Literature DB >> 27942510

Is clinical evaluation alone sufficient for the diagnosis of a Bankart lesion without the use of magnetic resonance imaging?

Bryan Loh1, Jason Beng Teck Lim1, Andrew Hwee Chye Tan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) offer great utility in diagnosing Bankart lesions but they are associated with a high degree of intra and interobserver variability. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation and imaging modalities in Bankart lesions such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRA of the shoulder.
METHODS: Between February 2004 to January 2015, a retrospectively review of the surgical records at a tertiary hospital identified a total of 250 patients treated with a shoulder arthroscopy for Bankart repair. All patients were thoroughly investigated preoperatively in which a detailed history were obtained, relevant physical examinations were performed (Load and Shift/Anterior Apprehension test) and pre-operative radiographs taken. Some patients subsequently underwent either an MRI or an MRA scan if the initial clinical evaluation was equivocal.
RESULTS: Anterior Shoulder Apprehension test and the Load and Shift test identified 214 of 227 Bankart tears, with a sensitivity of 94% [95% confidence interval (CI), 90-97%]. MRI correctly identified 23 of 26 Bankart tears, with a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI, 70-98%). Out of the five superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears identified on MRI, only three were confirmed during arthroscopic surgery. MRA correctly identified 84 of 89 Bankart tears, for a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI, 87-98%).
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we report that clinical evaluation with focused history-taking and anterior apprehension, load and shift clinical examination can diagnose anterior shoulder instability as reliably as MR imaging. For patients with equivocal clinical findings, MR imaging can aid in the diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bankart; Clinical examination; dislocation; imaging; shoulder

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942510      PMCID: PMC5124608          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  23 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance arthrography of the labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: an update.

Authors:  W C G Peh
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singap       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.473

2.  Glenoid labrum: evaluation with MR imaging.

Authors:  R A Garneau; D L Renfrew; T E Moore; G Y el-Khoury; J V Nepola; J H Lemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Mechanics of glenohumeral instability.

Authors:  F A Matsen; D T Harryman; J A Sidles
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Pathoanatomy of first-time, traumatic, anterior glenohumeral subluxation events.

Authors:  Brett D Owens; Bradley J Nelson; Michele L Duffey; Sally B Mountcastle; Dean C Taylor; Kenneth L Cameron; Scot Campbell; Thomas M DeBerardino
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  B Flannigan; S Kursunoglu-Brahme; S Snyder; R Karzel; W Del Pizzo; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Complications of arthrography.

Authors:  A H Newberg; C S Munn; A H Robbins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  An evaluation of the apprehension, relocation, and surprise tests for anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Ian K Y Lo; Blake Nonweiler; Michael Woolfrey; Robert Litchfield; Alexandra Kirkley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Diagnostic value of US, MR and MR arthrography in shoulder instability.

Authors:  Roman Pavic; Petra Margetic; Mirta Bensic; Renata Letica Brnadic
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of history and physical examination for diagnosing glenoid labral tears.

Authors:  Matthew K Walsworth; William C Doukas; Kevin P Murphy; Billie J Mielcarek; Lori A Michener
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Is MRA an unnecessary expense in the management of a clinically unstable shoulder? A comparison of MRA and arthroscopic findings in 90 patients.

Authors:  Sam C Jonas; Michael J Walton; Partha P Sarangi
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Epidemiology and Natural History of Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Joseph W Galvin; Justin J Ernat; Brian R Waterman; Monica J Stadecker; Stephen A Parada
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

2.  Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the simple method of computed tomography in the assessment of patients with shoulder instability: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tingting Liu; Jianpeng Ma; Hetao Cao; Dongmei Hou; Lin Xu
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Reliability of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in patients with sports-related shoulder injuries.

Authors:  Georg J Wengert; Marc Schmutzer; Hubert Bickel; Mircea-Constantin Sora; Stephan H Polanec; Micheal Weber; Claudia Schueller-Weidekamm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology.

Authors:  Aarthi Thiagarajan; Raghu Nagaraj; Kiran Marathe
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.