Alicia J Spittle1,2,3, Sarah Barton4, Karli Treyvaud4,3,5,6, Carly S Molloy4, Lex W Doyle4,3,5,7, Peter J Anderson4,5. 1. Victorian Infant Brain Study, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; aspittle@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Departments of Physiotherapy. 3. Women's Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia; and. 4. Victorian Infant Brain Study, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5. Paediatrics, and. 6. Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. 7. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the child and parental outcomes at school age of a randomized controlled trial of a home-based early preventative care program for infants born very preterm and their caregivers. METHODS: At term-equivalent age, 120 infants born at a gestational age of <30 weeks were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 61) or standard care (n = 59) groups. The intervention included 9 home visits over the first year of life focusing on infant development, parental mental health, and the parent-infant relationship. At 8 years' corrected age, children's cognitive, behavioral, and motor functioning and parental mental health were assessed. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS:One hundred children, including 13 sets of twins, attended follow-up (85% follow-up of survivors). Children in the intervention group were less likely to have mathematics difficulties (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.98; P = .045) than children in the standard care group, but there was no evidence of an effect on other developmental outcomes. Parents in the intervention group reported fewer symptoms of depression (mean difference, -2.7; 95% CI, -4.0 to -1.4; P < .001) and had reduced odds for mild to severe depression (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.68; P = .0152) than parents in the standard care group. CONCLUSIONS: An early preventive care program for very preterm infants and their parents had minimal long-term effects on child neurodevelopmental outcomes at the 8-year follow-up, whereas primary caregivers in the intervention group reported less depression.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To examine the child and parental outcomes at school age of a randomized controlled trial of a home-based early preventative care program for infants born very preterm and their caregivers. METHODS: At term-equivalent age, 120 infants born at a gestational age of <30 weeks were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 61) or standard care (n = 59) groups. The intervention included 9 home visits over the first year of life focusing on infant development, parental mental health, and the parent-infant relationship. At 8 years' corrected age, children's cognitive, behavioral, and motor functioning and parental mental health were assessed. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: One hundred children, including 13 sets of twins, attended follow-up (85% follow-up of survivors). Children in the intervention group were less likely to have mathematics difficulties (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.98; P = .045) than children in the standard care group, but there was no evidence of an effect on other developmental outcomes. Parents in the intervention group reported fewer symptoms of depression (mean difference, -2.7; 95% CI, -4.0 to -1.4; P < .001) and had reduced odds for mild to severe depression (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.68; P = .0152) than parents in the standard care group. CONCLUSIONS: An early preventive care program for very preterm infants and their parents had minimal long-term effects on child neurodevelopmental outcomes at the 8-year follow-up, whereas primary caregivers in the intervention group reported less depression.
Authors: Manuela Filippa; Lara Lordier; Joana Sa De Almeida; Maria Grazia Monaci; Alexandra Adam-Darque; Didier Grandjean; Pierre Kuhn; Petra S Hüppi Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Álvaro Bejarano-Martín; Ricardo Canal-Bedia; María Magán-Maganto; Aránzazu Hernández Fabián; Andrea Luz Calvarro Castañeda; Sara Manso de Dios; Patricia Malmierca García; Emiliano Díez Villoria; Cristina Jenaro Río; Manuel Posada de la Paz Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-05-15
Authors: Mona Dür; Anna Röschel; Christiane Oberleitner-Leeb; Verena Herrmanns; Elisabeth Pichler-Stachl; Barbara Mattner; Silvia-Desiree Pernter; Martin Wald; Berndt Urlesberger; Herbert Kurz; Thomas Frischer; Karl Zwiauer; Inu Sarah Matter; Angelika Berger Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Julia Orkin; Nathalie Major; Kayla Esser; Arpita Parmar; Elise Couture; Thierry Daboval; Emily Kieran; Linh Ly; Karel O'Brien; Hema Patel; Anne Synnes; Kate Robson; Lesley Barreira; Wanda L Smith; Sara Rizakos; Andrew R Willan; Maryna Yaskina; Myla E Moretti; Wendy J Ungar; Marilyn Ballantyne; Paige Terrien Church; Eyal Cohen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.692