Literature DB >> 27951550

Peritoneal Dialysis or Hemodialysis: Present and Future Trends in the United States.

Andre A Kaplan1.   

Abstract

In 2013, 88.4% of all incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients began renal replacement therapy with hemodialysis (HD) while 9.0% began with peritoneal dialysis (PD). The remaining 2.6% received a preemptive kidney transplant. In the US, outpatient HD units are widely distributed and economy of scale has resulted in HD being the most common ESRD modality. Use of PD and preemptive kidney transplant were relatively more common in younger groups and relatively less common among Black and Hispanic patients. Of note is that the new Medicare reimbursement system, known as the 'bundle', provides substantial financial incentives to do PD as opposed to in-center HD. By the end of 2013, 63.9% of all prevalent ESRD cases were receiving HD, 6.9% were being treated with PD, and 29.3% had a functioning kidney transplant. Distributions of modality use by patient characteristics generally mirror those for incident patients. PD and kidney transplant were more commonly used among patients who were younger and were more likely to be non-Hispanic Whites. Differences in the use of home dialysis (PD and HD) are largely driven by differences among individual dialysis centers or groups of centers, rather than by large-scale regional effects. Thus, the future use of PD or home HD will be driven by the proclivities of the largest dialysis providers, which, in turn, are driven by financial reimbursement.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27951550     DOI: 10.1159/000450672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrib Nephrol        ISSN: 0302-5144            Impact factor:   1.580


  8 in total

1.  Association between change in physician remuneration and use of peritoneal dialysis: a population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Trachtenberg; Amity E Quinn; Zhihai Ma; Scott Klarenbach; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Marcello Tonelli; Peter Faris; Robert Weaver; Flora Au; Jianguo Zhang; Braden Manns
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-02-18

Review 2.  The scientific principles and technological determinants of haemodialysis membranes.

Authors:  Sudhir K Bowry; Charles Chazot
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2021-12-27

Review 3.  Challenges and novel therapies for vascular access in haemodialysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Lawson; Laura E Niklason; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Effect of predictive nursing on the comfort, illness perception, metabolism of calcium and phosphorus, and complications in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Min Wang; Huiyan Rao; Yajing Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  The effects of dialysis modality choice on cognitive functions in patients with end-stage renal failure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tongbin Gao; Yongjian Ji; Yinghui Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Extracellular vesicles as regulators of kidney function and disease.

Authors:  Felix Behrens; Johannes Holle; Wolfgang M Kuebler; Szandor Simmons
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-12-18

7.  Auricular Point Acupressure Combined with Compound Lidocaine Cream to Manage Arteriovenous Fistula Puncture Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Xiaohui Liu; Wei Wei; Yaqi Wu; Xiao Jiang; Xueqin Liu; Ying Zhang; Chao Hsing Yeh; Yuejuan Zhang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Quality of life in primary caregivers of patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  Joel Monárrez-Espino; José Alberto Delgado-Valles; Gastón Ramírez-García
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.