Literature DB >> 27941329

Advantages of Early Preventive Ileostomy Closure after Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Institutional Retrospective Study of 123 Consecutive Patients.

Min-Wei Zhou1, Zi-Hao Wang, Zong-You Chen, Jian-Bin Xiang, Xiao-Dong Gu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Preventive ileostomy is frequently constructed to minimizethe consequences of anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. There is no consensus regarding the best timing for temporary stoma closure after proctectomy for rectal cancer. This retrospective study sought to determine whether the timing of stoma closure influenced postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: Subjects were 123 patients with rectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic or open total mesorectal excision surgery with preventive ileostomy from 2012 to 2015. They were divided into 2 groups according the timing of stoma closure: the standard group who had closure within 90 (60-120) days (n = 78) and the late group who had closure after 180 (150-210) days (n = 45).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in operative time, operative blood loss or postoperative complications between the 2 groups. Timing of postoperative fasting and length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not a risk factor for postoperative complications after stoma closure.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between different timings of temporary stoma closure in relation to postoperative complications. Delayed stoma closure showed no benefit in prevention of morbidity. Early closure is safe and can provide better quality of life for patients.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preventive stoma; Rectal cancer; Stoma closure; Temporary stoma; Total mesorectal excision

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27941329     DOI: 10.1159/000452676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  6 in total

1.  Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Garfinkle; Paul Savage; Marylise Boutros; Tara Landry; Pauline Reynier; Nancy Morin; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Risk factors for postoperative ileus following loop ileostomy closure.

Authors:  Aydın Aktaş; Cüneyt Kayaalp; Mustafa Ateş; Abuzer Dirican
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure According to Timing During Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Yoo Jin Choi; Jung-Myun Kwak; Neul Ha; Tae Hoon Lee; Se Jin Baek; Jin Kim; Seon Hahn Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-31

4.  Diverting Ileostomy Duration Is the Main Determinant of Ileostomy-Related Complications after Surgical Treatment of Rectum Cancer.

Authors:  Nadir Adnan Hacim; Ahmet Akbas; Serhat Meric; Yüksel Altinel; Onder Karabay; Erkan Yavuz
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.375

5.  Defunctioning ileostomy and mechanical bowel preparation may contribute to development of low anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Michał M Nowakowski; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Natalia Gajewska; Grzegorz Torbicz; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Małczak; Piotr Major; Mateusz Wierdak; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Investigating Risk Factors for Complications after Ileostomy Reversal in Low Anterior Rectal Resection Patients: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Jan Witowski; Michał Wysocki; Magdalena Pisarska; Stanisław Kłęk; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.