Sara Beattie1, Sophie Lebel2, Danielle Petricone-Westwood2, Keith G Wilson2,3,4, Cheryl Harris2,5,4, Gerald Devins6,7,8, Lothar Huebsch4, Jason Tay1,4. 1. Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. 2. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital Rehabilitation Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 4. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 7. Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a demanding treatment. Spouses of HSCT patients assume caregiving responsibilities that can induce feelings of burden and disrupt relationship equity. On the basis of equity theory, we propose a conceptual framework examining the individual and dyadic experience of HSCT patients and their caregivers. The model includes feelings of inequity, patient self-perceived burden, caregiver burden, and distress. METHODS: The HSCT patients and their spousal caregivers were recruited prior to HSCT between March 2011 and September 2012. Each member of the dyad self-administered a questionnaire package. RESULTS: Seventy-two dyads were included in the path analyses. Our model demonstrated an inadequate statistical fit; however, with one modification, an adequate to good fit was obtained: χ2 (df) = 6.01(5), normed χ2 = 1.20, standardized root mean square residual = 0.048, comparative fit index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.96, and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05 (90% CI, 0.00-0.18). As hypothesized, pre-HSCT caregiver burden mediates the relationship between caregiver underbenefit and caregiver distress. However, patient self-perceived burden was not associated with patient distress; rather, patient perception of overbenefit was related to patient distress. In our modified model, the results demonstrate that patient overbenefit influenced caregiver burden; however, there was not a reciprocal influence, because caregiver variables did not affect patient variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed theoretical framework describes patients' and caregivers' individual experience of distress before HSCT but does not as clearly encompass the dyadic experience. Addressing perceived imbalances and providing psycho-education on role changes within HSCT dyads before transplantation may be a useful prehabilitation strategy for preventing distress.
OBJECTIVE: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a demanding treatment. Spouses of HSCT patients assume caregiving responsibilities that can induce feelings of burden and disrupt relationship equity. On the basis of equity theory, we propose a conceptual framework examining the individual and dyadic experience of HSCT patients and their caregivers. The model includes feelings of inequity, patient self-perceived burden, caregiver burden, and distress. METHODS: The HSCT patients and their spousal caregivers were recruited prior to HSCT between March 2011 and September 2012. Each member of the dyad self-administered a questionnaire package. RESULTS: Seventy-two dyads were included in the path analyses. Our model demonstrated an inadequate statistical fit; however, with one modification, an adequate to good fit was obtained: χ2 (df) = 6.01(5), normed χ2 = 1.20, standardized root mean square residual = 0.048, comparative fit index = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.96, and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05 (90% CI, 0.00-0.18). As hypothesized, pre-HSCT caregiver burden mediates the relationship between caregiver underbenefit and caregiver distress. However, patient self-perceived burden was not associated with patient distress; rather, patient perception of overbenefit was related to patient distress. In our modified model, the results demonstrate that patient overbenefit influenced caregiver burden; however, there was not a reciprocal influence, because caregiver variables did not affect patient variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed theoretical framework describes patients' and caregivers' individual experience of distress before HSCT but does not as clearly encompass the dyadic experience. Addressing perceived imbalances and providing psycho-education on role changes within HSCT dyads before transplantation may be a useful prehabilitation strategy for preventing distress.
Authors: J Tay; S Beattie; C Bredeson; R Brazauskas; N He; I A Ahmed; M Aljurf; M Askar; Y Atsuta; S Badawy; A Barata; A M Beitinjaneh; N S Bhatt; D Buchbinder; J Cerny; S Ciurea; A D'Souza; J Dalal; N Farhadfar; C O Freytes; S Ganguly; U Gergis; S Gerull; H M Lazarus; T Hahn; S Hong; Y Inamoto; N Khera; T Kindwall-Keller; R T Kamble; J M Knight; Y N Koleva; A Kumar; J Kwok; H S Murthy; R F Olsson; M Angel Diaz-Perez; D Rizzieri; S Seo; S Chhabra; H Schoemans; H C Schouten; A Steinberg; K M Sullivan; J Szer; D Szwajcer; M L Ulrickson; L F Verdonck; B Wirk; W A Wood; J A Yared; W Saber Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.677