect of linalool was observed in all cancer cell lines. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Anticancer mechanism of linalool. A: TUNEL staining of HCT 116 cells in the control group; B: Staining of HCT 116 cells treated with 100 μmol/L linalool; C: Staining of HCT 116 cells treated with 50 nmol/L staurosporine. The corresponding percentage of TUNEL-positive cells (white arrow) was 0.7% ± 0.7% (A), 10.5% ± 7.7% (B), and 25.1% ± 11.2% (C); D: The percentage of apoptotic cells in each group (mean ± SD, n = 10). aP < 0.05 vs control group; bP < 0.05 vs 100 μmol/L linalool group; E: Flow cytometry using Annexin V for the detection of live cells, cells showing early and late apoptosis, and cell death; F: Percentages of early and late apoptosis fraction. cP < 0.05 vs control group; dP < 0.01 vs control group; eP < 0.05 vs control group; one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, n = 3.
Figure 3Changes in mouse tumor size and weight after drug administration. A: The pictures show the size of the tumors in each group. Upper: control group. Middle: 100 mg/kg linalool group. Lower: 200 mg/kg linalool group. As concentration of linalool increased, the xenografted tumor size decreased macroscopically; B: Tumor weight after removal showed a significant decrease in the group of 200 mg/kg administration, compared to that of control group [expressed as geometric mean, n = 5 (control), 5 (100 mg/kg linalool), 6 (200 mg/kg linalool)], aP < 0.05 vs control group; one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test); C: No significant change was detected in serum AST and ALT level in each group; values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 5 (control), 5 (100 mg/kg linalool), 6 (200 mg/kg linalool).
Figure 4Oxidative stress assay in vitro. A: Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy performed 30 min after linalool treatment. The signal intensity of 1:2:2:1 suggests generation of hydroxyl radical, the strongest reactive oxygen species (ROS); B: The signal of HCT 116 without linalool at the same time period; C: Diphenyl-1-pyrenylphosphine (DPPP) assay performed to detect lipid peroxidation showed that linalool induced cell membrane lipid peroxidation as green fluorescent on the cell surface(white arrow); D: The cell membrane lipid peroxidation was not observed in without linalool treatment group.
Figure 5Oxidative stress assay in vivo. Although accumulation of 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) was observed in the tumors from the high-dose linalool group, it was not observed in stomach or liver tissues, except for the physiological accumulation (black arrow) of 4-HNE near the basal membrane of the stomach.