Literature DB >> 27942788

Pan-European inter-laboratory studies on a panel of in vitro cytotoxicity and pro-inflammation assays for nanoparticles.

Jean-Pascal Piret1, Olesja M Bondarenko2, Matthew S P Boyles3, Martin Himly3, Ana R Ribeiro4, Federico Benetti5,6, Caroline Smal7, Braulio Lima8, Annegret Potthoff9, Monica Simion10, Elise Dumortier11, Paulo Emilio C Leite4, Luciene Bottentuit Balottin4, José Mauro Granjeiro4, Angela Ivask2,12, Anne Kahru2, Isabella Radauer-Preiml3, Ulrike Tischler3, Albert Duschl3, Christelle Saout11, Sergio Anguissola13, Andrea Haase14, An Jacobs15, Inge Nelissen15, Superb K Misra16, Olivier Toussaint17.   

Abstract

The rapid development of nanotechnologies and increased production and use of nanomaterials raise concerns about their potential toxic effects for human health and environment. To evaluate the biological effects of nanomaterials, a set of reliable and reproducible methods and development of standard operating procedures (SOPs) is required. In the framework of the European FP7 NanoValid project, three different cell viability assays (MTS, ATP content, and caspase-3/7 activity) with different readouts (absorbance, luminescence and fluorescence) and two immune assays (ELISA of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1-β and TNF-α) were evaluated by inter-laboratory comparison. The aim was to determine the suitability and reliability of these assays for nanosafety assessment. Studies on silver and copper oxide nanoparticles (NPs) were performed, and SOPs for particle handling, cell culture, and in vitro assays were established or adapted. These SOPs give precise descriptions of assay procedures, cell culture/seeding conditions, NPs/positive control preparation and dilutions, experimental well plate preparation, and evaluation of NPs interference. The following conclusions can be highlighted from the pan-European inter-laboratory studies: Testing of NPs interference with the toxicity assays should always be conducted. Interference tests should be designed as close as possible to the cell exposure conditions. ATP and MTS assays gave consistent toxicity results with low inter-laboratory variability using Ag and CuO NPs and different cell lines and therefore, could be recommended for further validation and standardization. High inter-laboratory variability was observed for Caspase 3/7 assay and ELISA for IL1-β and TNF-α measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro assays; Inter-laboratory studies; Interference; Nanoparticles; Standard operating procedures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942788     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-016-1897-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  8 in total

1.  Agglomeration of Escherichia coli with Positively Charged Nanoparticles Can Lead to Artifacts in a Standard Caenorhabditis elegans Toxicity Assay.

Authors:  Shannon K Hanna; Antonio R Montoro Bustos; Alexander W Peterson; Vytas Reipa; Leona D Scanlan; Sanem Hosbas Coskun; Tae Joon Cho; Monique E Johnson; Vincent A Hackley; Bryant C Nelson; Michael R Winchester; John T Elliott; Elijah J Petersen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a digital holographic microscopy-based assay for label-free in vitro cytotoxicity testing of polymeric nanocarriers.

Authors:  Anne Marzi; Kai Moritz Eder; Björn Kemper; Jürgen Schnekenburger; Álvaro Barroso; Ane Marit Wågbø; Ýrr Mørch; Anne Rein Hatletveit; Torkild Visnes; Ruth B Schmid; Geir Klinkenberg
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.671

3.  Targeted drug delivery strategies for precision medicines.

Authors:  Mandana T Manzari; Yosi Shamay; Hiroto Kiguchi; Neal Rosen; Maurizio Scaltriti; Daniel A Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 66.308

4.  Surface carboxylation or PEGylation decreases CuO nanoparticles' cytotoxicity to human cells in vitro without compromising their antibacterial properties.

Authors:  Anna-Liisa Kubo; Grigory Vasiliev; Heiki Vija; Jekaterina Krishtal; Vello Tõugu; Meeri Visnapuu; Vambola Kisand; Anne Kahru; Olesja M Bondarenko
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Assessing the bioactivity of crystalline silica in heated high-temperature insulation wools.

Authors:  Matthew S P Boyles; David Brown; Jilly Knox; Michael Horobin; Mark R Miller; Helinor J Johnston; Vicki Stone
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Label-Free Digital Holographic Microscopy for In Vitro Cytotoxic Effect Quantification of Organic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kai Moritz Eder; Anne Marzi; Álvaro Barroso; Steffi Ketelhut; Björn Kemper; Jürgen Schnekenburger
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Standardization of an in vitro assay matrix to assess cytotoxicity of organic nanocarriers: a pilot interlaboratory comparison.

Authors:  Kai Moritz Eder; Anne Marzi; Ane Marit Wågbø; Jolanda P Vermeulen; Liset J J de la Fonteyne-Blankestijn; Matthias Rösslein; Rainer Ossig; Geir Klinkenberg; Rob J Vandebriel; Jürgen Schnekenburger
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.671

8.  Pre-validation of a reporter gene assay for oxidative stress for the rapid screening of nanobiomaterials.

Authors:  Sebastin Martin; Laura de Haan; Ignacio Miro Estruch; Kai Moritz Eder; Anne Marzi; Jürgen Schnekenburger; Magda Blosi; Anna Costa; Giulia Antonello; Enrico Bergamaschi; Chiara Riganti; David Beal; Marie Carrière; Olivier Taché; Gary Hutchison; Eva Malone; Lesley Young; Luisa Campagnolo; Fabio La Civita; Antonio Pietroiusti; Stéphanie Devineau; Armelle Baeza; Sonja Boland; Cai Zong; Gaku Ichihara; Bengt Fadeel; Hans Bouwmeester
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.