Literature DB >> 27956045

Biomechanical properties of early keratoconus: Suppressed deformation signal wave.

Hassan Hashemi1, Asghar Beiranvand2, Abbasali Yekta3, Amir Asharlous3, Mehdi Khabazkhoob4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the diagnostic validity of different corneal biomechanical parameters for the detection of early keratoconus
METHODS: Sixty-one eyes with a diagnosis of early keratoconus and 61 topographically normal eyes were enrolled in the study. All participants underwent testing with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), and 40 indices from each cornea were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation: SD) of keratometry and central corneal thickness in keratoconic corneas was 46.9 (2.5) diopter (D) and 473 (31) μm, respectively. Of the 40 evaluated indices, 32 showed a significant difference between the two groups using t-test (p<0.05). According to the results of logistic regression, the indices of height from the lowest to the highest point in peak 2 (H21) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with R2=0.79 were the best predictors of early keratoconus (p<0.001). H21 ≤190 with a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 91.8%, respectively, and CRF≤8.6 with sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85.3%, respectively, yielded an overall diagnostic accuracy of 97.3%.
CONCLUSION: This study results point to the important role of novel waveform-derived indices measured by ORA, along with conventional biomechanical indices, for the early diagnosis of keratoconus. The best predictors of keratoconus in its early stages are H21 and CRF which showed very high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of early keratoconus.
Copyright © 2016 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanical properties; Keratoconus; Ocular response analyzer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27956045     DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  4 in total

1.  Fourteen years follow-up of a stable unilateral Keratoconus: unique case report of clinical, tomographical and biomechanical stability.

Authors:  Alain Saad; Maria Rizk; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Advances in Biomechanical Parameters for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part III.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mahsaw N Motlagh; Michael S Murri; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Machine Learning Algorithms to Detect Subclinical Keratoconus: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Howard Maile; Ji-Peng Olivia Li; Daniel Gore; Marcello Leucci; Padraig Mulholland; Scott Hau; Anita Szabo; Ismail Moghul; Konstantinos Balaskas; Kaoru Fujinami; Pirro Hysi; Alice Davidson; Petra Liskova; Alison Hardcastle; Stephen Tuft; Nikolas Pontikos
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  A Potential Screening Index of Corneal Biomechanics in Healthy Subjects, Forme Fruste Keratoconus Patients and Clinical Keratoconus Patients.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Xiao Qin; Hui Zhang; Di Zhang; Li-Li Guo; Hai-Xia Zhang; Ying Wu; Ying Jie; Lin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.