Literature DB >> 27943239

An 18-year retrospective study on the outcomes of keratoacanthomas with different treatment modalities at a single academic centre.

D C Tran1, S Li1, S Henry2, D J Wood2, A L S Chang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27943239      PMCID: PMC5813161          DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


× No keyword cloud information.
dear editors, The clinical course for keratoacanthomas (KAs) varies from self‐resolving to invasive cancers.1, 2 KA is often treated with surgical intervention,2, 3 but other treatments such as electrodessication and curettage,4 cryotherapy,4 topical medications,2, 5 intralesional chemotherapy,2 acitretin2 and active surveillance6 have been employed. Randomized controlled studies of different treatment modalities are lacking. The largest systematic review consisted of 113 case reports and case series (445 patients included) and reported 18 recurrent or persistent KA cases (4%),2 but this data is prone to publication bias, as unusual cases are more likely to be reported and treatment outcomes could not be directly compared. Our study examines KA recurrence and persistence rates of different treatment approaches at a single institution. After Institutional Review Board approval, we searched the Stanford Cancer Institute Research Database from January 1998 to February 2016 using the keywords ‘keratoacanthoma’, ‘crateriform’ or ‘cup‐shaped’ and applied the following two inclusion criteria: (i) at least one KA‐positive biopsy read by a Stanford dermatopathologist and (ii) at least one dermatology visit documenting treatment of KAs. After manual chart review, 261 patients (with 363 KAs) met these criteria (Fig. 1). ‘Recurrence’ was defined as regrowth of treated lesions documented as no clinically visible lesion after first treatment approach (FTA). ‘Persistence’ was defined as lesions clinically visible at the same anatomic location after FTA.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study. ED&C, electrodessication and curettage; 5‐FU, 5‐fluorouracil; IL, intralesional; Pts, patients.

Flowchart of the study. ED&C, electrodessication and curettage; 5‐FU, 5‐fluorouracil; IL, intralesional; Pts, patients. Average age at KA diagnosis was 73 years (SD 11·7). Median follow‐up time was 2·3 years (range 0–17·9). Overall resolution rate of KA was 97·2% (353 of 363 KAs) after the FTA, with 2·8% either recurring [four of 363 KAs (1·1%)] or persisting [six of 363 KAs (1·7%)]. The median size of resolved and recurring/persisting KAs was 1·0 cm (range 0·3–4·5) and 1·1 cm (range 0·4–1·6), respectively. There was no significant difference in age, sex, race and immunosuppression status between individuals with KAs that resolved after the FTA (n = 251 patients) and those whose KAs did not (n = 10 patients). Of the 21 patients who were immunosuppressed, 20 experienced KA resolution after FTA and one did not. Surgical treatment by excision or Mohs surgery led to significantly lower recurrence rates (< 1%) than nonsurgical treatments, whose recurrence or persistence rates ranged from 12·5% to 33·3% (Fig. 1). To assist with patient counselling and estimation of duration needed for monitoring KAs, time to recurrence and duration of persistence after the FTA are shown in Table 1. Median time to recurrence was 3 months (range 1·5–7·5) when all treatment modalities were considered. Median persistence time for persistent KAs prior to initiation of second treatment approach (STA) was 5 months (range 3·8–11·3). All recurrent and persistent KAs resolved after the STA, which was either Mohs surgery (n = 5) or excision (n = 5). No metastatic KA cases were found.
Table 1

Time to recurrence and duration of persistence after the first treatment approach for recurrent and persistent keratoacanthomas (KAs), respectively, at Stanford, compared with our tabulation of Savage et al. systematic review (2013)

First treatment approachNumber of KAsMonths to KA recurrenceMonths of KA persistence before initiation of second treatment
Stanford (consecutive cases)Savage et al.Stanforda Savage et al.Stanfordb Savage et al.
Mohs surgery1132NoneNone
Excision197·52 (0·5–12·0)
Electrodessication and curettage121·51·6 (0·25–3·0)
Cryotherapy10Not availableNone
IL/topical/oral medications23None3 (recurrence, n = 1)9·8 (8·2–11·3)9·75 (1·5–18) (persistence, n = 2)
Active surveillance41None4·1 (3·8–5·7)29
Total, median (range)1016c 3 (1·5–7·5)2 (0·25–12·0)5 (3·8–11·3)18 (1·5–29·0)

IL, intralesional. aCalculated from the date of the first procedure (Mohs surgery, excision or electrodessication and curettage) to the date of the recurrence. bCalculated from the date of first treatment initiation to the date of second treatment (which were either Mohs surgery or excision). cThe 2013 systematic review by Savage et al. reported 18 recurrent/persistent cases. However, upon re‐examination of individual cases, we determined that two cases (reported by Calonje et al. and Schwartz et al.) did not meet our definitions of recurrence/persistence and were thus excluded. Median and range are reported where there are more than two KA cases. All recurrent and persistent KAs reported here subsequently underwent excision or Mohs surgery with 100% resolution at follow‐up.

Time to recurrence and duration of persistence after the first treatment approach for recurrent and persistent keratoacanthomas (KAs), respectively, at Stanford, compared with our tabulation of Savage et al. systematic review (2013) IL, intralesional. aCalculated from the date of the first procedure (Mohs surgery, excision or electrodessication and curettage) to the date of the recurrence. bCalculated from the date of first treatment initiation to the date of second treatment (which were either Mohs surgery or excision). cThe 2013 systematic review by Savage et al. reported 18 recurrent/persistent cases. However, upon re‐examination of individual cases, we determined that two cases (reported by Calonje et al. and Schwartz et al.) did not meet our definitions of recurrence/persistence and were thus excluded. Median and range are reported where there are more than two KA cases. All recurrent and persistent KAs reported here subsequently underwent excision or Mohs surgery with 100% resolution at follow‐up. Median time to resolution for KAs after nonsurgical FTAs were as follows: active surveillance was 3 months (range 0·6–17, n = 23), cryotherapy was 1·4 months (range 1·2–1·7, n = 2), electrodessication and curettage was 3 months (range 1·7–5·0, n = 7) and medications (topical, intralesional or oral) was 6 months (range 1·6–12·6, n = 11). Our data provides a single‐site source of recurrence and persistence rates of KAs treated with a variety of FTAs (Fig. 1). Although direct comparison of our data with prior systematic reviews is difficult owing to differences in methodology, differences between our data and the largest systematic review2 to date are shown in Table 1. Our median persistence duration of KA after FTA [median 5 months (range 3·8–11·3), n = 6] was different from the median persistence time after FTA in the Savage et al. systematic review [18 months (range 1·5–29·0), n = 3], although the sample size was small. Savage et al. also reported that four of 16 patients required more than two treatments, while none of 261 patients at Stanford required more than two treatments. Compared with a previous study of 43 KAs treated with Mohs surgery,3 KA recurrence after Mohs surgery was threefold lower (2·4% vs. 0·8%). While the number of patients with KA treated with cryotherapy is small, our resolution rate was only 67%, lower than a prior expert opinion of 99%.4 Lastly, KAs treated with nonsurgical approaches including active surveillance can take up to 1 year to resolve. Hence, KAs persisting after 1 year would be candidates for surgical removal, although multicentre studies are needed to establish optimal duration for expectant management. Despite our retrospective study being the largest single‐site study to date, limitations include lack of multivariate analysis owing to low sample size, and nonrandomized nonblinded design.
  6 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of short contact topical 5-Fluorouracil in the treatment of keratoacanthomas: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Bobbye J Thompson; Margaret Ravits; David N Silvers
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2014-11

Review 2.  Keratoacanthoma clinical behavior: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Savage; John C Maize
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.533

Review 3.  Keratoacanthoma: a clinico-pathologic enigma.

Authors:  Robert A Schwartz
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Keratoacanthoma observed.

Authors:  Richard W Griffiths
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2004-09

5.  Evaluation of curettage and electrodesiccation in treatment of keratoacanthoma.

Authors:  J A Nedwich
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.875

6.  Keratoacanthomas treated with Mohs' micrographic surgery (chemosurgery). A review of forty-three cases.

Authors:  P O Larson
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.527

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Topical Imiquimod 5% as a Treatment Option in Solitary Facial Keratoacanthoma.

Authors:  Goran Pancevski; Senada Pepic; Sanela Idoska; Gligor Tofoski; Suzana Nikolovska
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-08

Review 2.  Soluble Factors and Receptors Involved in Skin Innate Immunity-What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  Lucian G Scurtu; Olga Simionescu
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.