Jürgen Götz1, Mario Lange2, Silvia Dullien2, Joachim Grifka2, Gernot Hertel2, Clemens Baier2, Franz Koeck2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Medical Centre University of Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany. Juergen.Goetz@klinik.uni-regensburg.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, Medical Centre University of Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl-V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic foot syndrome is one of the most dreaded complications in diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of different offloading devices compared to walking in barefoot condition and in normal shoes both in healthy subjects and in patients with diabetes and neuropathy. METHODS: Twenty patients with diabetes and polyneuropathy and ten healthy probands were included. Pedobarographic examination was performed in barefoot condition, with sneakers, postoperative shoes, Aircast® Diabetic Pneumatic Walker™ and VACO®diaped. In the diabetic group, a total contact cast was additionally tested. RESULTS: The most effective reduction of force was achieved by TCC (75%) and VACOdiaped (64.3%) with the VACO®diaped resulting in the most homogeneous distribution of forces all over the foot. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: A customized device like the TCC is still the most proven offloading device. However, a removable cast walker being based on vacuum pads and a cushioning sole, provides better results concerning force distribution.
INTRODUCTION:Diabetic foot syndrome is one of the most dreaded complications in diabetes mellitus. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of different offloading devices compared to walking in barefoot condition and in normal shoes both in healthy subjects and in patients with diabetes and neuropathy. METHODS: Twenty patients with diabetes and polyneuropathy and ten healthy probands were included. Pedobarographic examination was performed in barefoot condition, with sneakers, postoperative shoes, Aircast® Diabetic Pneumatic Walker™ and VACO®diaped. In the diabetic group, a total contact cast was additionally tested. RESULTS: The most effective reduction of force was achieved by TCC (75%) and VACOdiaped (64.3%) with the VACO®diaped resulting in the most homogeneous distribution of forces all over the foot. DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION: A customized device like the TCC is still the most proven offloading device. However, a removable cast walker being based on vacuum pads and a cushioning sole, provides better results concerning force distribution.
Authors: Donna Goodridge; Elly Trepman; Jeff Sloan; Lorna Guse; Laurel A Strain; John McIntyre; John M Embil Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: M H Nabuurs-Franssen; M S P Huijberts; A C Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman; J Willems; N C Schaper Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-07-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Judy K Morona; Elizabeth S Buckley; Sara Jones; Edith A Reddin; Tracy L Merlin Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: S A Bus; R W van Deursen; D G Armstrong; J E A Lewis; C F Caravaggi; P R Cavanagh Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Stephanie C Wu; Jeffrey L Jensen; Anna K Weber; Daniel E Robinson; David G Armstrong Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 17.152