| Literature DB >> 27941614 |
Chen-Guang Yang1,2,3, Mou-Hua Wang4, Ming-Xing Zhang5, Xiao-Hu Li6, Hong-Long Wang7, Zhe Xing8, Lin-Feng Ye9, Guo-Zhong Wu10,11.
Abstract
Since the maximum foaming temperature window is only about 4 °C for supercritical CO₂ (scCO₂) foaming of pristine polypropylene, it is important to raise the melt strength of polypropylene in order to more easily achieve scCO₂ foaming. In this work, radiation cross-linked isotactic polypropylene, assisted by the addition of a polyfunctional monomer (triallylisocyanurate, TAIC), was employed in the scCO₂ foaming process in order to understand the benefits of radiation cross-linking. Due to significantly enhanced melt strength and the decreased degree of crystallinity caused by cross-linking, the scCO₂ foaming behavior of polypropylene was dramatically changed. The cell size distribution, cell diameter, cell density, volume expansion ratio, and foaming rate of radiation-cross-linked polypropylene under different foaming conditions were analyzed and compared. It was found that radiation cross-linking favors the foamability and formation of well-defined cell structures. The optimal absorbed dose with the addition of 2 wt % TAIC was 30 kGy. Additionally, the foaming temperature window was expanded to about 8 °C, making the handling of scCO₂ foaming of isotactic polypropylene much easier.Entities:
Keywords: TAIC; foaming; polypropylene; radiation cross-linking; supercritical carbon dioxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27941614 PMCID: PMC6273630 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21121660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of absorbed dose on the pristine PP and PP/TAIC (the amount of TAIC was 2 wt %) blends: (a) gel content and (b) melt flow index.
Melting point (Tm) and degree of crystallinity (Xc) of pristine polypropylene (PP) and PP with the addition of triallylisocyanurate (PP/TAIC) irradiated at different doses.
| Dose (kGy) | Pristine PP | PP/TAIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xc (%) | Tm (°C) | Xc (%) | Tm (°C) | |
| 0 | 58.1 | 169.1 | 61.8 | 171.0 |
| 10 | 49.7 | 166.7 | 41.5 | 168.4 |
| 20 | 43.5 | 164.9 | 41.2 | 167.5 |
| 30 | 42.6 | 164.9 | 34.9 | 166.7 |
| 40 | 46.6 | 164.2 | 32.4 | 165.1 |
| 50 | 41.8 | 163.5 | 33.7 | 164.0 |
Figure 2Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of the melting transition of PP samples at different doses: (a) pristine PP and (b) PP/TAIC (2 wt %).
Figure 3Amplitude oscillatory shear rheological properties at different doses: (a) pristine PP and (b) PP/TAIC (2 wt %).
Figure 4SEM micrographs for PP/TAIC (2 wt %) blend foams produced at 152 °C and 20 MPa and at different doses (kGy): (a) 0; (b) 10; (c) 20; (d) 30; (e) 40; and (f) 50.
Figure 5Effect of absorbed dose (a) on the cell size distribution and (b) on the cell diameter and cell density of the PP/TAIC foams produced at the same conditions in Figure 4.
Figure 6SEM micrographs for the foaming of PP (without TAIC) irradiated at different doses (kGy): (a) 10; (b) 20; (c) 30; and (d) 40.
Figure 7Dose dependence of (a) volume expansion ratio (Rv) and (b) foaming rate (Ra) for pristine PP and PP/TAIC (2 wt %) foams prepared at 152 °C and 20 MPa.
Figure 8Effect of the foaming temperature on the cell morphology of the PP/TAIC (2 wt %) at 20 MPa (30 kGy). Foaming temperature: (a) 146 °C; (b) 148 °C; (c) 150 °C; (d) 152 °C; (e) 154 °C; and (f) 156 °C.
Figure 9SEM micrographs for two foaming specimens of foamed PP, prepared at 152 °C and 20 MPa: (a) non-cross-linked and (b) cross-linked (30 kGy).
Figure 10Preparation of microcellular PP foam using the supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) method.