Literature DB >> 2795417

Gingival resistance to probing forces. II. The effect of inflammation and pressure on probe displacement in beagle dog gingivitis.

J J Garnick1, J G Keagle, J R Searle, G E King, W O Thompson.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the effect of gingival inflammation and probing pressure on probe tip placement in relation to the base of the gingival crevice and the most coronal connective tissue attachment fibers. Nine young male beagle dogs were divided into three groups as determined by clinical status of the gingiva following implementation of a protocol designed to produce gingival health and disease. An electromechanical device was used to advance 0.6 mm diameter probes into the facial gingival crevices of selected teeth and to obtain force-displacement curves. The instrument stopped the probe at pressure of either 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280, or 2560 kPa which were randomly allocated to 12 test teeth in each dog. After the probe came to rest, it was attached to the tooth. When all 12 probes were attached, the animal was sacrificed. Blocks consisting of gingiva, probe, and tooth were processed to obtain two buccolingual sections, one containing the probe and the other immediately adjacent to it. Clinical and histometric measurements were performed and the data evaluated. Although three groups of animals were discernable by clinical criteria, only two groups, health and disease, could be formulated based on the degree of histologic inflammation. The histologic grouping was used in data analysis. Histometric distances from the cemento-enamel junction to the base of the crevice (cJ), to most coronal connective tissue attachment (cC) and to the probe tip (cP) all increased with change from health to disease. However, changes in health/disease did not influence difference between distances (cP-cJ,cP-cC).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2795417     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.9.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy and reproducibility of probe forces during simulated periodontal pocket depth measurements.

Authors:  K N Al Shayeb; W Turner; D G Gillam
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2014-03-18

2.  Evaluation of an Electronic Periodontal Probe Versus a Manual Probe.

Authors:  Antonio Renatus; Lars Trentzsch; Antje Schönfelder; Fabian Schwarzenberger; Holger Jentsch
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 3.  Periodic health examination, 1993 update: 3. Periodontal diseases: classification, diagnosis, risk factors and prevention. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  A I Ismail; D W Lewis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Comparative evaluation of accuracy of periodontal probing depth and attachment levels using a Florida probe versus traditional probes.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; S K Rath; Parul Lohra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-10-23

5.  Enamel matrix protein derivative and/or synthetic bone substitute for the treatment of mandibular class II buccal furcation defects. A 12-month randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Lucas Araujo Queiroz; Mauro Pedrine Santamaria; Marcio Z Casati; Karina Silverio Ruiz; Francisco Nociti; Antonio Wilson Sallum; Enilson A Sallum
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The effects of topical erythropoietin on non-surgical treatment of periodontitis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hoori Aslroosta; Siamak Yaghobee; Solmaz Akbari; Negar Kanounisabet
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 7.  The Chairside Periodontal Diagnostic Toolkit: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Tae-Jun Ko; Kevin M Byrd; Shin Ae Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.