E Gouider1,2, L Jouini2, M Achour1,2, H Elmahmoudi2, K Zahra1,2, W Saied1,3, B Meddeb1,2. 1. Hemophilia Center Aziza Othmana Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia. 2. Tunis Medical University of Tunis, UR14ES11, Tunis, Tunisia. 3. Orthopedy Department, Children Hospital Bechir Hamza, Tunis, Tunisia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Low dose prophylaxis could be recommended in countries with limited resources. AIM: We report our single centre experience in children with haemophilia. PATIENTS: Fifty-five children were included in our study with a weekly median dose of 30 UI kg-1 given once, twice or thrice a week. Age of initiation of prophylaxis is 5.32 years (0.64-11.44). Outcome assessment used were number of bleeding before and after initiating prophylaxis, haemophilia joint health score (HJHS), functional independence score in haemophilia (FISH) and quality of life with the Haemo-QoL. RESULTS: Reduction of number of bleeding was clear in all patients; HJHS, FISH and Haemo-QOL were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Low dose prophylaxis is effective and better than on-demand therapy. It should be the starting point for prophylaxis in countries with limited resources.
INTRODUCTION: Low dose prophylaxis could be recommended in countries with limited resources. AIM: We report our single centre experience in children with haemophilia. PATIENTS: Fifty-five children were included in our study with a weekly median dose of 30 UI kg-1 given once, twice or thrice a week. Age of initiation of prophylaxis is 5.32 years (0.64-11.44). Outcome assessment used were number of bleeding before and after initiating prophylaxis, haemophilia joint health score (HJHS), functional independence score in haemophilia (FISH) and quality of life with the Haemo-QoL. RESULTS: Reduction of number of bleeding was clear in all patients; HJHS, FISH and Haemo-QOL were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Low dose prophylaxis is effective and better than on-demand therapy. It should be the starting point for prophylaxis in countries with limited resources.