| Literature DB >> 27941978 |
Yan Huang1, Wen Tang2, Yi Mu2, Xiaohong Li2, Zheng Liu2, Yanping Wang2, Mingrong Li2, Qi Li2, Li Dai2, Juan Liang2, Jun Zhu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of a population-based sex ratio at birth (SRB) in China has long been questioned. To depict a more accurate profile, the present study used data from a national surveillance system for health facility births to explore the characteristics of SRB in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941978 PMCID: PMC5152891 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Time trends and geographical variations of SRB in China (2012 to 2015).
| Number of live births | Female | Male | SRB | Adjusted SRB* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |||||
| 1318173 (24.69%) | 625943 | 47.49 | 691570 | 52.46 | 110.48 | 111.04 | ||
| 1286906 (24.10%) | 614090 | 47.72 | 672065 | 52.22 | 109.44 | 110.16 | ||
| 1465833 (27.46%) | 703510 | 47.99 | 760630 | 51.89 | 108.12 | 108.79 | ||
| 1267941 (23.75%) | 605726 | 47.77 | 661248 | 52.15 | 109.17 | 109.53 | ||
| 1564536 (29.30%) | 743910 | 47.55 | 817836 | 52.27 | 109.94 | 110.67 | ||
| 2121681 (39.74%) | 1010287 | 47.62 | 1110657 | 52.35 | 109.93 | 109.91 | ||
| 1652636 (30.95%) | 795072 | 48.11 | 857020 | 51.86 | 107.79 | 108.85 | ||
| 588403 (11.02%) | 274971 | 46.73 | 313329 | 53.25 | 113.95 | 113.95 | ||
| 976133 (18.28%) | 468939 | 48.04 | 504507 | 51.68 | 107.58 | 107.58 | ||
| 1060638 (19.87%) | 505365 | 47.65 | 555126 | 52.34 | 109.85 | 109.85 | ||
| 1061043 (19.87%) | 504922 | 47.59 | 555531 | 52.36 | 110.02 | 110.02 | ||
| 658306 (12.33%) | 312719 | 47.50 | 345476 | 52.48 | 110.47 | 110.47 | ||
| 994330 (18.62%) | 482353 | 48.51 | 511544 | 51.45 | 106.05 | 106.05 | ||
| 5338853 (100.00%) | 2549269 | 47.75 | 2785513 | 52.17 | 109.27 | 109.86 | ||
The sociodemographic characteristics of SRBs in China (2012 to 2015).
| Number of live births | Female | Male | SRB | Adjusted SRB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |||||
| 79606 (1.49%) | 38111 | 47.87 | 41431 | 52.05 | 108.71 | 109.01 | ||
| 5258078 (98.49%) | 2510658 | 47.75 | 2743429 | 52.18 | 109.27 | 109.87 | ||
| 1169 (0.02%) | 500 | 42.77 | 653 | 55.86 | 130.60 | 127.53 | ||
| 123992 (2.32%) | 60163 | 48.52 | 63761 | 51.42 | 105.98 | 105.69 | ||
| 1095844 (20.53%) | 527942 | 48.18 | 567362 | 51.77 | 107.47 | 107.48 | ||
| 2201678 (41.24%) | 1053697 | 47.86 | 1146392 | 52.07 | 108.80 | 109.70 | ||
| 1199312 (22.46%) | 567476 | 47.32 | 630717 | 52.59 | 111.14 | 112.29 | ||
| 416138 (7.79%) | 195794 | 47.05 | 219873 | 52.84 | 112.30 | 113.11 | ||
| 102157 (1.91%) | 47941 | 46.93 | 54100 | 52.96 | 112.85 | 113.23 | ||
| 199732 (3.74%) | 96256 | 48.19 | 103308 | 51.72 | 107.33 | 108.00 | ||
| 1661627 (31.12%) | 807544 | 48.60 | 852377 | 51.30 | 105.55 | 105.98 | ||
| 1422386 (26.64%) | 678632 | 47.71 | 742422 | 52.20 | 109.40 | 109.86 | ||
| 1906370 (35.71%) | 898666 | 47.14 | 1006992 | 52.82 | 112.05 | 111.98 | ||
| 193821 (3.63%) | 91139 | 47.02 | 102579 | 52.92 | 112.55 | 112.35 | ||
| 30646 (0.57%) | 14541 | 47.45 | 16081 | 52.47 | 110.59 | 111.44 | ||
| 124003 (2.32%) | 58747 | 47.38 | 65062 | 52.47 | 110.75 | 109.98 | ||
| 2313376 (43.33%) | 1133095 | 48.98 | 1178372 | 50.94 | 104.00 | 104.30 | ||
| 1603104 (30.03%) | 761566 | 47.51 | 840419 | 52.42 | 110.35 | 111.06 | ||
| 1419916 (26.60%) | 653440 | 46.02 | 765444 | 53.91 | 117.14 | 117.99 | ||
| 2457 (0.05%) | 1168 | 47.54 | 1278 | 52.01 | 109.42 | 107.12 | ||
| 3309593 (61.99%) | 1620256 | 48.96 | 1686593 | 50.96 | 104.09 | 104.35 | ||
| 1720786 (32.33%) | 799564 | 46.47 | 920197 | 53.48 | 115.09 | 115.20 | ||
| 280948 (5.26%) | 115907 | 41.26 | 164823 | 58.67 | 142.20 | 141.76 | ||
| 31161 (0.58%) | 15204 | 48.79 | 15866 | 50.92 | 104.35 | 104.53 | ||
| 5338853 (100.00%) | 2549269 | 47.75 | 2785513 | 52.17 | 109.27 | 109.86 | ||
*Adjusted for sampling distribution of population.
The SRB in each order of pregnancy and parity in China (2012–2015).
| Variables | Parity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ≥3 | |||
| 104.94 | - | - | |||
| 105.10 | 119.74 | - | |||
| 104.35 | 116.56 | 151.38 | |||
| 104.01 | - | - | |||
| 104.12 | 115.71 | - | |||
| 106.60 | 113.44 | 150.82 | |||
| 103.98 | - | - | |||
| 103.24 | 112.25 | - | |||
| 103.75 | 113.84 | 128.55 | |||
| 103.69 | - | - | |||
| 105.20 | 115.69 | - | |||
| 103.89 | 114.32 | 146.62 | |||
| 106.57 | - | - | |||
| 104.94 | 122.09 | - | |||
| 105.09 | 118.34 | 153.48 | |||
| 105.16 | - | - | |||
| 105.09 | 118.32 | - | |||
| 106.19 | 118.07 | 162.08 | |||
| 103.32 | - | - | |||
| 103.12 | 115.09 | - | |||
| 107.17 | 110.99 | 147.86 | |||
| 101.24 | - | - | |||
| 102.34 | 111.83 | - | |||
| 102.97 | 112.61 | 132.37 | |||
| 105.73 | - | - | |||
| 104.17 | 112.36 | - | |||
| 104.88 | 114.59 | 127.48 | |||
| 104.32 | - | - | |||
| 104.21 | 115.72 | - | |||
| 104.90 | 114.58 | 141.76 | |||
All SRBs were adjusted for the sampling distribution of the population.
Association between the number of pregnancy and parity and SRBs in China (2012–2015).
| Parity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | ≥3 | ||
| 1 | 1 | - | - | |
| 2 | 0.99 (0.99,1.01) | 1.11 (1.10,1.13) | - | |
| ≥3 | 1.01 (0.99,1.02) | 1.10 (1.09,1.11) | 1.36 (1.32,1.40) | |
| 1 | 1 | - | - | |
| 2 | 1.00 (0.99,1.01) | 1.12 (1.10,1.13) | - | |
| ≥3 | 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 1.11 (1.10,1.12) | 1.39 (1.34,1.43) | |
* Adjusted for the sampling distribution of the population
†Adjusted for clustering of births within hospitals.
‡Adjusted for factors including area, maternal education and mother’s age.