Literature DB >> 2795629

The student with a writing block--the ethics of psychotherapy.

S Bloch1.   

Abstract

The potential role of the psychotherapist as ethical interventionist is considered with reference to a patient who presented with a writing block. The case for the therapist to act paternalistically is followed by the counterargument which revolves around the respect for autonomy. A bridge between these two opposing positions is then offered which depends on viewing informed consent as a dynamic process. As part of this procedure it is made clear that while autonomy is the desired end-state of psychotherapy, it is not the be all and end all of treatment. Therapy is necessarily value-laden since it aims for the enhancement of the patient's state of autonomy; it is value-free inasmuch as the therapist desists from guiding the patient in how she should live her life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2795629      PMCID: PMC1375807          DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.3.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Where respect for autonomy is not the answer.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-01-04

2.  Informed consent and the psychiatric patient.

Authors:  A R Dyer; S Bloch
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.