Literature DB >> 27942968

False-positive Cultures After Native Knee Aspiration: True or False.

Jason M Jennings1, Douglas A Dennis2,3,4,5, Raymond H Kim1,6,7, Todd M Miner1, Charlie C Yang1, David C McNabb8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid aspiration is a routine practice used by most orthopaedic surgeons to aid in the diagnosis of joint infection. In patients for whom there is a low pretest probability of infection, a positive culture-particularly if it is a broth-only culture-may be considered a contaminant, especially if the bacterial species are skin pathogens. To our knowledge no study has evaluated the incidence of contamination of aspirations from the native knee. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: What is the frequency of false-positive cultures among knee aspirations of the native knee?
METHODS: Two hundred patients, with a total of 200 knees, with the diagnosis of degenerative osteoarthritis undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified for this study. None of these patients had symptoms, signs, or laboratory studies to suggest the presence of joint infection; a positive culture in this population therefore would be considered contaminated. Thirty-two (16%) patients were excluded secondary to a dry aspiration. One patient was enrolled in the study but did not have the knee aspirated and another patient's specimen was accidentally discarded. Each knee was aspirated under sterile conditions before performing the TKA. The fluid was sent for cell count and culture. If insufficient fluid was obtained for both cell count and culture, culture was performed rather than cell count.
RESULTS: There were no false-positive cultures (zero of 166 [0%]) in aspirations of native knees.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study would indicate that when done properly under sterile technique, cultures taken from knee arthrocentesis in patients without prosthetic joints should not be affected by perceived contaminant species. A positive specimen finding on culture should raise a strong suspicion of bacterial septic arthritis. Future studies should include more specimens as well as knees with prior TKA to help further identify the rate of false-positive cultures in knee arthrocentesis in both populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, diagnostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27942968      PMCID: PMC5449316          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5194-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  The fate of the unexpected positive intraoperative cultures after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert L Barrack; Ajay Aggarwal; R Stephen J Burnett; John C Clohisy; Elie Ghanem; Peter Sharkey; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Contamination of joints with tissue debris and hair after arthrocentesis: the effect of needle insertion angle, spinal needle gauge, and insertion of spinal needles with and without a stylet.

Authors:  Kevin Wahl; Stephen B Adams; George E Moore
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.495

3.  Determining False Positive Rates of Leukocyte Esterase Reagent Strip When Used as a Detection Tool for Joint Infection.

Authors:  David Clinton McNabb; Douglas A Dennis; Raymond H Kim; Todd M Miner; Charlie C Yang; Jason M Jennings
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Chlorhexidine provides superior skin decontamination in foot and ankle surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Christopher Bibbo; Dipak V Patel; Robin M Gehrmann; Sheldon S Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  G P Duff; P F Lachiewicz; S S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Efficacy of surgical preparation solutions in foot and ankle surgery.

Authors:  Roger V Ostrander; Michael J Botte; Michael E Brage
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty. Clinical and laboratory factors influencing attainment of a positive culture.

Authors:  P F Lachiewicz; G D Rogers; H C Thomason
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Propionibacterium acnes infections in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  John G Horneff; Jason E Hsu; G Russell Huffman
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  1 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: False-positive Cultures After Native Knee Aspiration: True or False.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.