Literature DB >> 2794097

Do volunteer subjects bias clinical trials?

G Amori1, R H Lenox.   

Abstract

The availability of volunteers for research on antidepressant medications raises questions about similarities between symptomatic volunteers and clinic patients. Volunteers accepted for a depression study and patients with major depressive disorder have been shown to have some similarities with regard to depressive symptoms and responses to treatment. However, it is unknown whether the population from which volunteers are drawn differs from the patient population in other ways that affect the generalizability of research findings. Respondents to newspaper advertisements for symptomatic volunteers and new clinic patients at a university-based, outpatient psychiatric facility received the Beck Depression Inventory, the Millon Behavioral Health Inventory and a questionnaire developed for the study. The first 30 respondents in each group with a Beck Depression Inventory score of at least 10 constituted the sample. No significant differences (p less than 0.05) between the groups were found on demographics, coping styles with help givers, perceptions of psychosocial stress, or overall depression severity. However, volunteers were sadder, more discouraged, and less interested in others than clinic patients. Symptomatic volunteers also more frequently reported financial concerns as an important factor in the decision about seeking help. However, they reported the desire to find effective treatment as the primary factor in the decision. Clinic patients, on the other hand, cited being referred as primary in the seeking help decision, with the desire for effective treatment being secondary. Results of this study suggest that volunteers for drug research are similar in important ways to persons who seek treatment for similar symptomatology. They also suggest that perception of need for treatment may be affected by the strength of specific depressive symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2794097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  6 in total

1.  The personality structure of 'normal' volunteers.

Authors:  C J Ball; P M McLaren; P J Morrison
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Challenges to evidence-based medicine: a comparison of patients and treatments in randomized controlled trials with patients and treatments in a practice research network.

Authors:  Deborah A Zarin; Julia L Young; Joyce C West
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 3.  Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer.

Authors:  D D Turner
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Data to assess the generalizability of samples from studies of adult smokers.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Peter W Callas
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 5.  Effectiveness of over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy: a qualitative review of nonrandomized trials.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Erica N Peters; Shelly Naud
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  The healthy volunteer in clinical pharmacology: personality and motivation.

Authors:  F P Meyer; R Haschke; F W Röhl
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.