| Literature DB >> 27941799 |
Ajinkya Revandkar1,2, Maria Luna Perciato1, Alberto Toso1, Abdullah Alajati1, Jingjing Chen1,2, Hermeto Gerber3,4,5, Mitko Dimitrov3, Andrea Rinaldi1, Nicolas Delaleu6, Emiliano Pasquini1, Rocco D'Antuono7, Sandra Pinton1, Marco Losa1, Letizia Gnetti8, Alberto Arribas1, Patrick Fraering3,4,5, Francesco Bertoni1, Alain Nepveu9, Andrea Alimonti1,2.
Abstract
Activation of NOTCH signalling is associated with advanced prostate cancer and treatment resistance in prostate cancer patients. However, the mechanism that drives NOTCH activation in prostate cancer remains still elusive. Moreover, preclinical evidence of the therapeutic efficacy of NOTCH inhibitors in prostate cancer is lacking. Here, we provide evidence that PTEN loss in prostate tumours upregulates the expression of ADAM17, thereby activating NOTCH signalling. Using prostate conditional inactivation of both Pten and Notch1 along with preclinical trials carried out in Pten-null prostate conditional mouse models, we demonstrate that Pten-deficient prostate tumours are addicted to the NOTCH signalling. Importantly, we find that pharmacological inhibition of γ-secretase promotes growth arrest in both Pten-null and Pten/Trp53-null prostate tumours by triggering cellular senescence. Altogether, our findings describe a novel pro-tumorigenic network that links PTEN loss to ADAM17 and NOTCH signalling, thus providing the rational for the use of γ-secretase inhibitors in advanced prostate cancer patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941799 PMCID: PMC5159884 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Notch1 signalling is activated in Ptenpc−/− prostate tumours.
(a) IHC showing NICD1 and Pten stainings in both Ptenpc+/+ normal prostate (8±3%) and Ptenpc−/− prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions resected from 12-week-old mice (25±9%) (n=3). Magnification × 20 and × 400. (b) WB showing the protein levels of Pten, total Notch1, NICD1 and Hes1 in both Ptenpc+/+ prostate and Ptenpc−/− prostate tumours (n=5). (c) Quantification of b. (d) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showing activation of Notch1 signalling in Ptenpc−/− prostate tumours. (e) H&E and Ki-67 staining of APs derived from 12-week-old Ptenpc−/− and Ptenpc−/−; Notch1pc−/− tumours (n=5). Magnification × 20 and × 40, respectively. Insets represent H&E and Ki-67 images of Ptenpc+/+ and Notch1pc−/−. (f) Histopathological characterization of normal prostates and prostate tumours in mice of the indicated genotypes (n=16 for each genotype). (g) Quantification of Ki-67 staining of APs in mice of indicated genotypes. (h) WB showing the protein levels of Pten and p27 in Ptenpc+/+, Ptenpc−/− and Ptenpc−/−; Notch1pc−/− prostate tumours. (i) Quantification of the percentage of Senescence-associated beta-galactosidase staining in Ptenpc+/+, Ptenpc−/− and Ptenpc−/−; Notch1pc−/− prostate tumours. Values are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 by Student's t-test.
Figure 2PF-03084014 constrains tumorigenesis of Ptenpc−/− prostate tumours.
(a) Scheme of treatment. Mice have been treated twice a day for 4 weeks with either vehicle or PF-03084014 (100 mg kg−1). (b) Picture showing the size of anterior (AP), dorso-lateral (DLP) and ventral prostates (VP) from Ptenpc+/+ wt prostates and Ptenpc−/− tumours treated with either vehicle or PF-03084014. (c) Quantification of b (n=5). (d) H&E, Ki-67 and pHP1γ staining of APs derived from Ptenpc−/− tumours treated with either vehicle or PF-03084014. Magnification × 4 and × 40. (e,f) Quantification of d (n=5). (g) WB on AP extracts Ptenpc−/− tumours showing the effect of PF-03084014 on Notch1 signalling. (h) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) showing reduced Notch1 signalling in Ptenpc−/− prostate tumours treated with PF-03084014. Values are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 by Student's t-test.
Figure 3Anti-tumour activity of PF-03084014 in Ptenpc−/−;Trp53pc−/− prostate tumours.
(a) Representative H&E, Ki-67 and Vimentin/E-Cadherin immunofluorescence stainings of Ptenpc−/−; Trp53pc−/− prostate tumours treated with either vehicle or PF-03084014. White arrow shows an invasive area of epithelial tumour cells infiltrating the tumour stroma. Insets represent H&E, Ki-67 and Vimentin/E-Cadherin staining in Trp53pc−/− normal prostates treated with either vehicle or PF-03084014. (b) WB on AP extracts from Ptenpc−/−; Trp53pc−/− tumours showing the effect of PF-03084014 on Notch1 signalling. (c) Quantification of b. (d) p27 staining in Ptenpc−/−; Trp53pc−/− tumours treated with vehicle and PF-03084014. Values are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05; **P<0.01 by Student's t-test.
Figure 4ADAM17 is upregulated in PCa.
(a) WB showing the protein levels of Adam17 in Ptenpc−/− tumours compared with Ptenpc+/+ WT prostates. (b) Quantification of a (n=3). (c) Adam17 and Pten mRNA levels in both Ptenpc+/+ prostates and Ptenpc−/− tumours. (d) WB showing the protein levels of ADAM17, NICD and PTEN in different PCa cell lines. (e) Quantification of ADAM17 of d. (f) ADAM17 mRNA levels in different PCa cell lines. (g) ADAM17 and PTEN staining on human prostate cancer tissue microarray (TMA). Table showing correlation between ADAM17 and PTEN staining quantification. Data of two different TMA were combined (total no. of samples=130). (h) Inverse correlation between the mRNA levels of PTEN and ADAM17 in human prostate cancers. (i) Bar graphs representing the correlation of ADAM17 and PTEN levels with tumour grade and Gleason score. (j) WB for ADAM17 and NICD1 in PC3 cells infected with either an shRNA control or shADAM17. (k) Growth curve of PC3 cells infected with either an shRNA control or shADAM17. Values are expressed as mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 by Student's t-test.
Figure 5CUX1 regulates ADAM17 expression in prostate tumour.
(a) Schematic representation of the full-length CUX1 (p200 CUX1) and its oncogenic isoform (p110 CUX1). WB for p200 Cux1, p110 Cux1, Pten and CathepsinL in both Ptenpc+/+ prostates and Ptenpc−/− tumours. (b) Quantification of a (n=3–5). (c) WB showing the levels of Cux1, CathepsinL and Pten in both Pten and Pten− MEFs. (d) IF images showing the localization of Cux1 in both Pten and Pten− MEFs. (e) Schematic representation of ADAM17. The blue dots indicate the CUX1 predicted binding sites. In green the region where the primers used for the ChIP experiments have been designed. (f) CUX1 and PTEN in different PCa cell lines. (g) CUX1 ChIP. Graph showing the fold enrichment of ADAM17 and PIK3IP1 (CUX1 target) genes in PC3 cells. (h) mRNA levels and WB for CUX1 and ADAM17 in PC3 cells. (i) ADAM17 luciferase activity upon knockdown of CUX1. Values are expressed as mean±s.e.m. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 by Student's t-test.