Literature DB >> 27939024

Partial versus complete removal of the infected mesh after abdominal wall hernia repair.

José Bueno-Lledó1, Antonio Torregrosa-Gallud2, Omar Carreño-Saénz2, Providencia García-Pastor2, Fernando Carbonell-Tatay2, Santiago Bonafé-Diana2, José Iserte-Hernández2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the results with complete mesh removal (CMR) versus partial mesh removal (PMR) in the treatment of mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia repair (AWHR).
METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgery for mesh infection between January 2004 and May 2014 at a tertiary center.
RESULTS: Of 3470 cases of AWHR, we reported 66 cases (1.9%) of mesh infection, and 48 repairs (72.7%) required mesh explantation. CMR was achieved on 38 occasions, while PMR was undertaken ten times. We observed more postoperative complications in CMR than PMR group (p = 0.04). Three patients with intestinal fistula were reoperated in postoperative period after a difficult mesh removal; one of them died due to multiple organ failure. The overall recurrence rate after explantation was 47.9%: recurrence was more frequent in CMR group (p = 0.001), although persistent or new mesh infection was observed more frequently with PMR (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although PMR has less postoperative morbidity, shorter duration of hospitalization and lower rate of recurrence than CMR, prosthetic infection persists in up to 50% of cases.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall hernia; Hernia repair; Mesh explantation; Mesh infection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939024     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of complete versus partial mesh removal for the treatment of chronic mesh infection after abdominal wall hernia repair.

Authors:  S Levy; D Moszkowicz; T Poghosyan; A Beauchet; M -M Chandeze; K Vychnevskaia; F Peschaud; J -L Bouillot
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Total or partial removal of infected mesh? Invited comment.

Authors:  P Ortega-Deballon
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Re-do surgery after prosthetic abdominal wall repair: intraoperative findings of mesh-related complications.

Authors:  F Ceci; L D'Amore; M R Grimaldi; L Bambi; E Annesi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Colonisation by Fibroblasts and Antimicrobial Properties of Surgical Meshes Coated with Bacterial Cellulose.

Authors:  Karolina Dydak; Adam Junka; Grzegorz Nowacki; Justyna Paleczny; Patrycja Szymczyk-Ziółkowska; Aleksandra Górzyńska; Olga Aniołek; Marzenna Bartoszewicz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Why we remove mesh.

Authors:  R Sharma; N Fadaee; E Zarrinkhoo; S Towfigh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  The influence of mesh removal during laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias on the long-term outcome.

Authors:  Hasan Ediz Sikar; Kenan Çetin
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.195

7.  Urinary bladder fistula following laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Ken Hagiwara; Shigeoki Hayashi; Takeki Suzuki; Keio Song; Tadatoshi Takayama
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  The negative pressure wound therapy may salvage the infected mesh following open incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  K Boettge; S Azarhoush; J Fiebelkorn; G De Santo; N Aljedani; P Ortiz; S Anders; M Hünerbein; C Paasch
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-12-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.