IMPORTANCE: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) can present with very similar clinical features to multiple sclerosis (MS), but the international diagnostic imaging criteria for MS are not necessarily helpful in distinguishing these two diseases. OBJECTIVE: This multicentre study tested previously reported criteria of '(1) at least 1 lesion adjacent to the body of the lateral ventricle and in the inferior temporal lobe; or (2) the presence of a subcortical U-fibre lesion or (3) a Dawson's finger-type lesion' in an independent cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and AQP4-ab NMOSD patients and also assessed their value in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-ab positive and ab-negative NMOSD. DESIGN: Brain MRI scans were anonymised and scored on the criteria by 2 of 3 independent raters. In case of disagreement, the final opinion was made by the third rater. PARTICIPANTS: 112 patients with NMOSD (31 AQP4-ab-positive, 21 MOG-ab-positive, 16 ab-negative) or MS (44) were selected from 3 centres (Oxford, Strasbourg and Liverpool) for the presence of brain lesions. RESULTS: MRI brain lesion distribution criteria were able to distinguish RRMS with a sensitivity of 90.9% and with a specificity of 87.1% against AQP4-ab NMOSD, 95.2% against MOG-ab NMOSD and 87.5% in the heterogenous ab-negative NMOSD cohort. Over the whole NMOSD group, the specificity was 89.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the brain MRI criteria for differentiating RRMS from NMOSD are sensitive and specific for all phenotypes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
IMPORTANCE: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) can present with very similar clinical features to multiple sclerosis (MS), but the international diagnostic imaging criteria for MS are not necessarily helpful in distinguishing these two diseases. OBJECTIVE: This multicentre study tested previously reported criteria of '(1) at least 1 lesion adjacent to the body of the lateral ventricle and in the inferior temporal lobe; or (2) the presence of a subcortical U-fibre lesion or (3) a Dawson's finger-type lesion' in an independent cohort of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and AQP4-ab NMOSD patients and also assessed their value in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-ab positive and ab-negative NMOSD. DESIGN: Brain MRI scans were anonymised and scored on the criteria by 2 of 3 independent raters. In case of disagreement, the final opinion was made by the third rater. PARTICIPANTS: 112 patients with NMOSD (31 AQP4-ab-positive, 21 MOG-ab-positive, 16 ab-negative) or MS (44) were selected from 3 centres (Oxford, Strasbourg and Liverpool) for the presence of brain lesions. RESULTS: MRI brain lesion distribution criteria were able to distinguish RRMS with a sensitivity of 90.9% and with a specificity of 87.1% against AQP4-ab NMOSD, 95.2% against MOG-ab NMOSD and 87.5% in the heterogenous ab-negative NMOSD cohort. Over the whole NMOSD group, the specificity was 89.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the brain MRI criteria for differentiating RRMS from NMOSD are sensitive and specific for all phenotypes. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: S Jarius; F Paul; O Aktas; N Asgari; R C Dale; J de Seze; D Franciotta; K Fujihara; A Jacob; H J Kim; I Kleiter; T Kümpfel; M Levy; J Palace; K Ruprecht; A Saiz; C Trebst; B G Weinshenker; B Wildemann Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Matthias Baumann; Astrid Grams; Tanja Djurdjevic; Eva-Maria Wendel; Christian Lechner; Bettina Behring; Astrid Blaschek; Katharina Diepold; Astrid Eisenkölbl; Joel Fluss; Michael Karenfort; Johannes Koch; Bahadir Konuşkan; Steffen Leiz; Andreas Merkenschlager; Daniela Pohl; Mareike Schimmel; Charlotte Thiels; Barbara Kornek; Kathrin Schanda; Markus Reindl; Kevin Rostásy Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Saif Huda; Dan Whittam; Maneesh Bhojak; Jayne Chamberlain; Carmel Noonan; Anu Jacob Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 2.659
Authors: A Sebastian López-Chiriboga; Masoud Majed; James Fryer; Divyanshu Dubey; Andrew McKeon; Eoin P Flanagan; Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan; Naga Kothapalli; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; John Chen; Brian Weinshenker; Dean Wingerchuk; Jessica Sagen; Avi Gadoth; Vanda A Lennon; B Mark Keegan; Claudia Lucchinetti; Sean J Pittock Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Stefan M Gold; Anne Willing; Frank Leypoldt; Friedemann Paul; Manuel A Friese Journal: Semin Immunopathol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 9.623