Literature DB >> 27939754

Increasing NO level regulates apoptosis and inflammation in macrophages after 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulphide challenge.

Satish Sagar1, Soumya Ranjan Parida1, Silpa Sabnam1, Huma Rizwan1, Sweta Pal1, Mitali Madhusmita Swain1, Arttatrana Pal2.   

Abstract

Generation of nitric oxide (NO) in cellular compartments acts in a redox-dependent manner to counteract oxidative stress either by directly acting as an antioxidant through scavenging superoxide anions (O2-), to form peroxynitrite (ONOO-) or acting as a signaling molecule, altering gene expression that triggers various physiological processes. However, the molecular mechanisms of macrophage activation and NO production leads to apoptosis and inflammation after 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulphide (CEES) exposure remains unclear. We showed that CEES exposure in macrophages increased the O2- production. Also CEES exposure transiently increases the NO production and ONOO- accumulation via expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS). Simultaneously, CEES exposure caused a significant reduction in cellular antioxidants and modulate lipid peroxidation (LPO), and protein carbonylation (PC) reactions, which was correlated with the increased level of NO and ONOO- accumulation. Mechanistic studies showed the DNA damage, 8-oxoGDNA glycosylase (OGG1) down regulation and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) accumulations in DNA, which was also confirmed by phosphorylation of ATM, ATR and H2A.X. Elevated levels of NO/ONOO- plays an important role in apoptosis, and alteration of cell cycle regulatory proteins in macrophages after CEES exposure. Moreover, CEES exposure to macrophage cells enhanced the transcriptional activities of inflammatory mediators such as TNFα, IL-1α, ICAM, CX3CL1, CCL8, and CXCL10, which were linked with NO/ONOO- accumulation. These results showed a mechanistic explanation of how NO/ONOO- cooperate to conduct apoptosis and inflammatory signals in macrophages after CEES challenged. Further, the protective effects of NO/ONOO- inhibitors may provide the basis for the development of a therapeutic strategy to counteract exposure to CEES.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; Biomolecules damage; CEES; Inflammation; NO

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939754     DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 1357-2725            Impact factor:   5.085


  5 in total

1.  Screening of the chemoprotective effect of 13 compounds and their mixtures with sodium 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate against 2-chloroethyl ethyl sulfide.

Authors:  Petr Jost; Jaroslav Pejchal; Tomas Kucera; Lubica Muckova; Rudolf Stetina
Journal:  J Appl Biomed       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.797

2.  DNA damage signaling in the cellular responses to mustard vesicants.

Authors:  Yi-Hua Jan; Diane E Heck; Debra L Laskin; Jeffrey D Laskin
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  Gold nanoparticles reduce high glucose-induced oxidative-nitrosative stress regulated inflammation and apoptosis via tuberin-mTOR/NF-κB pathways in macrophages.

Authors:  Huma Rizwan; Jagdeep Mohanta; Satyabrata Si; Arttatrana Pal
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-08-17

4.  Chemical composition of tetraploid Gynostemma pentaphyllum gypenosides and their suppression on inflammatory response by NF-κB/MAPKs/AP-1 signaling pathways.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Ming Li; Hang Gao; Xiangjun Sun; Boyan Gao; Yaqiong Zhang; Liangli Yu
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Bioinformatics identification of CCL8/21 as potential prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Bowen Chen; Shuyuan Zhang; Qiuyu Li; Shiting Wu; Han He; Jinbo Huang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.840

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.