Literature DB >> 27941116

Greater Coronary Heart Disease Risk With Lower Intensity and Longer Duration Smoking Compared With Higher Intensity and Shorter Duration Smoking: Congruent Results Across Diverse Cohorts.

Jay H Lubin1, Demetrius Albanes2, Jane A Hoppin3, Honglei Chen4, Catherine C Lerro5, Stephanie J Weinstein2, Dale P Sandler4, Laura E Beane Freeman5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Relative risks (RRs) for coronary heart disease (CHD) by cigarettes/day exhibit a concave pattern, implying the RR increase with each additional cigarette/day consumed decreases with greater intensity. Interpreting this pattern faces limitations, since cigarettes/day alone does not fully characterize smoking-related exposure. A more complete understanding of smoking and CHD risk requires a more comprehensive representation of smoking.
METHODS: Using Poisson regression, we applied a RR model in pack-years and cigarettes/day to analyze two diverse cohorts, the US Agricultural Health Study, with 4396 CHD events and 1 425 976 person-years of follow-up, and the Finnish Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, with 5979 CHD events and 486 643 person-years.
RESULTS: In both cohorts, the concave RR pattern with cigarettes/day was consistent with cigarettes/day modifying a linear RR association for CHD by pack-years within categories of cigarettes/day, indicating that strength of the pack-years association depended on cigarettes/day (p < .01). For example, at 50 pack-years (365 000 total cigarettes), estimated RRs of CHD were 2.1 for accrual at 20 cigarettes/day and 1.5 for accrual at 50 cigarettes/day.
CONCLUSIONS: RRs for CHD increased with pack-years with smoking intensities affecting the strength of association. For equal pack-years, smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration. We have now observed inverse smoking intensity effects in multiple cohorts with differing smoking patterns and other characteristics, suggesting a common underlying phenomenon. IMPLICATIONS: Risk of CHD increases with pack-years of smoking, but accrual intensity strongly influences the strength of the association, such that smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration is more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration. This observation offers clues to better understanding biological mechanisms, and reinforces the importance of cessation rather than smoking less to reduce CHD risk. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27941116      PMCID: PMC5896542          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  35 in total

1.  Changes in nicotine intake and cigarette use over time in two nationally representative cross-sectional samples of smokers.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Gary A Giovino; Lynn T Kozlowski; Saul Shiffman; Andrew Hyland; John T Bernert; Ralph S Caraballo; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Invited commentary: is it time to retire the "pack-years" variable? Maybe not!

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Measurement of self reported active exposure to cigarette smoke.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Differences in the urinary metabolites of the tobacco-specific lung carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in black and white smokers.

Authors:  J P Richie; S G Carmella; J E Muscat; D G Scott; S A Akerkar; S S Hecht
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  The dose-response relationship between cigarette consumption, biochemical markers and risk of lung cancer.

Authors:  M R Law; J K Morris; H C Watt; N J Wald
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Air pollution combustion emissions: characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects.

Authors:  Joellen Lewtas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Environmental tobacco smoke and ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Malcolm R Law; Nicholas J Wald
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

9.  That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4.

Authors:  J Peto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Active and passive smoking and the risk of myocardial infarction in 24,968 men and women during 11 year of follow-up: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Birgitte Iversen; Bjarne K Jacobsen; Maja-Lisa Løchen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Smoking on Coronary Artery Plaques in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evaluation With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Yu Jiang; Tong Pang; Rui Shi; Wen-Lei Qian; Wei-Feng Yan; Yuan Li; Zhi-Gang Yang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 5.555

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.