Literature DB >> 2795133

Numerical matching between granule and Purkinje cells in lurcher chimeric mice: a hypothesis for the trophic rescue of granule cells from target-related cell death.

M W Vogel1, K Sunter, K Herrup.   

Abstract

Previous studies of wild-type mice or mutant-wild-type mouse chimeras using the neurological mutant staggerer have supported a numerical matching hypothesis for target-related cell death. However, analyses of chimeras of a second neurological mutant, lurcher, have suggested that there may be significant flexibility in the relationship between the numbers of pre- and postsynaptic neurons. Whereas in staggerer chimeras there is a strict proportionality between the number of cerebellar granule cells and their postsynaptic target, the Purkinje cells, in lurcher chimeras, Wetts and Herrup (1983) report a relative increase in granule cell survival. We have reexamined the numerical matching between Purkinje and granule cells in an additional 5 lurcher----wild-type and 4 wild-type----wild-type chimerase. Our findings confirm and extend the results of the previous study to show that there is a close correlation between the number of granule and Purkinje cells in +/Lc chimeras, but for any given number of Purkinje cells in the +/Lc chimeras, more granule cells survive than in staggerer chimeras or inbred mouse strains. Whereas the ratio of granule to Purkinje cells in staggerer chimeras or inbred mouse strains is constant across all target sizes, in +/Lc chimeras the ratio of granule cells to Purkinje cells increases as the number of target neurons decreases. It seems likely that the increased granule cell survival is somehow related to the delayed degeneration of the +/Lc fraction of target cells in the +/Lc chimeras. Among the possible explanations for the observed results, we favor the hypothesis that a trophic factor is produced in +/Lc chimeras in response to the deafferentation of Purkinje cells that is capable of rescuing granule cells from target-related cell death. Our preference is based, in part, on observations of the state of the dendritic tree of the wild-type Purkinje cells that survive in +/Lc chimeras (Caddy et al., 1986).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2795133      PMCID: PMC6569898     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  16 in total

Review 1.  Novel approaches to studying the genetic basis of cerebellar development.

Authors:  Samin A Sajan; Kathryn E Waimey; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Sonic hedgehog patterning during cerebellar development.

Authors:  Annarita De Luca; Valentina Cerrato; Elisa Fucà; Elena Parmigiani; Annalisa Buffo; Ketty Leto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Prenatal exposure to ethanol affects postnatal neurogenesis in thalamus.

Authors:  Sandra M Mooney; Michael W Miller
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Cytochrome P450 27A1 Deficiency and Regional Differences in Brain Sterol Metabolism Cause Preferential Cholestanol Accumulation in the Cerebellum.

Authors:  Natalia Mast; Kyle W Anderson; Joseph B Lin; Yong Li; Illarion V Turko; Curtis Tatsuoka; Ingemar Bjorkhem; Irina A Pikuleva
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Maternal immune activation produces cerebellar hyperplasia and alterations in motor and social behaviors in male and female mice.

Authors:  Tooka Aavani; Shadna A Rana; Richard Hawkes; Quentin J Pittman
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Meander tail reveals a discrete developmental unit in the mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  M E Ross; C Fletcher; C A Mason; M E Hatten; N Heintz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A role for p27/Kip1 in the control of cerebellar granule cell precursor proliferation.

Authors:  K Miyazawa; T Himi; V Garcia; H Yamagishi; S Sato; Y Ishizaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comparison of Cbln1 and Cbln2 functions using transgenic and knockout mice.

Authors:  Yongqi Rong; Peng Wei; Jennifer Parris; Hong Guo; Roberto Pattarini; Kristen Correia; Leyi Li; Sheila V Kusnoor; Ariel Y Deutch; James I Morgan
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 9.  Cell death, Bcl-2, Bax, and the cerebellum.

Authors:  Michael W Vogel
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Developmental increase of total cell numbers in the murine cerebellum.

Authors:  Lachezar Surchev; Tommy A Nazwar; Gunnar Weisheit; Karl Schilling
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.