Literature DB >> 27940131

Comparison of the quantification of KRAS mutations by digital PCR and E-ice-COLD-PCR in circulating-cell-free DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

David Sefrioui1, Florence Mauger2, Laurence Leclere2, Ludivine Beaussire3, Frédéric Di Fiore1, Jean-François Deleuze2, Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur3, Jörg Tost4.   

Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) bears great promise as biomarker for personalized medicine, but ccfDNA is present only at low levels in the plasma or serum of cancer patients. E-ice-COLD-PCR is a recently developed enrichment method to detect and identify mutations present at low-abundance in clinical samples. However, recent studies have shown the importance to accurately quantify low-abundance mutations as clinically important decisions will depend on certain mutation thresholds. The possibility for an enrichment method to accurately quantify the mutation levels remains a point of concern and might limit its clinical applicability. In the present study, we compared the quantification of KRAS mutations in ccfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients by E-ice-COLD-PCR with two digital PCR approaches. For the quantification of mutations by E-ice-COLD-PCR, cell lines with known mutations diluted into WT genomic DNA were used for calibration. E-ice-COLD-PCR and the two digital PCR approaches showed the same range of the mutation level and were concordant for mutation levels below the clinical relevant threshold. E-ice-COLD-PCR can accurately detect and quantify low-abundant mutations in ccfDNA and has a shorter time to results making it compatible with the requirements of analyses in a clinical setting without the loss of quantitative accuracy.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circulating cell-free DNA; Colorectal cancer; Digital PCR; E-ice-COLD-PCR; KRAS; Mutation enrichment; Quantification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27940131     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  12 in total

1.  An ultrasensitive test for profiling circulating tumor DNA using integrated comprehensive droplet digital detection.

Authors:  Chen-Yin Ou; Tam Vu; Jonathan T Grunwald; Michael Toledano; Jan Zimak; Melody Toosky; Byron Shen; Jason A Zell; Enrico Gratton; Timothy J Abram; Weian Zhao
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 2.  COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications.

Authors:  Florence Mauger; Alexandre How-Kit; Jörg Tost
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Detection and Quantification of ctDNA for Longitudinal Monitoring of Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Using a Universal Mutant Detection Assay by Denaturing Capillary Electrophoresis.

Authors:  Lucie Benesova; Renata Ptackova; Tereza Halkova; Anastasiya Semyakina; Martin Svaton; Ondrej Fiala; Milos Pesek; Marek Minarik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  Enhanced-ice-COLD-PCR for the Sensitive Detection of Rare DNA Methylation Patterns in Liquid Biopsies.

Authors:  Florence Mauger; Jörg Tost
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-12-05

5.  Detection of somatic mutations in cell-free DNA in plasma and correlation with overall survival in patients with solid tumors.

Authors:  Meenakshi Mehrotra; Rajesh R Singh; Sanam Loghavi; Dzifa Yawa Duose; Bedia A Barkoh; Carmen Behrens; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Scott Kopetz; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Ignacio I Wistuba; Rajyalakshmi Luthra
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-10-24

6.  Assessing the Impact of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Separating Fact From Fiction.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gabriel; Sanjay P Bagaria
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  CEA, CA19-9, circulating DNA and circulating tumour cell kinetics in patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Authors:  David Sefrioui; Ludivine Beaussire; Pierre Michel; Frédéric Di Fiore; André Gillibert; France Blanchard; Emmanuel Toure; Céline Bazille; Anne Perdrix; Frédéric Ziegler; Alice Gangloff; Mélanie Hassine; Caroline Elie; Anne-Laure Bignon; Aurélie Parzy; Philippe Gomez; Caroline Thill; Florian Clatot; Jean-Christophe Sabourin; Thierry Frebourg; Jacques Benichou; Karine Bouhier-Leporrier; Marie-Pierre Gallais; Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 9.075

8.  Measuring KRAS Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA by Droplet Digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Christina Demuth; Karen-Lise Garm Spindler; Julia S Johansen; Niels Pallisgaard; Dorte Nielsen; Estrid Hogdall; Benny Vittrup; Boe Sandahl Sorensen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Ye; Peiling Cai; Jing Xie; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Ye; Peiling Cai; Jing Xie; Yuanyuan Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.