| Literature DB >> 27941956 |
Luciana Principal Antunes1, Layla Farage Martins1, Roberta Verciano Pereira1, Andrew Maltez Thomas1,2, Deibs Barbosa1,2, Leandro Nascimento Lemos1,2, Gianluca Major Machado Silva1,2, Livia Maria Silva Moura1,2, George Willian Condomitti Epamino1,2, Luciano Antonio Digiampietri3, Karen Cristina Lombardi1, Patricia Locosque Ramos4, Ronaldo Bento Quaggio1, Julio Cezar Franco de Oliveira5, Renata Castiglioni Pascon5, João Batista da Cruz4, Aline Maria da Silva1,2, João Carlos Setubal1,2,6.
Abstract
class="Species">Composting is a class="Chemical">promising source of new organisms and thermostable enzymes that may be helclass="Chemical">pful in environmentEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941956 PMCID: PMC5150989 DOI: 10.1038/srep38915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Description of samples collected from ZC4 composting cell.
| Day of collection | Sample ID Collection Date | Average Temperature | Δ Temperature | pH | Moisture (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D01 08/06/2013 | 66.2 ± 7.5 | 18 | 6.0 | 71.0 |
| 3 | D03 08/08/2013 | 68.4 ± 2.6 | 6 | 5.5 | 67.0 |
| 7 | D07 08/12/2013 | 70.8 ± 3.5 | 9 | 6.4 | 70.3 |
| 15 | D15 08/20/2013 | 68.2 ± 5.8 | 14 | 6.9 | 63.8 |
| 30 | D30 09/04/2013 | 69.5 ± 2.3 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 61.8 |
| 64 | D64 10/08/2013 | 57.9 ± 8.9 | 21.2 | 6.8 | 60.7 |
| 67 | D67 10/11/2013 | 70.5 ± 4.8 | 10.7 | 7.4 | n.d. |
| 78 | D78 10/22/2013 | 61.2 ± 3.2 | 8.0 | 7.8 | 58.6 |
| 99 | D99 11/12/2013 | 47.8 ± 3.3 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 58.7 |
aMean plus standard deviation of temperature measurements taken at the four edges and in the center of the composting pile.
bVariation between lower and higher temperature measurements. n.d., not determined.
*Turning was performed on day 63.
Figure 1Relative abundance of bacteria in ZC4 samples at the order level.
Taxonomic assignments were obtained from 16S rRNA amplicon (A) and shotgun (S) sequencing datasets using RDP classifier and MG-RAST (M5NR) database, respectively. Only orders with relative abundance ≥2% are shown. Unassigned 16S (10–30%) and DNA shotgun reads (10.1–14.6%) were excluded. Samples are referred to by the letter D followed by the collection day. Asterisk indicates one day after the turning procedure.
Figure 2ZC4 phylogenetic diversity variation.
Profile of the number of OTUs estimated by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and phylogenetic diversity index (alpha rarefaction) during ZC4 composting. Intervals on the horizontal axis do not represent chronological time. Samples are referred to by the letter D followed by the collection day.
Figure 3Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on nucleotide sequences of 113 ortholog genes.
Node numbers represent bootstrap support. Scale is number of substitutions per site. Thermaerobacter marianensis (clostridiales) was chosen as outgroup; all other species are members of the Bacillaceae family.
Figure 4Functional profile of the metatranscriptomes based on COG categories.
(a) Hierarchical clustering of metatranscriptome CDSs. The tree was generated using an IMG/M tool, selecting the COG pathways method. Samples are referred to by the letter D followed by the collection day. (b) Number of COGs (y axis) of each COG functional category (x axis) that had differential representation, based on relative abundance of CDSs. A COG functional category was considered differentially represented if the relative abundance value for a given sample was at least 1.5 times the interquartile range for the third quartile (i.e., only overrepresented outliers were noted) considering relative abundance values for that category in all samples. Each histogram corresponds to the same-color group of samples to its left.
Figure 5Analysis of CDSs involved in lignocellulosic degradation during ZC4 composting process.
Relative abundance (%) of the CDSs annotated as hemicellulases, cellulases, ligninases and pectinases in the metatranscriptome contigs throughout the composting process, according to the IMG-M pipeline. Samples are referred to by the letter D followed by the collection day. Intervals on the horizontal axis do not represent chronological time.
Figure 6Taxonomic profile of the ZC4 metatranscriptome.
Columns labeled by A show taxonomic profiles considering all CDSs annotated with COGs. Columns labeled by B show taxonomic profiles considering CDSs annotated with COGs related to plant biomass (lignocellulose and pectin) degradation. The CDSs were classified with program myTaxa. Samples are referred to by the letter D followed by the collection day. The asterisk indicates one day after the turning procedure.
Figure 7Molecular overview of a thermophilic composting operation.
The top panel shows the three stages identified in this work: start (D01, D03 and D64), middle (D07, D15 and D30), and end (D78 and D99). The box for each stage shows the microbiota composition at the order level. The relative abundance of microorganisms is roughly proportional to the font size, and only orders with relative abundance ≥2.5% are shown. The middle panel depicts the degradation process, with vertical correspondence to the stages shown in the top panel. The bottom panel shows relative abundance of COG functions associated to lignocellulolytic enzymes, also with vertical correspondence to the stages shown in the top panel. The results in this figure were based on ZC4 metatranscriptomes.